Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Ranking the Young QB's According to ESPN


Wyank

Recommended Posts

Purely based on subjective opinionated garbage. You know, the usual from espn...

How can you tell it's biased?

Explain to me the durability rankings alone. First off, how many of these guys have missed more than a snap or two due to injury? IIRC, only RG3. So then what is the criteria they are measured against for these infallible "rankings"? I think the first should be physical size/build. So explain to me how any of the other guys would rank above Cam? And if they really cared about their jobs, they would derive this ranking off of actual game tape - how the players play and the hits they have taken. I'm willing to bet without looking, that Cam has taken more hits than any of the other guys and IIRC, has only missed a snap or two after getting his ankle rolled up on last year. Cam has likely taken harder shots and done more damage to the hitter than any other of these guys due to his physical size and skill alone.

Complete and utter bullshit.

And Bill Polian can go fug himself. I'll take his opinion on QBs seriously when he gives us our first round pick back ththat he wasted on an alcoholic racist whose heart wasn't into playing football. Seriously, fug him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Johnny Rockets beat me to it, but came here to make the point about Andy Dalton?  Before last year's crop of QB's, the media would compare Newton and the ginger and stats be damned, Dalton was better because Cincy won.

 

Now, he's out of the equation already?  Wouldn't it be more fun to compare Dalton to Luck, or maybe Wilson?  Nope, if there is an opportunity to show that Cam is dead fugging last in any category, you can believe he will show up on that list.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All of these QBs are still developing. Time will tell all. Beyond that, I really don't think there's anything to be mad about except for Polian's bullshit. However, I think they pretty much tainted the credibility of the entire piece by ranking Cam next to last in durability. But to me that's more amusing than anything else.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Typical Espn BS. One problem is that if you say a lie enough it becomes the truth. So in many people's eyes they don't need to do their own research on Cam Newton. The mainstream media has done it for them. They are lazy and refuse to look at facts. What records have any of these others had? Cam was put on a horrible team with very little talent. The rest of these qb's would have struggled worse than Cam on this team. If Cam was on the niners or skins or Colts he would be looked at entirely different. Luck "lucked" into a perennial contender. They tanked to draft him. I don't believe that they were as bad as their record. I personally hate the majority of the National media. They are a disgrace! Give me Cam 7 days a week!!!

Sent from my SPH-D710 using CarolinaHuddle mobile app

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Espn is absolutely a joke. I mean I just watched a few seconds of nfl live and mark Schleswig just said that the Seahawks secondary is amazing and that Sherman won that game for the Seahawks against us by causing the fumble on deangelo. All I could do is laugh. Clearly these guys don't even watch games.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...