Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

MAYOCK'S mock: Disappointing

carolina-chuck

By carolina-chuck,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

carolina-chuck Newbie

carolina-chuck

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Speaking of Hunter, why in the world arent we considering him?! 6'4 and 4.44 speed. Look at Stephen Hill, he was very "raw" but had those same measurables and he was pretty solid. I liked Hopkins but that whole crapping on the floor is just hard to overcome. I know we arent the Raiders.. But if you have a healthy 6'4 WR with 4.44 speed staring you in the face, you draft him

Hunter is a much better prospect that Hill.

The reason why we or the other top 15 teams arent considering him may be due to him not having a better season last year at Tenn. Hunter's previous injury may scare some teams away too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
MrBubba Mentor

MrBubba

Posted
Posted

Let me update watching NFLN earlier. They were running analyst mocks on screen they had Casserly name and had us taking Richardson over Star. Just went to NFL.com and saw Casserly mock from 19th and us taking fluker and star in top ten. Don't know if he has new mock or network confused it with Charles Davis or I read it wrong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
carpanfan96 Grand Master

carpanfan96

Posted
Posted

Hunter has some of the same question marks as Patterson, with out the unnatural explosiveness with the ball in his hands. Hunter's a better jump ball guy, but there's some question marks about his route running and catching ability. He had one of the highest drop percentages of the Wr in the draft.

However Hunter has moved up the boards a bit and should be a first round pick though. Either right before Patterson or right after him, both should go in the 16-25ish range in the draft.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • PanthersATL
      Schedule Release: Leaks and Rumors

      By PanthersATL · Posted

      generally speaking, going by the original NFL international marketing rights announcement... we would expect to host a Germany home game once every four years.  Doesn't mean we would play internationally only then, just the guarantee home game situation things might have changed since then, if they figure out how to play at more stadiums during a season to expand the number of "home" teams available
    • PanthersATL
      Schedule Release: Leaks and Rumors

      By PanthersATL · Posted

      Munich won't happen. It's a Lions home game in Munich, but we play the Lions at home at BOA Most likely to happen would be Madrid vs the Falcons (although KC has been pushing hard for this one). From a schedule perspective, it would be interesting to have an early November Madrid game (then the bye week), then close out the season at BOA for the 2nd game vs the falcons.  In other words, put the two division games in the 2nd half of the season Paris vs the Saints has long been rumored to be the Browns (but... never say never) We wouldn't play Munich, Melbourne, Mexico City, London, or Rio based on who those announced home teams happen to be  
    • rebelrouser
      Rookie Mini Camp

      By rebelrouser · Posted

      Moton's knees were an issue before last season. He will be 32 before the season starts and gets 14.2M in '26 and 21.5M for '27 (not guaranteed). LT Icky and Rasheed Walker are signed through '26 and Freeling through '30 (option); LG Lewis signed through '28, C Fortner through '26 and Hecht through '29; RG Hunt through '28, RG Moton through '27.  They did a good job shoring up that oline.  We can have a starting oline of: LT Freeiling, LG Lewis, C Hecht, RG Hunt, and RT Moton pretty much locked up through the '27 season (will just take a Moton option to do). That's good because we need to be ready to pull the trigger with next year's QB class.  
×
×
  • Create New...