Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The Two Most Embarrassing Plays of The Day = The Reason Chud Should've Already Been Canned.


TylerDurden

Recommended Posts

QB Draw on 3rd down that Von Miller hit Cam on and made him fold and crumple up like a piece of wrapping paper on Christmas.

The read option to Stew in which Miller again hit Stew like he was a stationary tackling dummy and caused him to fumble.

Both plays branch off of the read option, or at least pose the threat of it before the snap... Both plays failed miserably. No way someone should be able to get a clean hit like that on Cam or Stew and bring them down that easily.

Not only has the read option been exposed for the gimmick that it is, but it greatly hinders and reduces our chances for success on each play with this offense. It slows down the momentum of both Cam and the RB due to the split second of hesitation it requires to sell the option. On pass plays, it removes most of the rhythm required for a QB to get comfortable, drop back, see the defense and throw. Cam can't dropback and read the defense that often because defenders are pushing upfield and collapsing in on the pocket due to the read option fake. By the time he drops back, the time he should've had to read a defense has been cut almost in half.

Just really amazed that Chud is still here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QB Draw on 3rd down that Von Miller hit Cam on and made him fold and crumple up like a piece of wrapping paper on Christmas.

The read option to Stew in which Miller again hit Stew like he was a stationary tackling dummy and caused him to fumble.

Both plays branch off of the read option, or at least pose the threat of it before the snap... Both plays failed miserably. No way someone should be able to get a clean hit like that on Cam or Stew and bring them down that easily.

Not only has the read option been exposed for the gimmick that it is, but it greatly hinders and reduces our chances for success on each play with this offense. It slows down the momentum of both Cam and the RB due to the split second of hesitation it requires to sell the option. On pass plays, it removes most of the rhythm required for a QB to get comfortable, drop back, see the defense and throw. Cam can't dropback and read the defense that often because defenders are pushing upfield and collapsing in on the pocket due to the read option fake. By the time he drops back, the time he should've had to read a defense has been cut almost in half.

Just really amazed that Chud is still here.

Great Post from a true panther Fan. Not these punkass trolls that have infested this site.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QB Draw on 3rd down that Von Miller hit Cam on and made him fold and crumple up like a piece of wrapping paper on Christmas.

The read option to Stew in which Miller again hit Stew like he was a stationary tackling dummy and caused him to fumble.

Both plays branch off of the read option, or at least pose the threat of it before the snap... Both plays failed miserably. No way someone should be able to get a clean hit like that on Cam or Stew and bring them down that easily.

Not only has the read option been exposed for the gimmick that it is, but it greatly hinders and reduces our chances for success on each play with this offense. It slows down the momentum of both Cam and the RB due to the split second of hesitation it requires to sell the option. On pass plays, it removes most of the rhythm required for a QB to get comfortable, drop back, see the defense and throw. Cam can't dropback and read the defense that often because defenders are pushing upfield and collapsing in on the pocket due to the read option fake. By the time he drops back, the time he should've had to read a defense has been cut almost in half.

Just really amazed that Chud is still here.

I agree Chud should be fired tonite but,

I believe Greg Olsen was blocking Miller on both those plays........................

and wiffed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The first scoring drive had some runs, some shorter passes to Olsen and some play action.

Then we abandoned all that completely.

Yup and I'm not saying Cam was faultless, he was at some points... But, I don't understand how any knowledgeable football fan can watch these games and say he's our problem. He's probably the second least behind our WRs.

It all starts with the playcalling.

The OL was again exposed for how horrible it was and got Cam pounded all day long. Chud compounds the problem because he is so stubborn and insists on going against the grain... He just kept running read option variations and passing plays with long developing routes.

Look at what Manning did. We took away all the deep stuff and look what he did... Dinked and dunked his way to like 17 of 18 passes in the first half. Then when the tide shifted he started taking his big shots.

It's simple. It only requires a fundamental understanding of football, which Chud apparently doesn't have.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree Chud should be fired tonite but,

I believe Greg Olsen was blocking Miller on both those plays........................

and wiffed.

I know it was Olsen's on the one when Cam got hit. The other one was Barnidge I believe. If we're talking about the same play, Barney totally whiffed on his block.

Olsen is a bad blocker. Barnidge makes Olsen look like Mike Ditka.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Should have kept running the RB screens til they backed the FUG up!!!

But that is another problem IMO. Yes, the screens worked but it was because Denver just didn't care if they gave them to us.

Chud just doesn't mix it up. We can't continually rely on a play that starts with a pass at the LOS or behind it to get us out of jams. He doesn't offer any variation... Why no slants? Drag routes? Spacing/hook routes? More passes coming out of a trips formation?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The thing I don't like about the read option is that the offensive line doesn't really know whether they're run-blocking or pass-protecting because the read is made during the play. It seems destined for failure.

It's a fumble or injury just waiting to happen every time

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Our only two successful drives had heavy doses of run, screens, passes to Olsen and other quick passes. When that was our gameplan we marched down the field. When he started calling these long developing plays they got blown up by the pass rush because the O-line can't sustain blocking for more than 1.5 seconds.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • okay I found this and it sounds like my hopes for the first surgery being not such a great job seems like it could be actual reality.  I only hoped because that would give a better chance for recovery and ia a possible scenario so I just thought it could be possible. Had no real evidence of it. But I’ll be damned.    This is a detailed report of Brooks’ surgery and the condition of his knee after the failed repair.     https://x.com/jmthrivept/status/2055743129408704806?s= Sparked by some very good questions by @CoachspeakIndex, here’s some info on Jonathon Brooks: 1. Speculation that the first graft/ACLR by Dr. Cooper didn’t “take” or at least was too lax, leading to failure and re-tear. Brooks dealt with issues cutting, progressing in his rehab into the early stages of 2024 and then re-tore it late 2024, requiring a second ACLR in January 2025 (essentially revision). Notably, CAR prolonged Brooks’ rehab process through Sept-Oct due to issues progressing into the next stages of rehab. 2. Second surgery performed by Dr. Neal ElAttrache, who has extensive experience with revisions. He did a double bundle technique, harvesting graft from Brooks’ left patellar tendon and a strip of his right IT Band (his right patellar tendon had been utilized for the prior graft in 2023. The double bundle technique significantly increases rotational stability of the knee, leading to a stronger and more secure graft/reconstruction. Also to note, Brooks’ surgery wasn’t significantly delayed, meaning that the tunnels from his prior ACLR were in good shape and they didn’t need to perform bone grafts to fill in (would have delayed 2nd surgery by 5-6 months). Essentially, reading the tea leaves tells me that everything else except for the graft itself was still in good quality within his knee. Good sign for future.  3. Typically, you see a performance increase anywhere from 16-20 months post-revision. Brooks will be ~21 months out from his second surgery by the time Week 1 hits. His knee should be more stable and stronger this time around, with adequate time for healing and return to all movement patterns. I’m not viewing this situation as a typical “Player __ had TWO ACL tears, he’s cooked” situation. Rather, I’m viewing it as the first procedure failed, but the second procedure is significantly stronger and should allow him to return to form this time around. I don’t know why it posted as a link but there it is.  
    • Jackie, any more reps tomorrow, or is that it for this session?  thanks for the work
    • How can you say they aren’t trying to win now with all the moves made in free agency? Or is trading first round picks the only way to be win now? I’d be fine never trading another first round pick again, win now be damned.
×
×
  • Create New...