Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Gucci Manes Thoughts


Gucci Mane

Recommended Posts

Ok, after plenty of beer and constant hindsight, ive decided to release the inner notepad onto the Huddle..

 

 

Here we go:

 

- First and foremost, you can't even talk about the game without mentioning how awesome our defense looked. Its nice to be able to still feel confident about the game when the offense struggled on the previous series. Last year it was like we had to score every drive to stay in it.

 

-The DLine actually got great pressure on Wilson which he wasnt typically used to. Much better than we thought with the preseason.

 

-Offense struggled to find a rhythm but i really dont think you can put all the blame on Shula. Sure we didnt heave the ball down field and let cam sling for 400 yards but the only thing that matters is we were in a position to win. I think the offense was simple, watered down, boring, but it minimized potential mistakes. Late in the game when we had to drive to take the lead, we continued what the game had dictated in the previous 3 quarters and it was working.

 

- DeAngelo let us down. Say what you want, but the dude doesnt put the ball on the ground in those situations 9/10 times. There is no question in my mind that we would have won the game if he held on to it.

 

- Olsen/Smitty did pretty well, but we need to spread the ball around. Olsen dropped a couple key passes but they were very tricky catches to make. We need to throw deep more, especially with Ginn. If we complete a few passes to Ginn or Lafell down field, defenses will have to stop rolling coverage over to smitty and we will be able to open up the rest of the offense.

 

- Cam needs to step into his throws more. He also needs to speed up his internal clock, at times he got caught staring down field in the pocket too long, but as soon as he starts to scramble he no longer looks down field. He needs to find his balance.

 

 

This is my reaction while the huddle overreacts to our first game:

 

02CCizw.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ps does every person's thoughts deserve a thread? no one cares about this rambling bullshit.

No one cares a out your thoughts on how pointless this bullshit is. Personally, I couldn't disagree with Gucci Maynes thoughts more. We came out flat( preseason offense wasn't vanilla, that was just our offense) . We couldve taken chances to score in this game as good as our D is. We are now a conservative team with a great defense. Before, we were a high powered offense with an iffy defense but why do we have to have a trade off? We don't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

De Lo should blame himself, they were on a game winning drive and he's carry the ball like a loaf of bread. And yes the coach sucks, should have been fired last year. Their the only team in the NFL who can dominate a game like that and still find away to lose it. Im a Panther for life but IM SICK AND TIRED OF THE SAME OLD SONG AND DANCE.. freaking stop giving games away .. PERIOD ..

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

De Lo should blame himself, they were on a game winning drive and he's carry the ball like a loaf of bread. And yes the coach sucks, should have been fired last year. Their the only team in the NFL who can dominate a game like that and still find away to lose it. Im a Panther for life but IM SICK AND TIRED OF THE SAME OLD SONG AND DANCE.. freaking stop giving games away .. PERIOD ..

 

be sure and update your myspace blog with this

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Congratulations do they know who the father is?
    • In my opinion Fitterer was probably right about not paying McCaffrey. Now not wanting to "pay RBs" in my opinion isn't something you want to set in stone, to me it all comes down to the individual.
    • Maybe I'm just not understanding, but everywhere that I have read says that signing bonuses go against the cap prorated by as much as five years. The following example uses Andrew Luck's rookie contract as an example. "Take Andrew Luck, the first overall pick in the 2012 NFL draft. Luck signed a four-year contract with the Colts worth $22.1 million and included a $14.5 million signing bonus. Rather than a $14.5 million cap hit in 2012, the Colts spread out his signing bonus over the life of his contract. The hit against the cap would be $3.625 million per year over four years instead of a direct cap hit of $14.5 million directly in 2012. This gave the Colts more leverage and cap flexibility in signing other players." https://www.the33rdteam.com/nfl-signing-bonuses-explained/ I don't know why some of you think that signing bonuses aren't counted against the cap over the length of the contract, but whatever.   "The bonus with a signing is usually the most garish aspect of a rookie contract. Bonus is the immediate cash players receive when they ink a deal. It factors into the cap, but only for the whole contract duration, in terms of salary cap calculations. In the case of Bryce Young’s $24.6 million signing bonus, that’s prorated to approximately $6.15 million per season over a four-year deal. This format allows teams to handle the cap and provides rookies with some short-term fiscal stability, which is important given the high injury risk in this league." https://collegefootballnetwork.com/how-rookie-contracts-work-in-the-nfl/ I understand how signing bonuses can be a useful tool in order to manage the cap, and as one of the article suggests, signing bonuses may become important if you have a tight cap, but the bill is always going to come due. I'm not necessarily referring to you Tuka, but it seems to me that others simply don't want to understand that fact which is why they're reacting to what I'm saying negatively. How odd. In any event, I have a better general understanding of why signing bonuses are used now, and it's generally to fit salaries under the cap. Surely players, whether they be rookies or not, love a signing bonus because they get a good portion of their money up front. This in turn gives them more security and probably amounts to tax benefits as well. I also understand why teams would not want to use signing bonuses, particularly for players or draftees who have a higher probability of being gone before a contract even ends.
×
×
  • Create New...