Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

boobs

Jase

By Jase,
in Huddle Lounge

Recommended Posts

Wyank Rookie

Wyank

Posted
Posted

Sag yes... shrink, idk. I always thought it was linked to weight gain/loss...

Joking aside, biscuit makes a good point. I have heard of them shrinking from weight loss. Also the obvious getting bigger when producing milk then going back down when no longer producing milk.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mrs Pantherfan Newbie

Mrs Pantherfan

Posted
Posted

you're right Biscuit...unless you gain or lose weight..boobies just go...down :)

that being said..When I swelled up to cow size, my boobs were DD's...lost 50 lbs...they're now D's...but 12 years ago they were C's when I first met MrPF...and I'm the same size now as I was then...don't think muh boobs will ever be C's again :(....though I thought MrPF was going to cry ...it's like he could see them shrinking by the day

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Zcustom Newbie

Zcustom

Posted
Posted

isn't your wife on a diet/excercise program?

boobs are mostly fatty deposits, over time the breast tissue diminishes leaving only said fatty deposits. Lose weight=lose boobs, ask MPF (I really don't mean that in a bad way, she's commented on it in here before)

Also breast milk blows them up like balloons and when the milk stops it's like a popped balloon. I think petite boobs are super sexy, so it doesn't concern me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
mmmbeans Newbie

mmmbeans

Posted
Posted

that's what's perplexing, she weighs more now than before kids. but boobies are now smaller.

she went between D to DD before kids, now after 2 kids, she's down to C.

i learned the other day that cup size is a ratio of boob size to strap size... same size boobs + larger strap = smaller cup.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest

Guest

Posted
Posted

you're right Biscuit...unless you gain or lose weight..boobies just go...down :)

that being said..When I swelled up to cow size, my boobs were DD's...lost 50 lbs...they're now D's...but 12 years ago they were C's when I first met MrPF...and I'm the same size now as I was then...don't think muh boobs will ever be C's again :(....though I thought MrPF was going to cry ...it's like he could see them shrinking by the day

I fail to see a problem here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Jase Apprentice

Jase

Posted
  • Author
Posted

i learned the other day that cup size is a ratio of boob size to strap size... same size boobs + larger strap = smaller cup.

They seem smaller to the hand test, too. I'll have to keep re-evaluating until I figure it out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • tukafan21
      Well, the Niners just doomed themselves to mediocrity

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      Um, no, just no. Bills, Chiefs, Chargers, Ravens, Bengals, Texans, Eagles, Commanders are 8 teams that it's not even a debate, they aren't trading their QB for Purdy. Patriots, Broncos, Titans, Giants, Bears, Vikings, Falcons are 7 more teams with QBs drafted in the last 2 years that also would rather stick with them than trade for Purdy as they all have more upside than he does. Lions, Packers, Cowboys, Bucs are 4 more that would likely keep their QB's as well, age aside for Goff, Dak, and Baker. Panthers and Colts are two teams in the same situation, QB's who have both struggled and shown flashes to where the teams probably stick with them because they drafted them, but in a re-draft of all QB's, they probably take Purdy over the guy they currently have. Jags, Cardinals, Dolphins, are 3 more with QB's who probably have a higher upside than Purdy but come with their own question marks, so debatable if they'd take Purdy over who they already have. That leaves Jets, Raiders, Steelers, Browns, Saints, Seahawks, and Rams. Rams would take him over Stafford for the future of course, but not for 2025, and I'd think the Seahawks would take him over Darnold, but honestly not sure if they would take him over Milroe at this moment as they really like his potential and have him for 4 years really cheap. That leaves 5 teams that I see who would absolutely take him over their current situation right now, and a handful of others who MIGHT take him over their current guy, a far cry from your 20.  
    • ForJimmy
      The Bryce Trade is Finally Complete. Who Won the Trade? Panthers vs Bears

      By ForJimmy · Posted

      Agreed. Also as soon as they received the top pick in the next draft it was over. Bears won that trade. Gave up a top overall pick got one the next year plus pick 9, a couple 2nds, and DJ Moore a proven young WR. Had their 2024 pick from us be in the late teens or later it would be more debatable IMO. 
    • Loyalty4Life
      Well, the Niners just doomed themselves to mediocrity

      By Loyalty4Life · Posted

      Option A:  Pay your starting QB starting QB money. Option B:  Look for a starting QB for 4-10 years (or longer) while wasting the talent at every other position.    How many of the top 20 QB's do you think are worth what they are being paid?   When you factor in the last year of his present deal his contract is really an average of 45 million per year which in today's QB market is a very, very good deal. I wish we'd had found a Brock Purdy to pay 50+ million a year right after we parted ways with Cam.  Ya'll go ahead and live in fairy tale land where good to great (much less elite) QB's are available to pay. Just the fact that they had the chance to pay Brock after the disaster of trading up for Lance is a testament that when you find a quarter back you can win with, complete in the playoffs and superbowls with, you pay him.  
×
×
  • Create New...