Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Cam wants a run game


jtnc

Recommended Posts

He also reports  to Richardson every week .....Richardson may have other interest but i'm pretty sure this football team is also a business and he has important hand in lot of the work  we may not know or is reported...........the only thing Gettleman is going to have say in is the final 53 roster and dealing with the team financially ........find the link where he has coaching influence...

So if the boss tells his supervisor that we are going to change directions and instead of focusing on overseas sales we are going to concentrate on domestic sales, is that going to impact the supervisor's coaching to the salesforce??

 

In like fashion when gettleman said we were going to use the read option less and focus on having newton being a pocket passer he was telling Rivera how the play calling would change.  You can be sure that Richardson is in agreement with it or is letting Gettleman do it his way. 

 

Gettleman by the nature of telling what Rivera what he wants to see is influencing the way Rivera coaches. It doesn't take a genius to see that. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

you're taking rushing stats, not number of read option plays. and before you say "that's not cam rushing," that is giving cam the opportunity to rush based on what the defense gave him. that is limiting him as a passer. as well as the fake read option to pass. obviously our oline couldn't handle it.

 

Marguide came out with a chart last year that showed read option plays compared from first half to second half of the season.  obviously first half was significantly more.  our inefficiencies in the "first four games" as you said, (even though i believe it to be longer because of the fake read option/pass plays, and lining up in those formations a hell of a lot more) comes down to the read option plays which are basically designed runs for cam, essentially. He is a quarterback that is why i think that.

 

You just taking rushing stats doesn't give a whole lot of credence to the overall picture in how we designed and ran our plays for the first half of the season.  now i agree with you completely that Cam needs to be Cam and know when to take off and when to sit in the pocket. Sometimes i think he runs when he shouldn't, sometimes i think he throws when he should run. no qb is perfect. but the read-option wasn't just used too much in the first four games. It was used too much and situationally was awful for the first 6 or 7 games. imo.

 

the key is not lining up in the read option formation as much as we did in the first half, which in turn will cause Cam to have less rushes. which means that Cam will be running less. and once again o-line play will have a large effect on how much cam runs as well.

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

over and over, it seems to me that CRA makes good sense on this issue.  I just don't see how Cam passing more in the pocket doesn't give him more room to escape and get yards if it's there, and the defense is smothering every receiver.

 

it's just going to happen from time to time throughout each quarter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So if the boss tells his supervisor that we are going to change directions and instead of focusing on overseas sales we are going to concentrate on domestic sales, is that going to impact the supervisor's coaching to the salesforce??

In like fashion when gettleman said we were going to use the read option less and focus on having newton being a pocket passer he was telling Rivera how the play calling would change. You can be sure that Richardson is in agreement with it or is letting Gettleman do it his way.

Gettleman by the nature of telling what Rivera what he wants to see is influencing the way Rivera coaches. It doesn't take a genius to see that.

In the NFL.....if a GM wants a real change in direction......they bring in a new coach and they bring in a QB that fits it.

GM inherited Rivera and Cam...and he isn't a coach. Either Rivera/Cam sink or swim this year. Then the GM makes his move. GM doesn't control the O and QB with coaching....he does it with hiring and firing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cam ran more in the 2nd half of 2012 than first half....

You ignore that tidbit....

That was with the "Shula" credited shift in offense....with less read option.

You could remove the read option all together.....Cam still runs. I have been on record 100 times saying the read option will be more like 2011 than 12. An option....nothing we have seen with a very limited read option is backed by Cam running less.

Again what does 2012 have to do with 2013?  Gettleman was not here so anything we did last year was  Rivera's idea given we didn't even have a general manager to give Rivera advice (unless you can Beane a GM).  Last year we deemphasized the read option somewhat and went to a more traditional system. But Chud was still the OC and obviously still ran Newton as much as he did.This year Rivera said after talking to Gettleman and getting his advice, that we will further deemphasize the read option and make Newton even more of a pocket passer and focus on a traditional running game.

 

Shula helped simplify the offense in 2012 but is doing even more to simplify it now that he is in charge.  He said he is going to a more traditional power running game which is a change from last year.  I believe him so honestly I don't know why we would look at what we did under a different OC to determine what we will do this year.    Last year was Chud's offense that Shula helped simplify.  This year it is Shula's offense that he has already told us would be similar but different in some areas.  Two of those I am convinced will be how much Newton runs and what they use as their base formations.

 

But this is classic CRA.  20 pages saying the same thing over and again and when he is wrong again we might get one post takinng back what we all had to suffer through for 5 months.  Good thing this is the offseason with nothing else going on.  

Let see what happens.  I already know I will be right so I can wait for verification. I  just am not going to keep arguing with someone who never admits they are wrong and argues for pages despite being out in left field.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the key is not lining up in the read option formation as much as we did in the first half, which in turn will cause Cam to have less rushes. which means that Cam will be running less. and once again o-line play will have a large effect on how much cam runs as well.

Again though, 2012....

Cam had MORE rush attempts the last 8 games than the first. That was with significantly less zone read looks.

Reality of last year, doesn't back that

Link to comment
Share on other sites

allow me to clarify, all of you have spent 20 pages arguing.

 

the "system" isn't going to be so black and white that the GM affects playcalling so much as what the defense gives them as a whole.  Fact is, one game Cam may stay in the pocket and the next have gaping holes to run through...

 

anything else is just arguing to argue.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Again though, 2012....

Cam had MORE rush attempts the last 8 games than the first. That was with significantly less zone read looks.

Reality of last year, doesn't back that

 

because of shoddy o-line play. cam had more opportunities to run in the first half. that to me is the difference. we fix the o-line and run less read option, cam runs less.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In the NFL.....if a GM wants a real change in direction......they bring in a new coach and they bring in a QB that fits it.

GM inherited Rivera and Cam...and he isn't a coach. Either Rivera/Cam sink or swim this year. Then the GM makes his move. GM doesn't control the O and QB with coaching....he does it with hiring and firing.

The GM picks a coach who reflects his philosophy and who will do what he wants. Gettleman has already said that Rivera and he are on the same page and have a similar philosophy.  Gettleman has already told us what the coaching philosophy will be.  The changes Gettleman wants are to have Cam stay in the pocket, use the running backs more which is why he kept both Williams and  Stewart, and do what they did in New York.

it doesn't matter whether Rivera was picked by him or not.  They are on the same page they are going to do what Gettleman wants done and that is really it.  GMs do a lot more than hire and fire.  Gettleman hs said he has the last word on everything. Not just hiring and firing.

Only a fool for a coach would vary from what Gettleman says to do given that he is on the hot seat and Gettleman is surely not. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Again what does 2012 have to do with 2013? Gettleman was not here so anything we did last year was Rivera's idea given we didn't even have a general manager to give Rivera advice (unless you can Beane a GM). Last year we deemphasized the read option somewhat and went to a more traditional system. But Chud was still the OC and obviously still ran Newton as much as he did.This year Rivera said after talking to Gettleman and getting his advice, that we will further deemphasize the read option and make Newton even more of a pocket passer and focus on a traditional running game.

Shula helped simplify the offense in 2012 but is doing even more to simplify it now that he is in charge. He said he is going to a more traditional power running game which is a change from last year. I believe him so honestly I don't know why we would look at what we did under a different OC to determine what we will do this year. Last year was Chud's offense that Shula helped simplify. This year it is Shula's offense that he has already told us would be similar but different in some areas. Two of those I am convinced will be how much Newton runs and what they use as their base formations.

But this is classic CRA. 20 pages saying the same thing over and again and when he is wrong again we might get one post takinng back what we all had to suffer through for 5 months. Good thing this is the offseason with nothing else going on.

Let see what happens. I already know I will be right so I can wait for verification. I just am not going to keep arguing with someone who never admits they are wrong and argues for pages despite being out in left field.

What do the facts and reality of Rivera, Cam, Shula have to do with anything.....nothing per you.

Yes, Shula helped simplify and change our offense if reports are correct......and again, Cam ran MORE the 2nd half. You keep acting like that supports Cam running less.

No one will be proven right or wrong until the season plays out....but like always you ink in your opinion on things as the ultimate fact. Just like when we debated the RBs and you argued against me every time I said we should pick one, pay him, and move on from the other. Just like when you said Jake shouldn't of been benched in 2009.

Difference between you and I is I know I go on and on stubbornly on issues. You somehow fail to overlook you are also posting the same thing over and over and over. Classic CRA, huh.....55 doesn't realize he is me from the opposite side of the argument all too often.

And again, last time you claimed I never admit to be wrong I gave you an example of me being wrong immediately.....you on the other hand....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Again though, 2012....

Cam had MORE rush attempts the last 8 games than the first. That was with significantly less zone read looks.

Reality of last year, doesn't back that

Who was OC last year?  Who is OC this year?? What does last year have to do with this?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Difference between you and I is I know I go on and on stubbornly on issues. You somehow fail to overlook you are also posting the same thing over and over and over. Classic CRA, huh.....55 doesn't realize he is me from the opposite side of the argument all too often.

 

Difference is that I argue for a page or two and quit. You go on and on and when no one argues, you try to bait people into arguing.  Then you start psting the same thing in every thread.  when  that isn't enough, you make up new threads to argue your point. 

 

You argue with everyone and the common denominator is you.  Don't put me in the same boat with you. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The GM picks a coach who reflects his philosophy and who will do what he wants. Gettleman has already said that Rivera and he are on the same page and have a similar philosophy.  Gettleman has already told us what the coaching philosophy will be.  The changes Gettleman wants are to have Cam stay in the pocket, use the running backs more which is why he kept both Williams and  Stewart, and do what they did in New York.

it doesn't matter whether Rivera was picked by him or not.  They are on the same page they are going to do what Gettleman wants done and that is really it.  GMs do a lot more than hire and fire.  Gettleman hs said he has the last word on everything. Not just hiring and firing.

Only a fool for a coach would vary from what Gettleman says to do given that he is on the hot seat and Gettleman is surely not.

Rivera needs to win....taking away Cam's legs greatly reduces those chances. Cam is largely the reason we where in almost all 32 games of his career. Arm and legs.

Only a fool would take Cam Newton at this stage of his career and think his game should resemble Eli's...I don't think you fully credit Cam for how impactful his legs have been.

And no, out first year GM.....doesn't have the last word on everything. He doesn't even have final say on coaches. Jerry Richardson wouldn't even allow him to be in a position to debate hot Rivera's fate. Again, he is a GM. He has limitations.....he isn't this all powerful man who is going to be more coach, QB coach, O coordinator you paint him as.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

allow me to clarify, all of you have spent 20 pages arguing.

 

the "system" isn't going to be so black and white that the GM affects playcalling so much as what the defense gives them as a whole.  Fact is, one game Cam may stay in the pocket and the next have gaping holes to run through...

 

anything else is just arguing to argue.

The GM determine philosophy and direction which means he bring in the players that he and Rivera want.  They discuss how they will be used and what we will do. As you note weekly gameplanning will determine what we run.  Not just from what the defense gives us but our personnel which changes based on injuries and what we are doing well.  As long as things go well Gettleman will let Rivera run things.  But if  they don't expect Gettleman to get a lot more involved just like Rivera did in 2012 when the defense struggled in 2011. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Wow, didn't catch that!  I don't think Chuba's a power back either but he's usually good at getting that 1 or 2 yards. That was an uncharacteristic day for him.
    • The referee assigned to this game is Shawn Smith. This is a critical data point for betting purposes because his crew has one of the most distinct, long-term statistical biases in the NFL. "Road Team" Bias: Historically, Shawn Smith is known as the "Road Team Referee." In a league where home teams usually win ~55% of the time, home teams in Smith's games have historically won at a rate far below league average (often hovering around 40-42%). Against The Spread (ATS): The trend is even starker here. Home teams have covered the spread at a rate of roughly 37-40% in his career. The Mechanism: Analysis shows his crew tends to call a higher rate of False Start and Unnecessary Roughness penalties on the Home Team. This negates the traditional home-field advantage (crowd noise causing false starts for the visitors). Impact on This Game: This specific assignment heavily favors the Buccaneers (Road Team). If you believe the referee influences the game, Smith's presence suggests the Panthers will struggle to get "home cooking" calls and may face untimely procedural flags that stall drives. The Panthers have only had Shawn Smith officiate four home games since he became a head referee in 2018, and they are all losses. Date Opponent Result Score Nov 24, 2024 vs. Kansas City Chiefs Loss 27–30 Oct 9, 2022 vs. San Francisco 49ers Loss 15–37 Dec 12, 2021 vs. Atlanta Falcons Loss 21–29 Nov 25, 2018 vs. Seattle Seahawks Loss 27–30   Considering the how rare it is for Shawn Smith to officiate a Panthers game at all, this seems like an odd time to assign him to a Panthers game, unless the NFL wants to kill the Panthers season once and for all.  The Panthers' offensive line situation creates a "perfect storm" for referee Shawn Smith's specific tendency to call False Starts on the home team. The "Carousel" Factor (Communication Vulnerability) The most damning stat for the Panthers' offensive line in 2025 is their lack of continuity. The Stat: By Week 13, the Panthers had already fielded their 10th different offensive line combination. The Impact: False starts are often "communication penalties"—they happen when a guard doesn't hear the center's snap count or a tackle anticipates the wrong cadence. A unit that hasn't played together struggles with non-verbal communication. The Shawn Smith Multiplier: Shawn Smith’s crew calls False Starts at a high rate on home teams. He will likely look for flinches on the exterior of the line. A disjointed line that is constantly rotating players (due to the injuries of starters like Cade Mays and the illness issues with Robert Hunt earlier this season) is "fresh meat" for this specific referee bias. The Specific Culprits (2025 Penalties) Ikem Ekwonu (LT): Leads the team with 4 False Start penalties this season. He is the most frequent violator on the line. Taylor Moton (RT): Has been flagged for 3 False Starts. The Trap: Smith’s crew often focuses on the tackles (the players furthest from the ball) jumping early to get an edge on speed rushers. Since Ekwonu struggles with this discipline naturally, having a referee who hunts for it is a massive disadvantage. The "Managed Outcome" Synthesis The "Bucs Cover" Script: If the desired outcome is a Buccaneers win to solidify their playoff standing, the officials simply have to apply the letter of the law. Calling strict False Starts on a confused, banged-up Panthers O-line will consistently put them in "3rd and Long" situations, killing their drives and allowing the Bucs (-3.5) to cover easily. The "Close Game" Script: If the desired outcome is "Week 18 Drama" (keeping the division tied), look for the officials to ignore the Panthers' twitchy tackles. If Ekwonu jumps a split-second early and no flag is thrown, it effectively neutralizes the Bucs' pass rush, allowing the Panthers to keep the score close. Summary of the Edge Vulnerability: Extreme. The Panthers are playing backup interior linemen (like Jake Curhan or practice squad call-ups) next to jumpy tackles. Betting Implication: This strongly reinforces the Bucs -3 or -3.5 play. The combination of a "Road Team Referee" and a "Home Team O-Line in chaos" suggests the Panthers will beat themselves with procedural penalties. Based on the collision of the hard data (Referee bias + Offensive Line injuries) and the soft narratives ("Managed Outcomes"), here is the definitive recommendation. If you have to place a single Moneyline bet to win this game straight up: The Pick: Tampa Bay Buccaneers (-165) While the "Entertainment Script" hints at a Panthers upset to keep the division messy, the structural disadvantage the Panthers face in this specific matchup is too massive to ignore. Here is why the Buccaneers are the stong moneyline play: 1. The "Shawn Smith" Road-Field Advantage This is the decisive factor. In the NFL, Home Field Advantage usually accounts for about 1.5 to 2 points of value. The Reality: Referee Shawn Smith negates that advantage entirely. His crew calls penalties in a way that historically suppresses home crowd momentum (False Starts, holding). The Result: You are essentially getting the Buccaneers on a neutral field (or even a "pseudo-home" field) against a team with a worse roster. 2. The "Drive-Killer" Synergy To win as an underdog, the Panthers need to play a clean, mistake-free game to keep drives alive. The combination of Panthers' 10th O-Line combo + Jump-prone Tackles (Ekwonu) + A Referee who hunts False Starts is a recipe for disaster. The Scenario: Expect the Panthers to face multiple "1st and 15" or "3rd and 12" situations due to procedural flags. These drive-killers will force them to punt or settle for field goals, while the Bucs' offense (led by Mayfield) stays on schedule. 3. The "TV Product" Counter-Argument You asked about the "Managed Outcome." While a Panthers win creates "chaos," the NFL also values Star Power in the playoffs. Baker Mayfield and the Buccaneers are a proven national TV draw with recent playoff history. If the league has to choose between "Chaos" (Panthers) and "Ratings/Legitimacy" (Bucs), the "Script" likely leans toward ensuring the Buccaneers—the more marketable team—secure the division lead. They won't "fix" the game against the Panthers, but they won't intervene to save them from their own penalties. Final Verdict Betting on the Panthers requires you to hope for a miracle 4th-quarter collapse. Betting on the Buccaneers requires you to trust that a superior roster—aided by a favorable officiating crew—will control the game for the first 45 minutes. Take the Buccaneers Moneyline. The "Safe" money is on the Ref. The Prediction: Tampa Bay Buccaneers Win and Cover Projected Score: Buccaneers 27, Panthers 17 The Bet: Buccaneers -3 (or Moneyline -165) Confidence Level: High on the Winner; Moderate on the Spread (due to potential "garbage time" variance).
×
×
  • Create New...