Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Now That We Have Won, What Do The Defensive Replacements' Performance Today Say About Our Coaching Staff?


TylerDurden

Recommended Posts

Look, if we string together some wins and put ourselves in playoff contention, ultimately it won't matter. But, I find it troubling that this rag-tag group of replacements were as dominant as they were today, and yet, it took injuries to completely wipe out our original starters and Rivera knowing he was a game away from being fired to make the changes.

Remember when I suggested that Rivera played favorites to our detriment and thst our organization has long had an issue with just handing out jobs rather than making players comoete and earn them? Many laughed it off.

I know that no one could've predicted THIS, but I think it shows what a problem we have had in personnel decisions under Rivera.

But again, I don't care about the past if he makes it right the rest of this season and learns from his mistakes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A laughable notion. No offense will move the ball with the front four breathing down their neck the way ours did today. Hardy, Johnson, and Star wrecked any kind of offensive game plan they could have put together. Did the secondary have to make a big play at any point in this game? Not to my recollection.

 

We feasted on a weak offensive line performance. We rattled Manning in the first half and everything carried from there. Our offense woke up and we won the game.

 

We could have had four Sherrod Martin's in our secondary and nothing would have changed here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Our defense didn't look like that in the first two weeks, in huge part due to the personnel.

The defense looked very good against Seattle.

 

They played their worst game in many weeks against Buffalo, but without the injuries, they would have pulled that game out.

 

The Giants today finished with 90 yards passing and 60 yards rushing.

 

This was the result of brilliant play by one of the very best front 7's in the league coupled with the one dimensional nature of the Giant offense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Our defense didn't look like that in the first two weeks, in huge part due to the personnel.

 

You literally cannot feel that to be true. I would question your sanity if you did. We had a two man defense with Hardy and Johnson. Pressure on the QB absolves all sins in this league. We collapsed the Giants line on every snap, rush or pass, and that was the difference.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A laughable notion. No offense will move the ball with the front four breathing down their neck the way ours did today. Hardy, Johnson, and Star wrecked any kind of offensive game plan they could have put together. Did the secondary have to make a big play at any point in this game? Not to my recollection.

 

 

Last year against the Bears begs to differ.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A laughable notion. No offense will move the ball with the front four breathing down their neck the way ours did today. Hardy, Johnson, and Star wrecked any kind of offensive game plan they could have put together. Did the secondary have to make a big play at any point in this game? Not to my recollection.

We feasted on a weak offensive line performance. We rattled Manning in the first half and everything carried from there. Our offense woke up and we won the game.

We could have had four Sherrod Martin's in our secondary and nothing would have changed here.

Yes because Godfrey, Beason, and Norman were completely flawless, unquestionable options at their positions.

The Giants put up huge numbers the first two games. Yes our DL was lights out, but they can't play that way if the back end isn't holding up. They are completely dependent on each other and our secondary got ate up for big yards the first two weeks. Changes shouldve been made earlier because our DL got pressure in the first two weeks and passes were still being completed to a far less talented receiving group by far less accomplished QBs compared to what the Giants have.

I think you are grossly underestimating the secondary's performance today.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Basically agree.  He is the one of that bunch that offers upgraded pass catching along with he is supposed to be kind of special.   Then you have the OL and the ideas that if they perform you can have JAG backs and still do well. So okay we could be fine.  But Brooks is important and to me that receiving element sets him apart.  So there sure is something riding on him.     What strikes me as incongruent is people over in Atlanta or those that follow them look at Penix with a third surgery and act like it is no big deal.      And we are on pins and needles over Brooks.  Either they should worry a lot more or we should worry a lot less.  
    • I usually go a game or two optimist over the consensus here but this is too early for me to say. I need to see some players on the field.  I am not feeling real optimistic though.  
    • Okay as a ‘take CJ’ fan I actually don’t obsess over CJ and Houston, contrary to the narrative.  But I thought I picked up some noise that his OL left a lot to be desired.    Not a single Beyce supporter would judge him harshly if he had a crappy OL. We all know that.    So be fair about it.  A QB needs to be protected.  Especially a guy that gets to his spot and wants to finish the play from there. Which CJ is.  
×
×
  • Create New...