Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Game 1 NFCS Betting Lines

Mother Grabber

By Mother Grabber,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

Mother Grabber Grand Master

Mother Grabber

Posted
Posted

The current Vegas betting lines are:

 

ATL @ NOR -3  54

SEA -3 @ CAR  45

TAM -3 @ JETS  40

 

Current Superbowl odds:

ATL 17-1

NOR 20-1

CAR 45-1  SEA 12-1

TAM 55-1  NYJ 85-1

 

The Taints are basically just given their home team advantage, so that's a pickem game.  Note the O/U is 54, with two of the strongest Offenses AND weakest Defenses in the league this year.  I'm hoping for them to top 1000 total yds, and expect them to score over 30pts each in a high flying shoot out.  Should be entertaining to watch, at least for people who can stand seeing those two teams on the field at the same time, and it seems like they are trying to induce betting with that O/U.  Good news...one of them starts 0-1.  Bad news...one of them starts 1-0.

 

The other two games have the away team favored by 3, which is significant, especially since Seattle is traveling across the country and typically plays at a lower level on the East coast.  I'm also a little surprised that we have an over/under of 45, in a game that features two of the stronger defenses in the game.  We have Superbowl odds almost 4x that of Seattle, yet are only 6pt dogs (3+3 for home field).

 

The Tampa - Jets game offers strictly comedic value, and should be interesting to keep an eye on during commercials.  The OU here at 40 is also interesting.  Makes me feel that Vegas doesn't have much faith in Tampa, which is backed up by their lowest NFCS Superbowl odds at 55-1.

 

For those who are paying attention, Eagles are also listed as 85-1 Superbowl odds.  They are a question mark...but on par with the Jets?  Ouch.

 

Source: http://www.vegas.com/gaming/sportsline/football/

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Khyber53
      2026 NFL Combine Thread: 2.26.26 - 3.1.26

      By Khyber53 · Posted

      I think you've nailed what we need right here.  Rodriguez and Thieneman would be my choices, Thieneman in the first and Rodriguez in the second. Let everyone else eat up their picks on the crop of WRs and linemen. Then make a push in free agency for the top center.
    • MHS831
      2026 NFL Combine Thread: 2.26.26 - 3.1.26

      By MHS831 · Posted

      Vernon Gholston vibes?  had 14 sacks at Ohio State in 2007; 45 games in the NFL:  0 sacks.  
    • MHS831
      2026 NFL Combine Thread: 2.26.26 - 3.1.26

      By MHS831 · Posted

      I want a high impact player, but a true FS who could qb the secondary might be more effective than we realize.  I don't think Moehrig is that guy (I think he is overpaid, however).  I want a flashy, high impact player, but we could use defensive qbs at ILB  and FS.  By upgrading skill AND adding vision and leadership, could we get better than if we added an edge or OT? I am not sure that I believe this myself, but I try to look at things from all perspectives.  Here is some devil's advocacy stuff: 1. EDGE-We are freaking out about the pressure we put on the qb from the edge position.  However, Jones II and Wonnum missed a total of 22 games. Scourton was a rookie and Princely was a third rounder.  Wharton sucked (not sure if he was used properly--a hybrid who can rush from the 5 tech or 3, etc), and this put more pressure on Scourton and the other edge players.  This year, we get Jones II, Scourton should continue to evolve with Princely.  Perhaps another rookie is not what we need.  Maybe a veteran situational pass rusher.  2. OFFENSIVE TACKLE:  Of course, we need an OT, but the draft is loaded with OTs that can pass block but struggle in run blocking--so a rookie at LT might not be the answer for a team that wants to run first.  What to do?  I am not sure.  I see Nijman returning after testing the market, but who knows? 3.  INSIDE LB:  A huge need, regardless of how you spin it.  However, I see a few free agents who would be solid here, and I see the second round having a few ILBs with starting potential.  I do not see an ILB worth the first round pick unless a freak falls to us. 4.  With veteran defensive backs, a young, intelligent FS could fit in nicely. Intelligence is key--like the way Luke made the front 7 better. "A good, intelligent free safety (FS) acts as the "quarterback of the defense" transforming a unit from good to great by acting as the last line of defense, communicating pre-snap adjustments, and anticipating plays before they happen. By reading the quarterback's eyes and diagnosing offensive schemes, an intelligent FS acts as a "centerfielder" who can neutralize deep threats and mitigate errors made by cornerbacks or linebackers."  
×
×
  • Create New...