Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

NASA EMPLOYEE SPEAKS ABOUT NIBIRU ? ? ?


KaseKlosed

Recommended Posts

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nibiru_cataclysm

Astronomers reject the idea of Nibiru, and have made efforts to inform the public that there is no threat to Earth in 2012.[19] They point out that such an object so close to Earth would be easily visible to the naked eye, as Jupiter and Saturn are both visible to the naked eye, and are dimmer than Nibiru would be at their distances. A planet such as Nibiru would create noticeable effects in the orbits of the outer planets.[20] Some counter this by claiming that the object has been concealed behind the Sun for several years, though this would be geometrically impossible.[12]Amateur photographs supposedly showing Nibiru near the Sun are usually the result of lens flares, false images of the Sun created by reflections within the lens.[21]

Astronomer Mike Brown notes that if this object's orbit were as described, it would only have lasted in the Solar System for a million years or so before Jupiter expelled it, and that there is no way another object's magnetic field could have such an effect on Earth.[22] Lieder's assertions that the approach of Nibiru would cause the Earth's rotation to stop or its axis to shift violate the laws of physics. In his rebuttal of Immanuel Velikovsky's Worlds in Collision, which made the same claim that the Earth's rotation could be stopped and then restarted, Carl Sagan noted that, "the energy required to brake the Earth is not enough to melt it, although it would result in a noticeable increase in temperature: The oceans would [be] raised to the boiling point of water ... [Also,] how does the Earth get started up again, rotating at approximately the same rate of spin? The Earth cannot do it by itself, because of the law of the conservation of angular momentum."[23]

In a 2009 interview with the Discovery Channel, Mike Brown noted that, while it is not impossible that the Sun has a distant planetary companion, such an object would have to be lying very far from the observed regions of the Solar System to have no gravitational effect on the other planets. A Mars-sized object could lie undetected at 300 AU (10 times the distance of Neptune); a Jupiter-sized object at 30,000 AU. To travel 1000 AU in two years, an object would need to be moving at 2400 km/s – faster than the galactic escape velocity. At that speed, any object would be shot out of the Solar System, and then out of the Milky Way galaxy into intergalactic space

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://en.wikipedia....ibiru_cataclysm

Astronomers reject the idea of Nibiru, and have made efforts to inform the public that there is no threat to Earth in 2012.[19] They point out that such an object so close to Earth would be easily visible to the naked eye, as Jupiter and Saturn are both visible to the naked eye, and are dimmer than Nibiru would be at their distances. A planet such as Nibiru would create noticeable effects in the orbits of the outer planets.[20] Some counter this by claiming that the object has been concealed behind the Sun for several years, though this would be geometrically impossible.[12]Amateur photographs supposedly showing Nibiru near the Sun are usually the result of lens flares, false images of the Sun created by reflections within the lens.[21]

Astronomer Mike Brown notes that if this object's orbit were as described, it would only have lasted in the Solar System for a million years or so before Jupiter expelled it, and that there is no way another object's magnetic field could have such an effect on Earth.[22] Lieder's assertions that the approach of Nibiru would cause the Earth's rotation to stop or its axis to shift violate the laws of physics. In his rebuttal of Immanuel Velikovsky's Worlds in Collision, which made the same claim that the Earth's rotation could be stopped and then restarted, Carl Sagan noted that, "the energy required to brake the Earth is not enough to melt it, although it would result in a noticeable increase in temperature: The oceans would [be] raised to the boiling point of water ... [Also,] how does the Earth get started up again, rotating at approximately the same rate of spin? The Earth cannot do it by itself, because of the law of the conservation of angular momentum."[23]

In a 2009 interview with the Discovery Channel, Mike Brown noted that, while it is not impossible that the Sun has a distant planetary companion, such an object would have to be lying very far from the observed regions of the Solar System to have no gravitational effect on the other planets. A Mars-sized object could lie undetected at 300 AU (10 times the distance of Neptune); a Jupiter-sized object at 30,000 AU. To travel 1000 AU in two years, an object would need to be moving at 2400 km/s – faster than the galactic escape velocity. At that speed, any object would be shot out of the Solar System, and then out of the Milky Way galaxy into intergalactic space

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Red Dwarf aka Nabiri will be impossible to see because it does not reflect any light. Its a cold, dead planet and the only way we can see is by feeling the destruction from gravitational pull. Aka... We can only discover it when poo hits the fan. I believe Nabiru exists and it passes through our solar system every 26,000 or so years. If you read greek and sumarian mythology then u know both cultures talked about 12 planets in our solar system but we only see 11 (including pluto) and 1 is still missing. What happened to the 12th planet? Also, number of asteroid flying toward earth increased almost 10 fold in last few years... Why? What takes these asteroids from outer space and shoots them toward earth at incredible speed?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Red Dwarf aka Nabiri will be impossible to see because it does not reflect any light. Its a cold, dead planet and the only way we can see is by feeling the destruction from gravitational pull. Aka... We can only discover it when poo hits the fan. I believe Nabiru exists and it passes through our solar system every 26,000 or so years. If you read greek and sumarian mythology then u know both cultures talked about 12 planets in our solar system but we only see 11 (including pluto) and 1 is still missing. What happened to the 12th planet? Also, number of asteroid flying toward earth increased almost 10 fold in last few years... Why? What takes these asteroids from outer space and shoots them toward earth at incredible speed?

can you explain how a physical body wouldn't reflect light? cold and dead still reflects light.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

can you explain how a physical body wouldn't reflect light? cold and dead still reflects light.

It was on Net Geo.. quanton physician explanted the whole thing in detail. We can see some cold planets because of the reflections from the sun, but sun light does not reach many planets so we cannot see these planets... NASA uses heat telescope to discover these planets... because many of the planets still have hot and active core. Problem arises when planet is dead (cold and no active core) and out of reach of sunlight... This planets can be the size of our sun or larger and can hang out just outside our solar system and we would have no idea. We can only discover these planets when thy coming too close to our solar system... when we do, it will be too late. These Red Dwarfs will move other planets off their axis and into collision corse with other planets... example: huge asteriod belt between Jupitor and Mars is all that remaining of 2 planets that colides long long time ago.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

whats odd is while flipping around the 200 plus cable channels last night I saw 2 different movies that were related to this. Both were just how people would react once they knew there were only a few hours on earth left.

causation/correlation stuffage? hmmm

*the films were Meloncholia(sp) and 4:44 Last day on earth or something like that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Holy poo... we have allowed the fewest goals in the playoffs, total. Including the teams that lost in the first round... lmao
    • It was nothing. It was a nice run in an easy schedule that did nothing but lose us DJ Moore and a lot more. We were 2-15 in 2023. Based on your logic, that winning finish should have been a launching point. For as much as you want to say we shouldn’t have taken a risk, you still can’t admit that the plans we tankers laid out were proven correct. There’s no revisionist history. We said we should have traded Burns to the Rams. We said we should have sold off anything not bolted down like Brown and Horn and even Icky because they were in the 5 year plan. There is no disconnect, we tried to keep winning and draft a rookie QB and we lost about 4 1st round picks of value that could have been given to the guys you think might be the right crew.
    • You’re assuming Fitt still gets fired at the same time. That’s the problem with all these hypothetical hindsight thoughts. If we had a fire sale so to speak I’m not sure the GM gets fired a year or two later due to a bad roster and bad record. Fitt went into win now mode, made it seem like we were only a QB away “we won’t drafting this high again” trading picks for vets etc and when he couldn’t show results he was fired. I’m sure this was all mentioned in his GM interviews. What’s his plan to turn us around and how quickly can he do it. Also you want last year’s CMC and Burns on our roster? At their price? Moving on from both was the right call, with Burns being the wrong time. If a team does a full roster strip down rebuild it can buy the GM more time as long as everyone is on the same page. 
×
×
  • Create New...