Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

top 5 Defense, bottom 10 Offense

panthernation23

By panthernation23,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

panthernation23 Newbie

panthernation23

Posted
  • Author
Posted

PN23 has been exposed as an idiot, now we get to sit back and watch him desperately grasp at straws while trying to keep his head above water.

 

 

yes many points have been valid in explaining how were gonna be a top 10 offense, here are the best points so far

 

 

#1 nuh uhhh your an idiot

 

#2 nuh uhhh your stupid

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • 2 weeks later...
JawnyBlaze Grand Master

JawnyBlaze

Posted
Posted

looks like you were miles off.  The O-line was decent this game, Deangelo ran the ball like Deangelo of '09 (won't go so far as to say '08 beasting D-Will, but he was running good against a very good run defense), Safeties look acceptable now with Mikell back there, Olsen will be fine, backup WRs will be fine against any secondary that's not as ridiculously good as this one.  Yup, you were pretty much as far off as you can get.  Having a poor offensive showing against one of the better defenses in the league, even if they're missing two DEs and a CB, isn't reason to overreact.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
panthernation23 Newbie

panthernation23

Posted
  • Author
Posted

looks like you were miles off.  The O-line was decent this game, Deangelo ran the ball like Deangelo of '09 (won't go so far as to say '08 beasting D-Will, but he was running good against a very good run defense), Safeties look acceptable now with Mikell back there, Olsen will be fine, backup WRs will be fine against any secondary that's not as ridiculously good as this one.  Yup, you were pretty much as far off as you can get.  Having a poor offensive showing against one of the better defenses in the league, even if they're missing two DEs and a CB, isn't reason to overreact.

 

 

D-Will fumbled twice and had a 70 yard game

 

 

the safety gave up the only td in the game on terrible coverage

 

 

what game were you watching

Link to comment
Share on other sites
rodeo Grand Master

rodeo

Posted
Posted

D-Will fumbled twice and had a 70 yard game

 

 

the safety gave up the only td in the game on terrible coverage

 

 

what game were you watching

 

Deangelo had 86 yards at 5.1 yards per carry.

 

Godfrey did not give up a TD, Thomas did. It was not Godfrey's man. Thomas got beat.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
panthernation23 Newbie

panthernation23

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Deangelo had 86 yards at 5.1 yards per carry.

 

Godfrey did not give up a TD, Thomas did. It was not Godfrey's man. Thomas got beat.

 

ohh sorry, 2 fumbles and 86 yards is much better

 

godfrey blew his coverage, and also wilson carved up the secondary despite being pressured almost every play. Our safties played a terrible game, 0 ball hawk skills

Link to comment
Share on other sites
JawnyBlaze Grand Master

JawnyBlaze

Posted
Posted

you might need to get your eyes checked, or at least understand whats considered a good or bad game for a player

 

If you actually watched the game instead of spouting off the stat line you'd see Deangelo ran well.  Yea, he lost a fumble at an inopportune time, but he is not "done".  5.1 ypc against the Seattle defense would be considered outstanding by most.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
panthernation23 Newbie

panthernation23

Posted
  • Author
Posted

If you actually watched the game instead of spouting off the stat line you'd see Deangelo ran well.  Yea, he lost a fumble at an inopportune time, but he is not "done".  5.1 ypc against the Seattle defense would be considered outstanding by most.

 

1st off - I said D-Will looks "About done"

 

2 fumbles 80 yards and 0 td's isnt outstanding, and when a D is exploiting your ability to hold onto the ball when you are a 30 year old RB, you are looking ABOUT DONE.

 

im sure he has 1 or 2 years left at most, but don't expect some magical season from D-Will, that time has passed

 

 

5.1 yards a carry good job, but hold onto the ball and dont lose the game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Jon Snow
      2026 Mock Drafts

      By Jon Snow · Posted

      I would say that he's pulling things out of his ass to get people to visit his site.
    • strato
      OFFICIAL 2026 Undrafted Free Agent Thread

      By strato · Posted

      Yep. I was hoping for and calling for a day three guy. But I didn’t research the position to say if we should or should‘t have jumped at a particular guy at a particular spot.    And everything I read said it was a poor draft for RBs depth wise. I guess when Seattle takes a backup RB in the 1st, that kind of backs that up.    I definitely think we should keep 4 running backs and if King can play well enough then keep him too.    I believe I heard Canales say we are a running team (talking about drafting a WR he will be needing to block as well as catch). Well if we are gonna be a running team by identity we don’t need to stock the WR room to overflowing. If one room has to sacrifice, it should not be the RB room given our circumstances. 
    • outlaw4
      Dan had a great draft

      By outlaw4 · Posted

      If there's a pattern I'm definitely picking up from Dan and company is a philosophy of making trades where we try not to sacrifice the number of draft picks we have by day's end. In other words, we're not giving up three picks for one, or giving up a future pick to make a pick today. And even if we give up something at the start, we make trades later to make up for that initial loss. Here's how it stacked up for 2026: How we started: 19, 51, 83, 119, 158, 159, 200 How we ended: 19, 49, 83, 129, 144, 151, 227 (no future picks sacrificed) Ultimately, we moved up two spots in the second to ensure we got someone we coveted, gave up a few spots for our fourth round pick, but then had better picks in the 5th (and got really good value out of them), and had a worse 7th rounder which isn't that big of a loss anyways.  At this point, we can question who they draft, but they're pretty good maneuvering across the draft board.
×
×
  • Create New...