Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

DT Jenkins signed with Giants...


PantherPhann89

Recommended Posts

I mentioned this in another thread but I believe that the FO is focused on re-signing Dwan Edwards as our vet DT and the Jenkins deal (3 yrs., $8 mil w/ $3 mil guaranteed) just set the market for what it will cost to re-sign him or possibly pick up Canty i.e. vet DTs 30 yo+ with similar production.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've seen a couple of separate articles now where DT Sen'Derrick Marks from the Titans has become a bit of a hot commodity. And I don't quite understand it.

Don't get me wrong, I like the kid a lot since he's an Auburn guy, its just that he's done nothing special since he entered the league. The highest grade I could give him would be solid, middle-of-the-pack player.

Is decent DT play now so valued that if you're an average player the doesn't get dominated on a regular basis, you're a "hot" commodity?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I mentioned this in another thread but I believe that the FO is focused on re-signing Dwan Edwards as our vet DT and the Jenkins deal (3 yrs., $8 mil w/ $3 mil guaranteed) just set the market for what it will cost to re-sign him or possibly pick up Canty i.e. vet DTs 30 yo+ with similar production.

I'd like to have Dwan back, he played his but off for us.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I mentioned this in another thread but I believe that the FO is focused on re-signing Dwan Edwards as our vet DT and the Jenkins deal (3 yrs., $8 mil w/ $3 mil guaranteed) just set the market for what it will cost to re-sign him or possibly pick up Canty i.e. vet DTs 30 yo+ with similar production.

Was coming to post the same thing. The news is not significant in the sense that we missed out on him, rather that it sets the market as you said. Dwan should not expect that much.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hello, soccer fans [crickets, tumbleweed flies by]. The World Cup kicks off in less than 2 weeks and, well, 🇺🇸USA USA USA🇺🇸 and all. We beat Senegal 3-2 yesterday in a tune-up friendly at BoA, with Christian Pulisic finally entering the scoring column.  How will we do in the World Cup once our tournament kicks off on the 12th? Well, there are 48 teams (assuming Iran is there) and it feels like one of two thing happens: we get grouped for the first time since '98, or we make it to the Round of 16 for the third time in the last four World Cups. I tried out the lottery for an Atlanta game and struck out, so yesterday was as World Cup as I'll get for in-person ($285/ticket for like Norway vs $39/ticket for USMNT right beforehand was a layup).  The U.S. has a travel-heavy schedule in group play, playing in LA, Seattle and LA. Real road warrior mentality being built. Glad the east coast gets worse kickoff times for a NA World Cup than a Qatar World Cup.
    • Well, that's the thing. Drafting players only for their physical measurables as you are suggesting only really happened during 2024, and X unfortunately has become the poster child for that. To be clear, it's not necessarily about drafting RAS over skill, but RAS over NFL-readiness and/or a solid body of work. Lots of players show skill in college, but those skills don't necessarily translate to the NFL for a multitude of reasons. But, getting back to the main point, to be clear, I believe that our FO is still enamored with physical gifts (who wouldn't be?), but now they're letting Dr. Eric Eager's proprietary system--his "secret sauce" prioritize the players that the Panthers draft, and it seems like it weighs not only a solid body of work, relative to a college career of course, but consistent gradual improvement as evidenced by production pretty highly. 
    • Its a good article about how pathetically bad our past drafts ('23 and '24) have been. Building the team in '23 since we weren't ready yet and taking your qb in '24 made so much more sense in hindsight. Ladd McConkey over XL is pretty much a given but not sure it does as much to change Bryce's trajectory as the author suggests.  As bad as '23 and '24 drafts were, the '25 and '26 really give me hope.  
×
×
  • Create New...