Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The Browns are closing in on Chip Kelly


Dpantherman

Recommended Posts

Hahaha Welp fellas, we missed out on Harbaugh and now look at the niners.

The Browns will be a totally different team now and become a force to be reckon with.

The situation Harbaugh conveniently walked into in San Francisco is like night and day in comparison to what Chip Kelly will soon inherit. We're talking the Browns here. I wish Kelly the best of luck, that's all I can say.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Kelly becomes HC of the Browns they will probably be improved in 2013 but i wouldn't expect them to be a playoff type team overnight. Remember,this is the Browns we're talking about.

The Browns actually have really good pieces on their team. The one position that they have lacked for the past decade though, just happens to be the most important on the field. If Kelly could find some QB, I think they could be decent, but finding one is going to be a nightmare.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You guys do realize the Browns have a new owner, right? They are being remade top to bottom.

I wouldn't assume they will continue to suck.

You're right, but it's going to be hard for them to win, because they have to find a QB.

But, that division is finally starting to age. Baltimore is old, as are the Steelers, and the Bengals looked like a mess most of this past season. Being a fast, up-tempo offense could really start to show the age of those teams.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They would beat out the Bengals, Steelers, AND Ravens? They all went to the playoffs last year and two are in this year.

Sure, Kelly will turn them around, but they won't make the playoffs.

didn't say they'd win the division...just make the playoffs.

steelers aren't much anymore. ravens are on the decline. bengals are the bengals.

and it's the AFC. it's not like they are a powerhouse of a conference.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hahaha Welp fellas, we missed out on Harbaugh and now look at the niners.

The Browns will be a totally different team now and become a force to be reckon with.

I doubt they will be next year. The Niners were a team with a lot of talent & a horrible HC.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You're right, but it's going to be hard for them to win, because they have to find a QB.

But, that division is finally starting to age. Baltimore is old, as are the Steelers, and the Bengals looked like a mess most of this past season. Being a fast, up-tempo offense could really start to show the age of those teams.

teams with new QBs rarely find success these days.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'll remember to bump this thread when the Browns and Chip Kelly have a better record than Ron Rivera and the Panthers.

The Browns are one of the only tems that have less tlaent on the roster than us

But I mean a coach will change all of that in one season okay if you say so Bwood.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Malcom Spence is the best player remaining, hope he’s there.
    • The era that you played in, and, more importantly, who you played with actually matters. Honestly, that's why these issues will be debated forever, as it's just difficult to say that this person or that person is better when you're discussing the passage of time. As for me, after Rice, Moss and maybe Megatron and T.O., there's probably a dozen or so guys that can be argued about to the cows come home. Personally, I'm not putting Fitz, Harrison, Johnson, Evans, or especially D-Hop, Jefferson, Chase or Hill definitely in front of Smitty (and Colston ain't even in the discussion). Context and all that stuff actually matters. Things like the triple crown matter. 
    • Some of those guys? Yeah honestly you can.  I would 100% take Steve Smith over Larry Fitzgerald, Harrison, even Mike Evans. He is 100% a better player than those guys in his prime. If you look at the numbers Smith is historically under targeted in comparison to his contemporaries. He was only targeted 150 times or more only once in his career. Fitzgerald for example was targeted well above that 9 different seasons. Had Smith played with Peyton, Brady, Greatest Show on Turf, or even with Warner in Arizona he would broken records. His 2008 season was ridiculous accumulating 1400 yards in 13 games on less than 80 receptions. All time he also lost a season due to injury in 04, barely played WR as a rookie. Got robbed of 1k season with Clausen. Thats easily another 1800yds minimum that should have been tacked on to his #s. The only guys I’d say for certain are better than Smith are Rice, Moss, TO, Megatron, Julio Jones, Antonio Brown.
×
×
  • Create New...