Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Tony Jefferson, safety


jtnc

Recommended Posts

Tony Jefferson*, S, Oklahoma Height: 5-10. Weight: 212. Projected 40 Time: 4.49. Projected Round (2013): 1. 9/15/12: Jefferson started the year strong with 10 tackles and a pass broken up against UTEP. He had one tackle against Florida A&M. Oklahoma has a bye week before a big game against Kansas State. 9/2/12: Jefferson has been a play-maker and leader of the Sooners' defense since he arrived in Norman. Jefferson was the Big XII Freshman of the Year in 2010. He started nine games and recorded 65 tackles with seven tackles for a loss, two sacks, two interceptions and seven passes broken up. Jefferson was even better last year. The sophomore had 74 tackles with four interceptions, 4.5 sacks, 7.5 tackles for a loss, three passes broken up and one forced fumble. Jefferson is an excellent pass-defender who covers a lot of ground in the deep part of the field. He does a good job of picking up receivers running deep and has the athletic ability to play man coverage on tight ends. Jefferson is solid in run support. The athletic and instinctive safety has a high ceiling and could be in store for another big season or two for the Sooners. Jefferson is a difference-maker and a regular generator of splash plays. He has added some bulk this offseason and that should appeal to NFL evaluators.

http://walterfootball.com/draft2013S.php

Looks like he overtook Eric Reid as the top safety of the draft, sounds like a true FS to me. Me want.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jefferson or Lester are the two guys I'm looking at at Safety.

Fast, good cover guys who can cover a lot of distance and make plays on the ball.

The more and more I see of Reid, whom I like, the more I see box safety, and McDonald seems to be caught out of position an awful lot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jefferson is a great cover safety but he isn't much of a sure tackler. Not a big guy either. I haven't noticed Lester much this season but I remember liking him quite a bit more than Barron.

The guy I really want to see is Bacarri Rambo. He was looking like a flat out stud at FS. Not to mention he has a cool name.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i would rather have someone with some height to him. over 6' please.

This is the dumbest thing you've ever said.

"Hey, Hurndawg brah, it's me, Ozzie Newsome I'm gonna make you an offer you can't refuse."

"What is it this time Ozzie? I told you. I don't want Secondary players that can cover! Gotta get me some strong run-stuffers so I can shut down the ever increasing potency of NFL rushing attacks!!"

"Just hear me out brah, just hear me out. I'll give you Ed Reed straight up, for Sherrod Martin!"

"The heck? You kidding me dude? That midget? Martin is tall and stuff and MOST IMPORTANT OF ALL, we drafted him. Don't call back."

"hey, Mr. Richardson, I did what you asked me to. Now please get the Browns on the line and ask them what it'd take to get Richardson off their hands. I'm gonna make me a sammich and being working up long term contract negotiations with Kenny Onatolu"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

if that's the dumbest thing i've ever said i'm impressed. thought it would have been worse than that.

sure...the ONLY thing i want is a guy that is tall. doesn't matter if he can cover, tackle, catch, crap...i don't care if he sucks as long as he is tall.

if THAT is what you got from my post then you are far more ignorant than anyone could have ever have imagined.

who wouldn't want someone that had actual skills and talent? that stuff is a given, or it should be for anyone who doesn't need corks on their forks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

if that's the dumbest thing i've ever said i'm impressed. thought it would have been worse than that.

sure...the ONLY thing i want is a guy that is tall. doesn't matter if he can cover, tackle, catch, crap...i don't care if he sucks as long as he is tall.

if THAT is what you got from my post then you are far more ignorant than anyone could have ever have imagined.

who wouldn't want someone that had actual skills and talent? that stuff is a given, or it should be for anyone who doesn't need corks on their forks.

Except your previous post contradicted everything you put in this post. You dismissed the player brought forth in the OP because he was under 6 feet, and didn't care to consider his talent or any of the things you mentioned just now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

None of our safeties can tackle a downhill running back. Absolutely zero of them. Which is why I said I want a safety that's a better tackler than ballhawk.

That is a dumb, Hurneyesque move in the modern NFL. It is 2012 and the days of gearing to stop the run and control the clock are over and the Safety position is seeing its value skyrocket and a premium on talented Safeties are being demanded because of it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That is a dumb, Hurneyesque move in the modern NFL. It is 2012 and the days of gearing to stop the run and control the clock are over and the Safety position is seeing its value skyrocket and a premium on talented Safeties are being demanded because of it.

Cool maybe i'm next in line for the job then. I for one am tired of bitching about godfrey and whoever else being run over by any back that weighs over 190. Safeties covering jobs are not as complicated as corner covering jobs. Which is why I said what I said. I would take a washed up minter over the baby back bullshit we have right now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Except your previous post contradicted everything you put in this post. You dismissed the player brought forth in the OP because he was under 6 feet, and didn't care to consider his talent or any of the things you mentioned just now.

no it didn't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • A lot of people have been slobbing all over this last draft but I hate the way that Fitterer/Morgan have built this offense since drafting Bryce. Anyone with eyes knew our IOL was crap but we didn't invest there and instead took project receivers and an injured RB. If you want a lesson in how build for your QB wrong, IMO, this was it. Draft him, protect him, THEN get him weapons. Its pretty much a rule, draft interior linemen, pay tackles. We're paying everyone. We had the opportunity to draft a center instead of Brooks, or perhaps instead of trading up for XL, trade back and take 2 guards/center. We could have paid Lewis and still drafted 2, but Hunt at 100m was just an overpay. And it's not like the guys many of us were begging us to draft were long shots. They're solid starters from day 1. Injuries happen. That's why all your starters can't be high value players. You need rookie contracts mixed in to be able to absorb those inevitable losses on the line. An offensive line playing an entire season together is an abnormality.  Factor into that also paying Moton 44m this offseason with a huge signing bonus when we didnt need to do right now to do him a "solid".  Now we have to sign Icky and possibly Bryce and it's a mess with more money tied up in the offense, inevitable cuts and dead cap coming. That's not even factoring in shifting Corbett to C last year after major injury to start at a position he's never played for an NFL season. It's all stuff that was foreseeable and pretty easily avoided.  The $$ and picks we've spent trying to surround Bryce outside of Tmac (Mitchell and Horn are TBD) have been used inefficiently IMO. Smarter drafting and FA with the line could have let us get more reliable weapons than XL and Sanders in FA. It might not be popular opinion, but I'll take a Bersin with hands that can get 6-8 85% of the time vs a big play XL with greasy fingers.  The part about hitting guys in stride was more about placement, which Bryce has struggled with. Obviously not every route is run to be hit in stride, but they do need to have the ball placed well to give the receivers a chance to do something after the catch. I just used Hill as an example because he's the biggest YAC threat I could think of over the past 5 years.   Receivers can feast on dink and dunk if it's schemed right. But to make it work, that vertical threat has to be there, if not the deep pass then the high speed routes that can spring someone for the huge YAC to keep the safeties from cheating into that 20 yard box all game.  I hope DC and Bryce can keep up what they did in the last game and it isnt just an Atlanta thing. But no matter what, I really want to see some better long term strategy coming from the FO. 
    • Eh. Don't speak it into existence lol. We've got enough on our plate just trying to overcome the bad juju of what has been our historically bad perfomances more often than not in primetime over the course of 30 years. We're overdue for a statement primetime game!
    • Passing chart had 3 over 20 I think. The Legette TD and another completion and an incompletion. All over 20 yards.  An incompletion at 19 or maybe 20 yards. So you could technically probably say 4 throws 20 or more.     That seems high to me compared to the norm. 45 throws and 10 YPA are both way high.   
×
×
  • Create New...