Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

How Many Wins Would This Team Have With (Insert Hall Of Fame Name Here) As Coach?


Proudiddy

Recommended Posts

It seems a big point of debate lately has been whether people believe this team is talented enough to win consistently as-is versus not enough talent to win and we're just seeing the results of bad personnel management.

I've held to the idea that we are talented enough as-is to win year in and year out (starting with last year's team)... Maybe not 12 wins a year, but at least 9.

So, I ask... If Bill Belichick was coaching this team from the start of the year, how many wins would we end up with?

Better yet, since everyone wants to compare RG3 and Cam lately, this has been nagging me even more... Shannahan knows how to accentuate and capitalize on RG3's strengths. He knows what to do from game to game to protect him. So, if Shannahan was coaching this team, how many wins would we have?

If your answer is greater than what we're trending towards currently, then that should answer whether we have enough talent as-is. I believe we are guaranteed 9 wins with either of those coaches, as well as many other coaches who aren't quite those two guys' caliber. That's why it's so disappointing to have wasted yet another year and it's time to move forward with a new staff when the season is over (at the latest).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

...If your answer is greater than what we're trending towards currently, then that should answer whether we have enough talent as-is. I believe we are guaranteed 9 wins with either of those coaches, as well as many other coaches who aren't quite those two guys' caliber. That's why it's so disappointing to have wasted yet another year and it's time to move forward with a new staff when the season is over (at the latest).

I'm not so sure it's quite so binary. I both believe we could have won more games with a better coaching staff and that our team is not as talented as it should be in the right places.

I feel like this coaching staff has failed to extract the level of performance they should from the talent we do have and as much as I hate myself for saying it (because I really do like Rivera the guy) I think we should be throwing out the baby, the bathwater, and the tub they were in. I'd like to see the new GM at least have the opportunity to replace the coach. Growing pains / specifics aside this team is fundamentally flawed in preparation, use of existing talent, and scheme. These things can't be blamed on the GM.

Of course a better coaching staff could have done a lot more with what we have than the one we have, sure, but I don't really think that says we are talented enough as-is either, at least on the defensive side. We have talent stacked at odd places while being woefully understaffed in the secondary / along the D-Line.

I actually do believe the offense is talented enough to win games as-is. Like any unit it could be better but there is enough talent there (if oddly distributed and terribly mismanaged - hai2u deluxe luxury edition backfield and option based offense).

TL;DR - I think we have enough talent to win more games but not enough talent to win enough games. Better coaches will get better results with what we have. Better management will improve the talent pool the better coaches have to work with.

*edit*

I think we're an 8-9 win team with better coaches, the injury situation we have right now, and no change in player personnel. But I don't think we'd be good enough to get past the wildcard round if we did manage to squeak in as a 9 win team somehow - better coaches or not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would say probably 1 or 2 more wins. Hurney is the main one who has destroyed the team and Chud has ruined our offense. I think if we had a better OC, the team would overall be better. McDermott isn't the best, but at least he has improved game after game. With a good OC, we wouldn't be bad at all. I would guarantee we would be over .500.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yeah, I could jump right into the unbelievable Bryce debate now that some people are trying to flip the script because Bryce Young has, at most, a handful of decent games as a pro, but that's going to work itself out. Suffice it to say that I've seen better QBs (with an s) in a Panthers uniform, and I've certainly seen better QBs be drafted while we're playing around with Bryce, one of them who beat the crap out of us already this season... Let's forget about Bryce (and his markedly underwhelming play since he's been here); I think that most sane fans will agree that drafting him was an error, but it happens. Sure, it doesn't happen to the tune of King's ransom---including your main receiver---but it happens. You bet, you lose. Speaking of receivers...and betting and losing... Oh, man, we drafted Xavier Legette. Yes, just like with Bryce, I've entered "the dark side." Some Huddlers were telling us from the beginning, and they were right. But, I'm not apologizing for waiting to see what a guy's got before making my decision on him. X was a one-year wonder at South Carolina who parlayed some really nice production that season, a great personality and thick country accent, into becoming a first round pick (but only in Carolina). For Dan Morgan and company, He was a big swing that has turned into a big whiff (and I can still feel the ill breeze from that one). Sh¡t happens, right? Well, not so fast. Ladd McConkey was the decidedly more polished receiver who was literally ready to hit the ground running as soon as stepping onto the field as a pro. Ladd was never the biggest guy (though not the smallest), but he was the guy that could run routes, always seemed to get open---no question---and had the same speed as X, but with legit quickness and nuanced shake and bake. But Dan chose the project. He chose the guy where the game speed looks more like a tractor trailer than a 5.0 mustang. Look, I've supported X (just like Bryce) many many a day, but no more. Now I'm not saying that I won't root for the guy. Just like with Bryce, he seems like a great kid. But as far as giving excuses for the kid, and, perhaps more importantly, waiting for some miraculous breakout, I'm done with that. I've seen enough. You don't draft a project for a project. And yes, Bryce had proven to be a project after his first season. In my mind, drafting a supposedly number one receiver that needs lots of development for a starting quarterback that needs immediate help to try and further his development is not going to lead to good things. Pick the surest guy. Or at least pick the one who appears to be the surest guy, because picking can be tricky... especially when you're too busy tricking yourself. 
    • Winning ain't gonna make my eyes lie to me. Context matters, and it will always matter in the game of football.
    • That TD pass to Legette against Miami. Elite. The play where Bryce rolls right to buy time until Tet can reverse field.  Bryce pumps as multiple defenders close in.  He barely gets it away before he takes a big time hit.  Beautiful off platform throw and great catch by Tet.   The second TD to Tet against Dallas where Bryce dips and turns his shoulder in to evade the pass rusher.  Resets and finds Tet in the end zone. Dude embodies the Keep Pounding mantra.  
×
×
  • Create New...