Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers to ink Quintin Mikell?

UNCrules2187

By UNCrules2187,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

carolina-chuck Newbie

carolina-chuck

Posted
Posted

doesn't surprise me.

I know many disagree.

Cota was great. Terrel Iis forgettable.

Minter and McCree? Two strong safeties? I won't even consider such silliness.

Grant was widely inconsistent. I'll take Godfrey over him.

 

That Minter/McCree dua was pretty good. I donno about Grant though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
KillerKat Grand Master

KillerKat

Posted
Posted

No tandum can beat the 2003 safety positions of Minter and Grant. It's sad that that is debatable. Just proves we haven't had a lot of star power at the position since our conception. Godfrey has always been a terrible safety. Sure he can tackle pretty good, but the primary job of a safety is to cover and he is very poor at coverage. The conerbacks aren't at fault for his play, he is just terrible at it. For me, I'm hoping for a Mikell/Mitchell tandem this upcoming season. I don't know if Mitchell would be worlds better than Godfrey, but I know Godfrey is bad. However, I know that won't happen since the coaches seem to like Godfrey's "fire" so to speak.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
pantherclaw Grand Master

pantherclaw

Posted
Posted

That Minter/McCree dua was pretty good. I donno about Grant though.

minter and mccree are both the definition of strong safeties.

We started them both out of necessity.

It worked well enough.

Godfrey is more of a free safety. One of the best the panthers have had, despite the constant hate he gets.

Like I said, I'll take two talented starting safeties that fit their responsibilities better than two strojg safeties, with one of them playing the free safety position.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
carolina-chuck Newbie

carolina-chuck

Posted
Posted

minter and mccree are both the definition of strong safeties.

We started them both out of necessity.

It worked well enough.

Godfrey is more of a free safety. One of the best the panthers have had, despite the constant hate he gets.

Like I said, I'll take two talented starting safeties that fit their responsibilities better than two strojg safeties, with one of them playing the free safety position.

Could say the same thing about Godfrey and Mikell. Godfrey is also a SS/FS and many on here would believe that he's a better SS than FS.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Razeyfingers Newbie

Razeyfingers

Posted
Posted

No tandum can beat the 2003 safety positions of Minter and Grant. It's sad that that is debatable. Just proves we haven't had a lot of star power at the position since our conception. Godfrey has always been a terrible safety. Sure he can tackle pretty good, but the primary job of a safety is to cover and he is very poor at coverage. The conerbacks aren't at fault for his play, he is just terrible at it. For me, I'm hoping for a Mikell/Mitchell tandem this upcoming season. I don't know if Mitchell would be worlds better than Godfrey, but I know Godfrey is bad. However, I know that won't happen since the coaches seem to like Godfrey's "fire" so to speak.

 

I think the primary strength you look for in a safety these days is how well he can cover but thats not his primary job man, cmon.

 

Its incredibly difficult to evaluate safeties because of their actual primary job, compensate for weak areas of the D. Godfrey makes plays and gives up plays. Idk, he looks good to me when I watch him play.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...