Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Beason a June 1st cut?


CRA

Recommended Posts

Would save us cap space this year....and if we cut Gamble (also cap savings) this year it would make 2014 essentially a wash in terms of cap impact with Beason's signing bonus taking up Gamble's 2014 savings, right?

Hurney really screwed us. 2014 being in such bad shape really handcuffs the "magic" we can pull off.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Beason would still count against our cap even if he's cut. We're not cutting Beason.

I am talking about creating cap space, of course he would still have an impact towards it in a cut. But a June 1 cut would create 2013 space right? It just throws a larger chunk toward 2014.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Luke is our MLB. The future of our D.

Beason is too expensive considering what he now is....

If anything, I rather cut Anderson. Would cutting Anderson help save any cap or are we going to take a hit?

And I read on PFT that we can carry a little over 3mill this upcoming season. Unlike Philly who has 23mill to carry over.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If anything, I rather cut Anderson. Would cutting Anderson help save any cap or are we going to take a hit?

And I read on PFT that we can carry a little over 3mill this upcoming season. Unlike Philly who has 23mill to carry over.

Anderson is healthy. That factors in. he isn't coming off back to back years of IR

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We should keep him. More good players on defense the better.

he hasn't been a good player on D in yearS.

Doubtful he will be in 2013. Odds against it.

His job is also gone, making him more of a situational LB

The fact he was a great player, leader, and rep of our franchise does get thrown out the window to a degree when looking forward. Sucks he got hurt. We can't afford to hold out hope like we did with Davis for multiple guys.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I don't necessarily think he will be moved, I would currently be leaning against that notion. I think a lot will depend on the coaching situation. Carroll certainly can't be thinking about wanting to go through a serious strip down and overhaul, so the longer he plans to remain, the less likely I think Crosby gets moved.
    • I think everyone says Mike Evans because of size, but really they have different strengths and play styles.  Tmac is better on intermediate routes and not nearly as good at contested catches. 
    • At this point, it is criminal to go into the 2026 training camp/OTA's with XL penciled in as a #2 WR. The team must upgrade, either through free agency or the draft. If he cannot give 100% effort on significantly less snaps as a #4-6 WR(players like Tremayne have done that consistently) then I don't think you have a player worth rostering beyond the trade deadline. Offensively, we eventually have to upgrade to an NFL starting caliber C. It's been almost the length of time from Gross to Ikey since Kalil retired and we have below average to terrible C play. Love Mays as a BC-esque utility backup but he will never be an above average long term starting C.  The TE room is one of the worst in the NFL but it's a low usage position in this offense, so the investments are likely to be small, if any. I would never expect to see an elite TE in a Dave Canales offense. 100% agree on OL depth. We actually aren't bad there but BC will be gone, Mays is a UFA, Corbett is a UFA and Zavala has been both injured and bad. We have to bolster that depth again or resign guys like Mays and Corbett to keep that depth somewhat stable.
×
×
  • Create New...