Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Big Beezy's Mock Draft & FA Signings 1.0


BigBeezy

Recommended Posts

Here's my first attempt of how I think offseason could play out after cuts and restructures:

Free Agency

Re-sign DT Dwan Edwards-played well for us last year (Alternative: Chris Canty)

Sign NT Sammie Lee Hill- stuck behind Suh & Fairley, could start at NT( Alternative: Terrence Knighton)

Sign S Kenny Phillips-relatively young, quality safety when healthy. (Alternative: Patrick Chung)

Sign CB Greg Toler- Under the radar. Has starting experience. (Alternative: Keenan Lewis)

Sign G Donald Thomas- Can play all 3 interior line spots. Could start at RG (Alternative: Kevin Boothe)

Sign OL Geoff Schwartz-Compete with Bell for spot at RT, can also play G (Alternative: King Dunlap)

Sign TE Dustin Keller**- Caveat: **only make this signing, if available on a 1-yr 'prove it' deal

Sign WR Dominek Hixon**- Caveat:**See Dustin Keller explanation

Draft

1st- Sheldon Richardson, DT, Missouri- Wanted to take Johnson or Rhodes here but both will probably be gone to San Diego (11th) and Tampa Bay (13th), respectively. Richardson will probably be BPA at this point, which is not a bad thing. (Other options: G Jon Cooper, WR Keenan Allen, CB Desmond Trufant)

2nd- Justin Hunter, WR, Tennessee- He may be gone at this point but I'm going with him based on current projections. Would be a great complement to current crop of WRs (Other options: WR Nuk Hopkins, CB Jordan Poyer, NT Brandon Williams (if we don't go DT in the 1st))

4th- Shamarko Thomas, S, Syracuse- This is a deep safety class so somebody will fall. Thomas is a big hitter with great measurables and has the ability to cover slots in nickel packages. (Other options: DB Brandon McGee, OG/C Brian Schwenke, another S that might fall)

5th- DJ Hayden, CB, Houston- Kid is a 2nd round talent that may fall due to injury concerns but would be worth the gamble here or maybe even the 4th. (Other options: S TJ McDonald, OT Brennan Williams)

6th- Kwame Geathers, NT, Georgia- May not last this long but it's where he's currently projected. Has great size but is still raw and will need time to develop. Adds depth to the DL and could contribute in a rotation in run/goal line situations. (Other options: OL Travis Bond, S Ray Ray Armstrong, K Caleb Sturgis)

Let me know what you think.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With the cap having risen to $123.9 mil, and Gettleman slowly but surely chipping away at it we might be able to have a decent FA period. I doubt we could sign all those mentioned in the OP, but certainly more than I was expecting going into this offseason.

Your mock is nice, I'd definitely be happy with it, but like KKL said I don't think Hunter will be available with our 2nd. I think our best chance at getting him (which I would love to do) is with a trade like the one mentioned in the SF-Revis thread where we get SF's 1st and #34 for our 1st (and maybe a throwaway pick) and then take Hunter at #34.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's weird how everyone's saying every wr won't fall. What's unique about this draft class is that the wr talent isn't a sure thing. With so many teams drafting bpa a wr may not get picked up till the middle of round 1. The second best wr may last until near the end of round 1, with other talent rated higher on teams draft boards. Unless the second round is nearly all wide receivers, SOMEONE will fall to us. Hunter is reasonable given his injury, teams may be scared away in the early second.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Difference is Hunter is a ready made WR. Hill was a project.

not ready made. still has to get stronger and physical, work on his route running and catching the ball. difference is one has played in a WCO while the other played in a triple option/wing t offense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

not ready made. still has to get stronger and physical, work on his route running and catching the ball. difference is one has played in a WCO while the other played in a triple option/wing t offense.

It's a difference in working on your route running then having to learn all the routes in the tree as a whole.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's a lot of FA with little money GettleMagic I guess. Hunter won't be at the 44th pick.

Thanks for the feedback.

Question: who on that FA list is breaking the bank? I believe we'll have money to sign some mid-level FA.

Hunter may not be there at 44 but it's not a guarantee that he won't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Too much on the FA. Many guys who are top 5 at their respective positions...Could I see Phillips and either Dwan or Hill...yes, but not both with Toler...What a fuging hall and draft class though good googly moogly, I would fuging faint.

Thanks for the feedback.

Questions: So you think we're only gonna sign two guys in FA? And who on this list is top 5 at their position?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • No, you're right. It doesn't mean you can't call out his flaws and poor play. But it also doesn't mean you can't admit when he plays well and shows improvement. Not you personally, just in general I mean.
    • I will say, I do think there's a version of Bryce that could be really successful as a high-volume passer in a spread-based offense built around quick throws and timing-based intermediate throws with deeper throws schemed up around them. I actually think the power run based offense we're running is a poor fit for Bryce as it requires him to play under center far more often. It's a very traditional offensive approach whereas I think a scheme that spreads defenses out and lets Bryce distribute the ball quickly with anticipation and accuracy is the sweet spot for him. The key, of course, is to find a way to run the ball efficiently out of those formations. Our personnel right now (backs and OL) aren't good fits for that style of offense and I'm not sure it's a scheme Dave Canales favors very much either.
    • I root for him, and I hope for the best, as does essentially everyone. But that doesn’t mean you can’t call out flaws and bad plays. And that’s what a lot of people get wrong.  I hope I’m wrong and that he continues to improve a lot, I just doubt it. But I’ve been wrong before 
×
×
  • Create New...