Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Super Earth: HD40307-G


davos

Recommended Posts

Yes, getting there would be a much bigger hurdle, with the one exception of the much higher gravity. Be damned hard for us to build a colony in super high gravity, esp if we had no artificial gravity on the space ship for the journey.

Well we know that a fetus cant form properly in zero-g so we would have to have some sort of simulated gravity for any multi generational space travel. And once you have that, having it increase over the course if the century long journey would prepare the colonists for their new planet.

That also presumes that HD40307-G has a very similar structure as Earth. If its mantle or crust is less dense than earths or its core is smaller then its mass could vary significantly. Without knowing its actual (or rough) mass its difficult to predict its gravity. We can attempt to measure its impact on the other celestial bodies in its system but for all we know it could have a vast complex of voids beneath the surface that reduce its overall mass to one roughly equivalent to that of Earth and leaving it with a vary suitable environment for humans and earth plants.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well we know that a fetus cant form properly in zero-g so we would have to have some sort of simulated gravity for any multi generational space travel. And once you have that, having it increase over the course if the century long journey would prepare the colonists for their new planet.

That also presumes that HD40307-G has a very similar structure as Earth. If its mantle or crust is less dense than earths or its core is smaller then its mass could vary significantly. Without knowing its actual (or rough) mass its difficult to predict its gravity. We can attempt to measure its impact on the other celestial bodies in its system but for all we know it could have a vast complex of voids beneath the surface that reduce its overall mass to one roughly equivalent to that of Earth and leaving it with a vary suitable environment for humans and earth plants.

What he said.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Exactly He's played two seasons and started 28 games. He's well beyond the point of being able to point to 2 or 3 games and being able to say, "THAT is the QB he is and will be in the future" Of course he can get there, but anyone trying to use just those couple of games to rank his place amongst the games QB's today and their full career's worth of playing at that level, is just asinine. Mahomes, Allen, Lamar, Burrow, Hurts, Herbert, Daniels, Stafford, Goff, Geno, Purdy, Baker, Love, Dak, Tua, Kyler, Lawrence That's 17 QB's right there that have played better over their careers than Bryce has played at his best.  And I'm not saying they're all studs or guys I'd want to be our QB moving forward, Tua for example I wouldn't touch with a 10 foot pole, but his body of work is a million times better than Bryce's has been. It's also not including any of the other QB's drafted in 2023/2024 other than Daniels. So again, say you believe in Bryce, say you think he's going to prove he can and should be our QB of the future, that's all fair and totally fine. But nobody can say he's been an above average QB in his career thus far, it's just an asinine notion.
    • I'd think we could get one of those from Dallas for... whatever. 
×
×
  • Create New...