Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

No sense of urgency in Rivera's voice...


Zod

Recommended Posts

How long is Riveras contract, because thats how long he'll be head coach in Carolina? Id be stoked if JR fired Rivera and hired Gruden, Dungy, or Cowher....but its not going to happen. I hate to say it but Id rather have Fox back and that speaks volumes for me.

hire this guy:

jon-gruden-as-chucky.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How long is Riveras contract, because thats how long he'll be head coach in Carolina? Id be stoked if JR fired Rivera and hired Gruden, Dungy, or Cowher....but its not going to happen. I hate to say it but Id rather have Fox back and that speaks volumes for me.

hire this guy:

jon-gruden-as-chucky.jpg

He signed the cheapest contract for a coach in the league so firing him would be easy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Get rid of the OC and his lame playbook, smoke and mirrors nancy pancy bs. This O is losing steam. Chud is not the answer and its easier to replace him than RR.

Dungy would be my pick. Gruden second.... I hate to admit this but I think Schiano is better than RR atm. They got a good one in tampa imo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It's not impossible to go from worst to first.  We kept Evero because anyone in there right mind knew our defense was destroyed by injuries, not the scheme.  Evero has been given a plethora of talent between free agency and the draft, not to mention getting DB back. I fully expect our defense to be very good.  I have no reason to think Jones would say something like that unless he truly felt like that.   
    • We would’ve played Florida and lost in the 1st instead of the 3rd round.  Montreal would have been the 8 seed.
    • I can't get behind a purely subjective re-draft as a method of defining "top-10 QB" status. That invites bias based on vibes/hypotheticals and can ignore actual on-field performance. You and others have said that Bryce has to be a top-10 QB to justify the pick. That's a high bar, which I'm not against, but we need a clear, consistent way to measure it. When I bring up metrics that Bryce has registered in the top-10 in like BTT%, P2S ratio, catchable deep ball rate, etc... they're waved off as either irrelevant or the expected baseline performance. Meanwhile, volume stats like passing yards or win-loss records, both of which depend heavily on roster talent, health, and coaching, are treated as definitive. That's where the inconsistency kicks in. If no performance metric ever counts in his favor and the answer is always going to be "he should be doing that," then we're not evaluating him... we're just holding him to a curve he can't win against. If this is really about performance standards, then let's define them. But if it's just about confirming prior takes based on height and weight, then let's call it what is it and stop pretending that this is a football analysis discussion.
×
×
  • Create New...