Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

With all this talk about Cam's leadership...

Marguide

By Marguide,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

Marguide Newbie

Marguide

Posted
Posted

...have people not been paying attention?

Did you not see Cam going around to each player before the 1st possession slapping their hands and getting them pumped up?

Did you not see Cam standing on the sideline watching the defense try to hold back Seattle?

Did you see any indication that Cam went into a funk in the huddle at any point in the game?

Did you watch his postgame presser and see how well he handled himself?

Cam has listened to the criticism and has been working hard at improving in this aspect of his game. Yes, he had a bad game, but please recognize that he is handling himself much better as a leader. Question his passes, question his ability to read defenses, but it's time to stop with the comments about him pouting and not paying attention on the sideline.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
jtm Rising Star

jtm

Posted
Posted

Cam is a lightning rod for better or worse. We wanted a national superstar and now we have one. The media will feast when he plays well and kill him when he plays bad. ESPN and NFL network are entertainment stations rather than news outlets.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Marguide Newbie

Marguide

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Cam is a lightning rod for better or worse. We wanted a national superstar and now we have one. The media will feast when he plays well and kill him when he plays bad. ESPN and NFL network are entertainment stations rather than news outlets.

My comments were directed at Huddle members. There is no hope for ESPN and other media outlets. After all, Cam sells, good or bad doesn't matter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Joe Bear
      Okay, now face the facta guyd

      By Joe Bear · Posted

      No, it will be a raw 6'7" 17-year-old European who just played basketball for the first time in March and who the idiot GM "had first on our board." He'll play the whole G-League season, get in 42 games for the Hornets and average 1.1 ppg on 35% shooting. Been there, seen that.
    • ForJimmy
      JJ Jansen on tanking

      By ForJimmy · Posted

      We missed on Burns at his peak value. That’s the problem with trading for picks 2-3 years away (which people were convinced the Rams would suck by now and these would be higher picks btw). Each year away the pick is the further in value it drops. Fitt was clearly hired based on turning us around quickly. It’s one of the many reasons tanking isn’t really a thing as our player JJ is telling you in this original article. It would take the whole organization from the owners down admitting they aren’t winning soon with Burns and picks 2-3 years away having more value because that’s when we are still rebuilding. It would only make sense if Fitt had a longer leash and would more than likely be the ones making these picks anyway which you wouldn’t want. The question is would you rather have those Rams picks with the strong possibility of Fitt still being here or would you rather Fitt try to “win now” like he did and expedite his firing? Altering the timeline would affect more than just the Rams picks. 
    • HaricotVert
      Potential changes to playoff seeding

      By HaricotVert · Posted

      I dont buy the idea that it would create more competitive games Given this: Seed Current Format Record Proposed Open Seeding Record 1 Lions 15–2 Lions 15–2 2 Eagles 14–3 Eagles 14–3 3 Buccaneers 10–7 Vikings 14–3 4 Rams 10–7 Commanders 12–5 5 Vikings 14–3 Rams 10–7 6 Commanders 12–5 Buccaneers 10–7 7 Packers 11–6 Packers 11–6 That would mean Wild Card round would have been Eagles (14/3) v  Pack(11/6) Vikings(14/3) v Bucs(10/7) Commanders(12/5) v Rams(10/7) Instead of Eagles (14/3) v  Pack(11/6) Bucs(10/7) v Commanders(12/5) Rams(10/7) v Vikings(14/3) Then with the reseed it would mean that highest remaining seed would always draw the lowest remaining team.
×
×
  • Create New...