Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Question about this Coaching staff.

koolkatluke

By koolkatluke,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

koolkatluke Newbie

koolkatluke

Posted
Posted

What does a player have to do to earn a spot or keep a spot with this Coaching Staff??

 

 

How this staff awards playing time is still a mystery for me.

 

What has Josh Thomas and Capt. done to keep starting jobs over White, Florance, and Norman (I know Norman is back in the Dog House for the Buffalo game)??

 

White has a great game and Thomas is just giving the starting spot coming back.

 

What has Armanti done to let alone be a head of Hixon but even still be on this team??

 

Why did it take so long for them to see Blackburn was more healthy then Beason and should have been starting??

 

 

And The whole Naka thing last year.

 

How do players earn playing time with this coaching staff??

Link to comment
Share on other sites
MtnJax Rising Star

MtnJax

Posted
Posted

Tough to answer since we are not privileged enough to see them practice or how well they pick up the playbook, and study film

 

This. and I imagine the position coaches would have input on this as well since they are the ones working with them directly

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TheRumGone Grand Master

TheRumGone

Posted
Posted

We saw White make plays in the Giant game. What have we seen from Thomas other then him giving up a 47 yard TD to a back-up WR??

 

he's excellent in run defense. the 47 yard td was a play where carrol brought in fresh legs and ran the same play back to back. Godfrey should have recognized.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
koolkatluke Newbie

koolkatluke

Posted
  • Author
Posted

he's excellent in run defense. the 47 yard td was a play where carrol brought in fresh legs and ran the same play back to back. Godfrey should have recognized.

 

I like Josh to but be real he was burnt the play (WR just drop the ball) before and he never adjusted.

 

He should have know they were going after him again.

 

I wouldn't mind Thomas and White being the starting Duo. But White earn playing time in my opinion. He is also good against the run and he made plays in the Giant game.

 

The INt was good but the causing the fumble after giving up the REC. was a seriously good play from a rookie CB.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TheRumGone Grand Master

TheRumGone

Posted
Posted

I like Josh to but be real he was burnt the play (WR just drop the ball) before and he never adjusted.

 

He should have know they were going after him again.

 

I wouldn't mind Thomas and White being the starting Duo. But White earn playing time in my opinion. He is also good against the run and he made plays in the Giant game.

 

The INt was good but the causing the fumble after giving up the REC. was a seriously good play from a rookie CB.

 

 

i think it was on both of them honestly. Godfrey should have been helping out and Thomasgave it a good shot if i remember correctly he was right there, just a good throw.

 

I agree about Melvin though, he's earned it big time. He played big time.

 

But we also had a crazy pass rush which is why it went from 70% to 50%

Link to comment
Share on other sites
koolkatluke Newbie

koolkatluke

Posted
  • Author
Posted

i think it was on both of them honestly. Godfrey should have been helping out and Thomasgave it a good shot if i remember correctly he was right there, just a good throw.

 

I agree about Melvin though, he's earned it big time. He played big time.

 

But we also had a crazy pass rush which is why it went from 70% to 50%

 

Pass Rush was good in the Seattle game as well. Wilson still comp. a lot of passes.

 

In the  Buffalo game they can use that excuse.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • csx
      Quick FYI

      By csx · Posted

      Get well
    • PanthersGTI
      Kyle trask released by bucs

      By PanthersGTI · Posted

      He's not wrong though. You talk like a politician on here. Leaving yourself just enough wiggle room to say you never fully counted Bryce out if you need to....But we can all see it. Just say you think he is a bust outright and you will have to type a lot less. Obfuscating your opinion behind QB3 competitions etc....
    • d-dave
      Experience with Electric Vehicles?

      By d-dave · Posted

      Most EVs are in the 90+ e-MPG meaning some measurement house somewhere compares the EV to a similar ICE model and works out how much is costs to charge (on average) versus fill up as a point of comparison. Talking long term, in the hundreds of thousands of miles?  No clue.  Some early signs are that EV batteries maintain 80% charge over 400k miles.  So there's that.   The challenge and charm of an ICE vehicle is being able to park it under a tree, get your jack stands out and tinker with your engine.  There's just not that same level of complexity in an EV.  I saw someone estimate there are 200 or so moving parts in an EV, and 2000 in an ICE vehicle.  I'm not a part counter so I can't really speak to that. I think that the EV is more the future than any type of combustion engine.  Those will still be around in specific purposes, but for most people - an EV will be the superior option in terms of efficiency.  I say that as someone who loves stupid horsepower numbers out of turbo 4 bangers and inline 6s...  I am one of those tinkers when I can be. A bigger issue for EVs is going to be the ownership versus lease.  Right now, there are INSANE leases on EVs, which is great, but what do you have at the end of that lease?  Nada, maybe some equity if you're lucky.  Where as I'm almost done paying for my car, and plan to keep it until the wheels fall off (or my son wrecks it when he starts to drive).  Will EV makers do the smartphone thing and build in planned obsolesce?  Stop updating software?  I love the tech in EVs, and I think getting more cars and trucks off the road is a good thing.  But I am still just a little concerned.  Capitalism has gotten far too extractive.  
×
×
  • Create New...