Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Matthias' Visionary Mock (Post Combine)


Matthias

Recommended Posts

Because it feel like we are always working without a third round pick, trading back always seems like the answer. With this particular mock draft I have here, I'm going to do something special. I have a feeling many of you will want to smack me upside my head with this one, but that is just a risk I'm going to have to take. (Course yall know how I roll with mine) B) In this draft, I'm doing the unthinkable. I'm going to trade back, out of the first round!

Now let me explain. This particular draft isn't flashy like the one last year, where you had all these can't miss prospects within the top 15 picks. (Andrew Luck, Robert Griffin III, Trent Richardson, Matt Kalil, Luke Kuechly, etc.) However, pretty much throughout the first two rounds, you can find solid starters. Within the first three rounds, we only have two draft picks, and both are in areas where we might just miss good players that are drafted two or three spots ahead. Then obviously we don't have a third round pick. So instead of sitting there at 14, let's trade it for a boat load of picks within the second round, a third, and an extra 4th. So here is my offseason post combine....

Free Agency

Louis Vasquez

Position: Guard

Height: 6'5"

Weight: 335

Vasquez will be our big signing. We should be able to clear up a good bit of cap space to make him a decent offer. Even though Vasquez is looking to get a little payday, teams can make the argument that he has no probowls on his resume, and overall the offense he played in wasn't all that great. This should only be a decent contract we give him, and not a bank breaker.

Quentin Jammer

Position: Cornerback

Height: 6'0"

Weight: 204

A veteran corner who shouldn't cost much. With this signing, our transition to the Carolina Chargers is complete.

Chris Canty

Position: DT

Height: 6'7

Weight: 317

I'm being optimistic here. Maybe Gettlemen can manage some stuff with the cap, that will allow us to bring in Canty. Maybe Canty will take less money to play here if we can convince him we will compete for a championship.

Resignings

Dwan Edwards- Again I'm being optimistic. He's a veteran who just had his best season. Yet some of that credit goes to our two monster DEs. Perhaps he will take a decent contract to remain a Panther. So in all, we have two decent contracts, one veteran contract, and one that perhaps can be managed.

Draft trade

Miami Dolphins get: 14th overall pick

Carolina Panthers get: 2 2nd round picks, 3rd round pick, and a 4th round pick

This will allow us to have three 2nd round picks. One very early which allows us to draft someone who falls out of the first round. Another in the early mid range, and the last one where the Colts would be picking in the second. (Miami got the Colts second rounder when they traded away Vontae Davis) Plus we have the Dolphins early third rounder (allowing us to snag a player who falls out of the second round) and early 4th. In reality, if you count those early picks in the next round as players that fell out of the previous round, it will be like having a late 1st round pick, 3 2nd round picks, and a late third round pick. Now that is forward thinking!

NFL Draft

2nd round pick: Matt Elam

rn_u_mattelam_ms_400.jpg

More and more as the days get closer to the draft, I'm starting to like this kid. I already knew he was a great tackler and hard hitter, a solid guy to have in the secondary. My thing was can he ball hawk? When it came to this skill, I found Bacarri Rambo was the best out of this class. Yet Elam's demeanor on the field along with his resume scream at me "I'm a top safety for the next 10 years". So I then ask myself is Elam a good enough ball hawk for me to take over Rambo? The answer to that is a definite yes. His stats support it, and he looks like he would be good for 5 ints a year along with 3-4 forced fumbles. This is exactly what we need in our secondary.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

However, it must be said that the trade is a bit unrealistic. I don't see the Dolphins trading their next 4 picks for our 1st. Who would they be trading back up for?

The Dolphins have an extra third, so they would still have three picks within the first three rounds. What makes it even between both teams would be the fact we wouldn't have a first in return for our first. I think it's about right, as 14 overall is a high spot, still within the top half of the first round.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oday Aboushi, the guy systematically pegged as a right tackle only due to his lack of athleticism, is now a prototypical LT?

That being said, the idea of trading out of the first for two second round picks is interesting. There's still a lot of talent in the second, and that would allow us to amass it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I never thought about trading out of the first. Interesting indeed. That being said I wouldn't mind this I like the two receiver LOVE slay. I don't love Lester you could go project DT there and I don't like the jammer pick up. I don't think we will have the cash and I like our young secondary.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not saying it's uneven, I assume you did the values and they're relatively close. I'm just saying I don't think the Dolphins would give up that package of picks to move up to #14 because I don't see anyone there a team would be that desperate for.

The Dolphins have an extra third, so they would still have three picks within the first three rounds. What makes it even between both teams would be the fact we wouldn't have a first in return for our first. I think it's about right, as 14 overall is a high spot, still within the top half of the first round.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Many Panthers fans are already excited about second-round selection Nic Scourton for a variety of reasons including but not limited to: the Panthers needed to recharge the position group, Scourton had a late first-round grade according to many (including the Panthers), and he fit this season's modus operandi of stopping the run now and forever. However, Scourton was seen early on as one of the top-3 EDGE guys in this class but fell due to not having quite the season at Texas A&M as he did prior at Purdue (his sophomore season). It's been revealed since then a few different things that speak to that dip in production... Texas A&M, for one, requires each player on their line to be able to hold two gaps. This also explains why we saw low production across the board from the other two TA&M prospects but were still being heavily touted. Scourton was also said to have bulked up to 280lbs in order to fulfill this role and noticeably suffered from it. He's expected to play this season with Carolina at 255 - 260 which is very different from most situations. In most situations, teams are wanting players to gain 15 - 30. Since Scourton is going to be playing at his Purdue weight, I thought it would make sense to dive more into that tape. Y'all... we might have gotten something special... Let's take a quick peek at the stats before we start drooling over some highlights. First, a summary of the last two seasons for Scourton: Second, the game splits: The first thing that pops up for me is how Scourton's sack numbers were cut in half his senior year. We've already pointed out issues with scheme that impacted the TA&M linemen from racking up numbers, but seeing the game splits it's clear that Scourton didn't exactly feast on inferior competition while at Purdue. He had two two-sack games (vs. Michigan (2023 - 2024 champs), Indiana) and a 10-tackle game (vs. Nebraska). I also see the 2024 games where he went up against two top-10 tackles (Will Campbell from LSU + Armand Membou from Missouri) that I watched leading up to the draft.  For those who just want a summary: Scourton looked elite at Purdue and is going to be rotating in often during his rookie campaign. I originally had him penciled in as the second-string, strong-side edge defender behind Clowney but I wouldn't be surprised to see the team have him and Pat Jones II moving around when they rotate in in order to find where Nic looks best. Here's a highlight reel to replace that Cialias you lost in your recliner tonight:   For those that like to use their own eyes: Below I'll be linking the linking the five games I've mentioned above. If you plan to watch all of them, I highly recommend going in the order listed as that will allow you to see him vs. Campbell and then Membou while dealing with the aforementioned things he dealt with at Texas A&M before seeing him look unstoppable in 2023 when he was allowed to play both at a comfortable weight and in a scheme that didn't require him two cover two gaps nearly every play. vs. Will Campbell (2024) vs. Armand Membou (2024) vs. Nebraska (2023) vs. Michigan (2023)   vs. Indiana (2023)  
    • Yea, i honestly think he had almost as much say as Dan.  One of the main reasons I think that is Eager has said before he was ever with the Panthers, that you trade away picks for a qb and for any other position you do pick swaps, and that's exactly what we did.
    • For a LB that is a long career.  They take a beating.  Shoulders and head.  My favorite LB of All Time--Junior Seau--had a 20-year career--the average career for a STARTING MLB is 5.6 years.  I really think Shaq is done, but if he can play, it does not mean that he should.   Think about Morgan's career--7 seasons.  Luke's career--8 seasons.  Beason played only 93 games over 10 years--only 5 seasons where he played 15 games or more.  The other 5 seasons?  No more than 5 games per.  So basically, the average starting MLB plays 90 games in his career.  Shaq has played 123 games and was pretty injury free until the last 2 seasons (6 games total). 
×
×
  • Create New...