Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Chuck Pagano

TruCatzFan

By TruCatzFan,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

TruCatzFan Newbie

TruCatzFan

Posted
Posted

I would like to preface the following statement by saying in no way am I laughing at this guys health or cancer or anything else. What he is facing is very real and very tough...

But his speech after the game had me laughing my ass off. I knew it was wrong to laugh, but after he said "we're going to hoist several Lombardi's together" I started laughing uncontrollably! No way in hell they win even one on the foreseeable future.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TruCatzFan Newbie

TruCatzFan

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Wouldn't want to be you, or your children. Karma's a bitch.

Why because I think it's funny that the guy thinks he's gonna win Superbowls?

As I said, I'm not laughing at his health is any way shape or form. Did you miss the OP?

I'm laughing from a pure football perspective.

And oh yeah, they're 5-3 right now, but the season is far from over

Link to comment
Share on other sites
King Taharqa Newbie

King Taharqa

Posted
Posted

The Colts should be applauded. They are doing good right now and feasting on a weak AFC. It'll be interesting to see if they do make the playoffs. I think they just miss out in the end, but I think they should be commended for rallying behind their coach and their development of Luck.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TruCatzFan Newbie

TruCatzFan

Posted
  • Author
Posted

The Colts should be applauded. They are doing good right now and feasting on a weak AFC. It'll be interesting to see if they do make the playoffs. I think they just miss out in the end, but I think they should be commended for rallying behind their coach and their development of Luck.

I totally agree with you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TruCatzFan Newbie

TruCatzFan

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Pagano's locker room speech was as inspiring as anything I've seen. Nothing humorous about it at all.

Fans of a team that treasured Sam Mills the way we do should be the last to say anything inappropriate about this situation.

It was good. Full of emotion, and about as real of a speech as I've heard. I just disagree on the Super Bowl part. It made me laugh. Again me laughing had nothing to do with his health

Link to comment
Share on other sites
theyhateme45 Newbie

theyhateme45

Posted
Posted

Why? Nothing that I've said about him is bad in any way. Unless you think they're going to win a Super Bowl in the next few years, I don't see how anything that I've said is even remotely controversial.

Ummmm you want your coach and team to have confidence and belief... it's not even like he said this year.

If we were 5-3 with our young stud QB we would be thinking we could win a superbowl in the next few years.... heck even with our current record I am sure some of us believe we can win within a few years... In the NFL all it takes is 1 run and some luck and you are there. Once you are in the playoffs anything can happen... just with a 2 or 3 game win streak you can be in the superbowl.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • MHS831
      Some homers' opinions of the OTs that we may realistically be able to get at 19

      By MHS831 · Posted

      You could say that-- but if we don't need a starting OT this year, why would you draft a flawed one that is not going to play? (We are coming from different underlying assumptions and perspectives--I see your argument and don't disagree with the premise) Your thinking is based on the assumption that an OT for the future is more important than immediate needs at other positions, or that we can meet other needs in later rounds even if we take the OT in round 1.  I do not think there is but 1 OT worthy of a first-round grade---they are mocked based on need and demand--if we do not have a need for a starter right now, a team at 18 may grab a T that is the 33rd best player--worth it if you have no starting T, but not if you have a starter.  So just because they are mocked around the middle of the first it does not mean that the players are good values--teams get desperate.  QBs are a great example.  Simpson may be worth it in round 1 for the Cardinals, but not the Jets, because they have Geno Smith.  Sure, they will need a QB by next year, but taking Simpson is a reach. I do not see our need, with 2 starters (Walker and Moton) and another possibly returning by the end of the season enough to justify ranking OT over positions like Safety, Will LB--I do not think we replaced A Shawn Robinson (We gonna put a NT out there?  Wharton (280lbs)?  So do we reach in round 1 for a player who may not play much or do we get a Will LB that can cover?  A deep free safety?  A quality center? A playmaking TE?  A DT to replace Robinson?  A wide receiver to balance the secondary?  Long term, if the right player was there, you would be right.  Short term, OT is a luxury at this point, in my view.  
    • strato
      Off-season topic: WWYD? Total Branding Redesign

      By strato · Posted

      Put Huey P Newton on the helmet. With his AK. 
    • csx
      Baldinger on the 2026 LB Class

      By csx · Posted

      We arent switching. Evero is 3-4 to the core. Given how 3-4 has been a noticeable characteristic of top defenses recently and we have drafted and signed players fir it  I dont know why anyone would think that's a good idea 
×
×
  • Create New...