Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Jon Gruden wanted Panthers job with total control


Recommended Posts

Gruden's resume' is built primarily on one Super Bowl (won on the backs of Tony Dungy and Monte Kiffin).

Meh, go research what Dungy did in the Playoffs the years before Gruden got there with this Buc team and see why he was blown out in Tampa Bay.

Remember, the team Gruden beat in the Super Bowl? The Raiders, the team Gruden built and Bill Callahan road Gruden's back to the Super Bowl with. ;)

There is one difference between the Bucs and us, they have a Lombardi.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Funny thing about Kelly, Gruden.

They will be around next year if we need/want them still.

probably a couple other high profile HC candidates able to cherry pick their jobs who very well could have the panthers as the cherry they have their eye on.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Meh, go research what Dungy did in the Playoffs the years before Gruden got there with this Buc team and see why he was blown out in Tampa Bay.

Remember, the team Gruden beat in the Super Bowl? The Raiders, the team Gruden built and Bill Callahan road Gruden's back to the Super Bowl with. ;)

There is one difference between the Bucs and us, they have a Lombardi.

And you're okay with how he handled the team after that?

Specifically, okay enough to hand over total control of the franchise?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not full control

If he was smart, he shoulda just took the HC job and worked his way up

that's only if he didn't have a cush job somewhere else.

he's reached a place where he's obviously comfortable where he's at and doesn't need a job as a HC, but if he was able to build the team the way he wanted he'd do it.

he's doing it the smart way.

same with cowher if he's wanting control as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Especially if Gettleman can get the cap looking reasonable in the next 2 years.

absolutely and if he's a guy that can prove himself in cleaning up the cap and getting in some good talent then a prospective coach may not feel bad working with gettleman.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

that's only if he didn't have a cush job somewhere else.

he's reached a place where he's obviously comfortable where he's at and doesn't need a job as a HC, but if he was able to build the team the way he wanted he'd do it.

he's doing it the smart way.

same with cowher if he's wanting control as well.

Don't blame either one for wanting what they want.

I just wouldn't wanna be the guy that gives it to 'em.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't blame either one for wanting what they want.

I just wouldn't wanna be the guy that gives it to 'em.

if they can deliver i don't care how much control they have.

kraft gave belichick control over football operations really soon after he got the job and he didn't have that great of a record prior to that.

i just don't see what the big deal in letting an HC have control over personnel, which is essentially all belichick has and what any other HC wanting control wants. who knows best what players a coach needs than the coach? let him get the players he wants and let someone else handle the cap stuff.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And you're okay with how he handled the team after that?

Specifically, okay enough to hand over total control of the franchise?

Not advocating Gruden for the Panthers and no way with full control, that's a deal breaker.

But the 6 years following the Super Bowl win the Bucs did have 2 Playoff appearnces.

That's quite a bit better than what's been going on in Carolina lately.

Gruden did have one young QB with talent, that is until the Panthers removed his spleen, after that it was a mish mash of trash.

I think he'll probably be a good HC somewhere, but he's not my first choice, but if it was simply Rivera vs Gruden, Gruden it would be, HC responsibilities only however.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

if they can deliver i don't care how much control they have.

kraft gave belichick control over football operations really soon after he got the job and he didn't have that great of a record prior to that.

i just don't see what the big deal in letting an HC have control over personnel, which is essentially all belichick has and what any other HC wanting control wants. who knows best what players a coach needs than the coach? let him get the players he wants and let someone else handle the cap stuff.

My biggest issue is that not that many of the "total control" guys are ever all that successful. The ones who do are the exception, not the rule. Heck, outside of Belichick, who can you name that's won a Super Bowl in forever?

All head coaches have control over who makes the final roster, who starts and who sits. Generally speaking, nobody has issue with that.

When it comes to control over who to draft, who ti sign in free agency, whose contract to extend, etc. That's where the issues start.

Veteran personnel guys generally hate when the coach inserts himself too much into the process. They want input from the coaches for sure, but they also complain that coaches have a tendency to "fall in love" with a guy's highlight tape and not look at the big picture.

Bottom Line: In today's NFL there's just too much to handle. That's why the total control model generally isn't effective anymore.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Would've love it. Gruden has been working with draft prospects and especially the QBs, and on draft nights. The man is a "motivator" and someone who knows talents.

But I'm fine with Gettleman as GM and a "lame duck" coach in Chico for right now. I'm sure the Panthers were no.1 on Chip Kelly's list. If Chico dissapoint, Kelly's name will become a hot surface in Charlotte real soon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

MIke Holmgren did a fairly good job with GM/HC duties but it just takes too much out of one person.

It's just mandatory that any GM and HC be able to work together for a common goal and the marriage should be ok.

You cant have success with a toxic situation like what went on in San Diego with the AJ Smith/Schotty/Norv ordeal.

I'm not at all impressed either with Rivera's ability to translate the roster Hurney handed him with wins on the field.

Fox and Hurney had much closer philosipies apparently, Gettleman better make sure he and Rivera are on the same page or Rivera might not even last the year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I look at it like get on top of the situation. Stay ahead of it. If it costs you a year of not drafting a starter at number three WR in the first so be it. We need new blood there in 2027 if not 2026, and need to get some OL on rookie deals.   At the same time the big picture is considered, we have a QB that has yet to earn an extension and you can go glass half full if you want but he had about half the good games that he needed to have. Fewer, IMO, but the point is he is not a lock to earn an extension.    Which would really put next year’s number one in play for QB and take OT off the table. So I think it needs to be on the table this year.  
    • Feels like they just changed like 2 years ago.
    • https://www.pff.com/news/nfl-offensive-line-success-why-building-through-the-nfl-draft-is-the-key   Conclusions drawn This article took a deep dive into evaluating recent offensive line trends regarding the draft and free agency while incorporating team success into the equation. Here are the biggest takeaways:   The best offensive lines in football (PHI, DET, TB) were built through the draft in the early rounds Other teams (most notably LAC) are following the same approach in team building Offensive line is something a team should target in the early rounds (1-3), as the success rate significantly declines in the later rounds both in the short and long-term Offensive tackles have a higher success rate through the draft than interior offensive linemen, regardless of round Acquiring free agent offensive line does have its benefits, particularly for elite units filling one hole. Interior offensive is typically the way to go Top-end offensive line talent is far less likely to be available via trade or free agency compared to other positions year to year, only emphasizing the importance of the draft   My words: we were forced to make some big signings on interior after years of poor OL drafting and neglect. It worked but isnt sustainable. We need to get right. Drafting tackles high is a successful formula. We need to start now to have any hope going forward.  
×
×
  • Create New...