Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Browns asking for 2nd round pick for Gordon


mbarbour21

Recommended Posts

Not sure why giving a second wouldn't be good value. Cleveland gave up a second too, for a guy that was dubbed a "Stephen Hill clone" (also a second rounder btw). He is not a Stephen Hill clone (2nd round WR). He has outplayed this value. Gordon=stud.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Isn't a Jon Beason situation. Gordon could come in and immediately be in our top 3 with Ginn, Lafell, and Smith.

My question for you all is who would we miss more; Ginn or Lafell?

 

We are already loaded with WR3 almost our WR are 3th WRs.

 

AE is N°3 because he played well during the camp, Ginn is N°3 because Smitty is first and Lafell is 2, Lafell is N°3 because he is not better than both Smitty and Ginn.

 

Today, imho, Ginn is N°1, Smitty N° 2  and everyone else is a N°3

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We are already loaded with WR3 almost our WR are 3th WRs.

AE is N°3 because he played well during the camp, Ginn is N°3 because Smitty is first and Lafell is 2, Lafell is N°3 because he is not better than both Smitty and Ginn.

Today, imho, Ginn is N°1, Smitty N° 2 and everyone else is a N°3

We know where they are on the depth chart but in terms of who the men are. I definitely believe it's Ginn, Smith, and and everyone else can be traded for Josh Gordon and one other tight end

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • i think the difference is that we win when we minimize Bryce as part of the offense ala Trent dilfer. look at the games we win and he us always under 200 yards passing. 
    • Which is also why we talk about there being a lower ceiling for Bryce I think Bryce sees the game decently well already given the mess this offence has been for the better part of his career. His big WTF plays are typically him just dropping the damn ball Which leaves me wondering sometimes what does peak Bryce look like. Guys like Sam you’d watch in NY/Carolina and he’d have so many boneheaded plays that you were left thinking if he could just clean these up you’d have a solid QB. And now we’re finally seeing Sam in a good offence and he’s able to play with timing and within structure and those boneheaded plays are cut down to 2-3 times a game Bryce doesn’t have a ton of boneheaded plays (minus flat out dropping the ball) so I dunno. I think Bryce can be a solid QB. Put Bryce in Seattle or Tampa and they’re still winning a lot of games  Coaching and overall team matters so much. The only dude that I think could probably do the most with the least in this league would be Lamar 
    • They both struggle with that but Lawrence is a significantly better athlete and an INSANELY more physically gifted passer. He has very limited reasons to be struggling the way he has. I will say, when he came into the league I specifically remember an interview that he basically intimated that he would be okay if his life didn't involve football and I have always questioned if he was passionate enough to be elite from that moment onward.
×
×
  • Create New...