Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Bruce Arians is 5-1 as an interim head coach


frash.exe

Recommended Posts

No guarantee Pagano ever comes back. Its' cancer. Arians has always been a really good offensive mind. Great with the Browns in 2001-2002. Just a winner. Has the balls to take shots, total opposite of Ron who constantly tries to back into wins.

Biggest thing Colts have going for them other than Luck is they're playing with house money, no pressure. They know they're not supposed to be here and they're taking shots every week with reckless abandon. They're fun and good for the NFL. Love Reggie Wayne

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Meanwhile, our coach can't even outsmart coaches of other bad teams

Yea I'm somewhat agree with you on that part. I don't really like Chico as much as you do. Just saying the Colts are not as great as the record say they are.

And I rather have someone else than Arians. Their wins may have to do with players playing hard for Chuck Pagano or it could just be they're playin against weak teams. Well find out if they're that good when they meet twice with the Texans.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Let's make a thread about other coaches to make Rivera look worse! Great Idea man. Glad you thought of it.

Rivera has the rest of the season to improve this team or himself.

If I wanted to make Rivera look bad believe me there are much less time consuming things to do than create a thread in 3 minutes highlighting Bruce Arians

really all you have to do is mention his .333 winning percentage

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Bruce Arians said when evaluating a college prospect they have to win on 3rd down and in the 2 min drill to be successful in the nfl.
    • We took Luke when we had Jon Beason, and a hurt Jonathon Brooks when we had Chuba. Just noting.  I don't think teams are going to pass up on an impact player regardlessly if whether they need something else. There's a good argument that drafting an inferior player, and especially an obviously inferior player, based upon need is a pathway to failure.  I'm glad we took Tetairoa McMillan even though there were arguably bigger needs.
    • As much as I'd love Cam or Mahomes I'd also settle for a QB that is at least better than average at something other than 4th quarter comebacks/game winning drives. He's literally bottom third in the league in most categories (yards, completion percentage, int percentage/turnovers, YPA, IAYPA, QBR and QB rating) and right around average in a couple others, notably TD % where he is 15th and YAC/PA where he is 9th. If Bryce can improve I'll be happy with him. But all this stuff about us asking for perfection / insane ability is a bit ridiculous. Most of us "haters" just see a QB that is basically below average over his career to date and has shown relatively little consistency in his third year.  NFL offenses don't need 400 yards every week at all, but they do require a QB that can move the ball, and Bryce struggles often with that (hence why our overall offensive rank is so bad despite an overall good rushing rank).
×
×
  • Create New...