Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Luke Kuechly bust?


Growl

Recommended Posts

* Rivera has a great defensive mind

* Clark Kent, on 23 August 2013 - 12:12 AM, said:

Did their Rookie DT's play good? I am a big fan of their draft, but i wasn't expecting Star and Short to dominate right off the bat. Especially against the Ravens O line. I haven't got to see the game. I was out here directing traffic for Madison Central v Brandon football game. Your from the Sip so you know who that is. Brandon ranked #1 in the state right now.

Shoot yeah. Man, those boys were dominating. It was scary. Made me very glad they took Cam instead of Darius.

* Yeah, to me they have the best DE combo in the NFC. Next year or maybe two years from now they could have the best D line in the NFC. Freaking legit they got Star and then Short. They compliment each other so well.

* Their defensive line was the key to his success. They disrupted Flacco's rhythm. In my humble opinion, Spoon could have put up those stats without too much trouble if he was a Panther( a sight I never want to see).

* Dline is the reason for Kuechly to do what he did against the Ravens. Star and Short were destroying the middle of their Oline. Each with 1 sack and 3 TFL. Even when double teamed, Star still held them up.

Basically the DTs allowed Kuechly to run free. Every great MLB out there or has ever been out there, has had help from their Dline in freeing them up. Kuechly was a tackling machine with an eye for the ball last season with zero support in the middle of the line, if the DTs hold up, there could be a defensive player of the year award somewhere in Kuechly's future, down the road.

* The Panties front seven is sick. They punked us last year before the additions on the DLine. We better bring our lunch pail when we play em.

* AJ Klein may become really good... he and Kuechly = ouch

*

Link to comment
Share on other sites

* Kuechly put almost every LB in the NFL to shame save Patrick Willis. Not sure why you're singling out the Falcons

* He is a beast. I'd take him over all our LBs over Spoon (yes, I know he's a MLB).

* Kuechly is a beast. I'm still surprised (and annoyed) that he fell to the Panthers. I know LBs aren't as highly valued as they should be but he was, and is, a much better player than #9 overall

* I liked Kuechly because he showed & proved last season he was more than capable. the young DTs yall drafted is gonna pay off big, but the thing that scared me down the line was when yall got AJ Klein. if he stays healthy and plays to his ability it'll be like having Kuechly a & b.

*

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Teams do some super stupid stuff with mid-fairly good QBs. I think they are just absolutely terrified they will be stuck with a QB that is not the quality of the QB they have now, even if its someone like Daniel Jones. Lots of trash QBs go in the first round. I encourage you to take a look at the sad, sad list of first round QBs in the last 15 years.  
    • No, it will be a raw 6'7" 17-year-old European who just played basketball for the first time in March and who the idiot GM "had first on our board." He'll play the whole G-League season, get in 42 games for the Hornets and average 1.1 ppg on 35% shooting. Been there, seen that.
    • We missed on Burns at his peak value. That’s the problem with trading for picks 2-3 years away (which people were convinced the Rams would suck by now and these would be higher picks btw). Each year away the pick is the further in value it drops. Fitt was clearly hired based on turning us around quickly. It’s one of the many reasons tanking isn’t really a thing as our player JJ is telling you in this original article. It would take the whole organization from the owners down admitting they aren’t winning soon with Burns and picks 2-3 years away having more value because that’s when we are still rebuilding. It would only make sense if Fitt had a longer leash and would more than likely be the ones making these picks anyway which you wouldn’t want. The question is would you rather have those Rams picks with the strong possibility of Fitt still being here or would you rather Fitt try to “win now” like he did and expedite his firing? Altering the timeline would affect more than just the Rams picks. 
×
×
  • Create New...