Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Name the 10 players that would hurt us the most if not on the team next year.


panther4life

Recommended Posts

why?

because I am bored at work and the huddle is my main source of fighting the boredom. Figured I would try and spark a unique conversation on here.

But if you prefer we can talk about how racist the media is or talk about how everyone on the planet knows the read option is killing us or the 80 million dollar backfield we have or cowher or cams attitude or Riveras emotionless demeanor or you get the point or what a cheapskate Richardson is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'll bite.

Cam

Gross

Kalil

Bell

Smith

Olsen

Kuechly

Nope, couldn't do it. Can only get these 7. However, guys that I think will become part of the new core are Keek, Alexander, and Norman on defense, and Silatolu, Cam, Kalil, Olsen, Stew and Bell on O. Smith and Gross are on the list above because I think we still need them next year, but beyond that, not so much.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As far as I'm concerned, the following players have a spot on this team next year:

QB: Cam

Receivers: Smth, LaFell, Adams, Olsen

Running Backers: Stewart, Tolbert, Poole

OLine: Gross (good leader/teacher), Campbell, Bell, Silatolu, Hangartner, Kalil

Dline: Alexander, Hardy, Keisier, Dwan Edwards, Ron Edwards (both Edwards are good for depth, should not start full time)

LB: Kuechly, Beason (only if restructured contract), Davis, Anderon,

DB: Gamble, Norman. I'd be fine keeping Nakamura as a backup safety.

ST: Medlock, Nortman, Jansen

Sooooo....we need backup quarterbacks, depth at TE and FB, at least one good WR, a decent OT and OG, 1-2 good DTs, at least 1 good DE, 1 good CB, 1 good FS - - and some options on the return game. I'm fine keeping Johnson if we can restructure his deal but Dwill and big money are better to us on other teams. Rather have picks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As far as I'm concerned, the following players have a spot on this team next year:

QB: Cam

Receivers: Smth, LaFell, Adams, Olsen

Running Backers: Stewart, Tolbert, Poole

OLine: Gross (good leader/teacher), Campbell, Bell, Silatolu, Hangartner, Kalil

Dline: Alexander, Hardy, Keisier, Dwan Edwards, Ron Edwards (both Edwards are good for depth, should not start full time)

LB: Kuechly, Beason (only if restructured contract), Davis, Anderon,

DB: Gamble, Norman. I'd be fine keeping Nakamura as a backup safety.

ST: Medlock, Nortman, Jansen

Sooooo....we need backup quarterbacks, depth at TE and FB, at least one good WR, a decent OT and OG, 1-2 good DTs, at least 1 good DE, 1 good CB, 1 good FS - - and some options on the return game. I'm fine keeping Johnson if we can restructure his deal but Dwill and big money are better to us on other teams. Rather have picks.

jeeezzz...why don't we keep the whole team?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • if  ANYONE actually goes & looks at the FACTS on rookie Qb's after 2 full seasons as a starter in the NFL & they are still well below average do they rarely ever actually become top tier Qb's & instead most likely either do not recieve a second contract & or become life long backups...just saying 
    • So he became GM and decided not to address the weakness in the QB room following one of the worst rookie QB performances in NFL history?  There were options last season other than signing Dalton to a 2 year deal. Brissett and Jones by a wide margin, both of whom outplayed Bryce, Wilson, Winston, hell even Rivers off the couch was more exciting at the QB position. The time to address the failure in the QB room was last year but instead people on the Huddle cheered when we brought Dalton back then cheered when we were able to get anything for him after they finally realized he was washed up like a few of had been saying all along and got poo'd for even mentioning.  This year, the options were more limited obviously, especially since we lost Icky. It changed the dynamic of our draft. I think we were stuck this year keeping Bryce, but i still think giving him a 5th year option for what has amounted to replacement worthy performance was the wrong move. Why guarantee 25m if you're planning to replace him? You think he's going to want to be a bridge QB? Hell no. He's going to want out and we'll end up cutting him if he has another lackluster season because no one is trading for him with that price tag.  Were there better options as far as production available. A couple. Were there guys available with more physical tools than Bryce, Pickett or Grier, you damn well better believe there were. I've been saying all along, you always keep looking for your 1b. Bryce has yet to prove he can be a starter. Keep looking for someone who may. Put competition in camp. Let the best QB lead the team. Stop settling for less than mediocre. 
×
×
  • Create New...