Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

DVOA (Statistical Analysis)


SgtJoo

Recommended Posts

wgVVwcL.png

 

http://www.footballoutsiders.com/dvoa-ratings/2013/week-7-dvoa-ratings

 

Kansas City's ranking is one of the few places where the current DVOA ratings deviate significantly from win-loss records. Another team that stands out is Carolina, which has climbed to sixth overall at 3-3. However, with the exception of the Panthers, every team with a winning record is better than every team at .500 or worse except for two teams right in the middle of the ratings: Atlanta 15th at 2-4 and the Jets 16th at 4-3.

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Figures lie and liars figure.  Lies, damn lies and statistics.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

In this case, I believe you're actually presenting a significant statistical relationship.  P is high, keep the guy, P is low, let it go.

 

Pie for anyone who knows of which I speak.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I notice a common theme between SEA, DEN, KC, and IND.  Good fuging STs.  What the hell is the deal with our STs?  It seems like every time I watch another team's games they have at least one huge return a game.  Here we have Ginn, one of the best in the business, and I think at best he's returned it maybe a little over 20 yards once or twice.

 

It seems like every time he goes to return he's got people immediately in his face.  If those guys could step it up some that'd be a huge boost for the team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • They still make all the major personale decisions during the off-season. Especially during the draft and early free agency. 
    • Fine.  It's his 3rd season which makes his progress and mental fortitude even more impressive after overcoming one of the worst situations to be in starting your NFL career. If the hard takes on Bryce were not filled with so much hyperbole, assumptions and outright lies it wouldn't annoy me so much. Bryce can't throw downfield. He threw it fine downfield to Legette on that deep shot he dropped last year. He threw it fine downfield to T-Mac sunday who proceeded to drop the pass. Bryce is too small. Boy takes a beating before we invested in the offensive line and so far he'd held up physically with no issues. Bryce is too short. The majority of his throws are over the middle which would be the most difficult routes for a shorter QB to see.  He doesn't get balls batted down more than any taller QB's. Bryce is too slow. Last year he ran for 6 TD's and 249 yards.  That ability is a real weapon. Most of the takes around here are of the "Omergaud, he suks" variety with little actual insight.  If a guy is able to play and win multiple NFL games he has to have some talent and ability and if a person continues to say there is no redeeming qualities and you can't tell me what he is good at as well as what he's bad at, then you're not being honest, realistic or genuine.  You're being a fool.
    • CSW might be the best pick of the group, and I see his ceiling as solid.  I’d say Munnerlyn is a good comp, but Munnerlyn actually was very good in his role. The more I see of Sanders, the more he feels like the new Ian Thomas.  But can’t make a definitive assessment on that until he plays with a good QB.
×
×
  • Create New...