Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

I did my own lil research


beastson

Recommended Posts

Under Rivera/Cam era, the Panthers are 13-1 when scoring 30pts & over with that 1 loss to Detroit in 2011

 

 

2012 & 2013 ONLY

 

24pts & UP, the Panthers are 11-1 in 2012 & 2013. That 1 Loss IN ATL last season

 

In games scored 21pts BEFORE the 4th quarter in 2012, they're 6-1 ^ Look one sentence up. In 2013, they're 4-0 = 10-1.

 

21pts period or LESS than 21pts, 2012 & 2013 they're a combined 1-9

 

You ask 24 and 21. what about 22 and 23. Well the Panthers in 2012 and 2013 are 0-2 scoring 22 in Chicago in 2012 and 23 to Buffalo in 2013

 

When you combine all that and find a median. The Panthers are 11-1 24pts and above, 1-11 24pts and below in 2012 & 2013. Creepy it's the exact opposite isn't it

 

It shows to me in defensive battled games, it decreases our chance of winning. But if Cam and offense being as good as they can do, we're very hard to defeat

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Under Rivera/Cam era, the Panthers are 13-1 when scoring 30pts & over with that 1 loss to Detroit in 2011

 

 

2012 & 2013 ONLY

 

24pts & UP, the Panthers are 11-1 in 2012 & 2013. That 1 Loss IN ATL last season

 

In games scored 21pts BEFORE the 4th quarter in 2012, they're 6-1 ^ Look one sentence up. In 2013, they're 4-0 = 10-1.

 

21pts period or LESS than 21pts, 2012 & 2013 they're a combined 1-9

 

You ask 24 and 21. what about 22 and 23. Well the Panthers in 2012 and 2013 are 0-2 scoring 22 in Chicago in 2012 and 23 to Buffalo in 2013

 

When you combine all that and find a median. The Panthers are 11-1 24pts and above, 1-11 24pts and below in 2012 & 2013. Creepy it's the exact opposite isn't it

 

It shows to me in defensive battled games, it decreases our chance of winning. But if Cam and offense being as good as they can do, we're very hard to defeat

 

Good stuff but I'm willing to bet that there are plenty of teams that have similar stats. Correlation and causation and stuff. 

 

Do you win because you score points or do you score points because you win?

 

My go to stat is how we do against tough defenses and tough front fours...and surprise we are crushing the weak ones and struggling against the tough ones.

 

We face two tough ones over the next 12 days. Get back to me then.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Under Rivera/Cam era, the Panthers are 13-1 when scoring 30pts & over with that 1 loss to Detroit in 2011

 

 

2012 & 2013 ONLY

 

24pts & UP, the Panthers are 11-1 in 2012 & 2013. That 1 Loss IN ATL last season

 

In games scored 21pts BEFORE the 4th quarter in 2012, they're 6-1 ^ Look one sentence up. In 2013, they're 4-0 = 10-1.

 

21pts period or LESS than 21pts, 2012 & 2013 they're a combined 1-9

 

You ask 24 and 21. what about 22 and 23. Well the Panthers in 2012 and 2013 are 0-2 scoring 22 in Chicago in 2012 and 23 to Buffalo in 2013

 

When you combine all that and find a median. The Panthers are 11-1 24pts and above, 1-11 24pts and below in 2012 & 2013. Creepy it's the exact opposite isn't it

 

It shows to me in defensive battled games, it decreases our chance of winning. But if Cam and offense being as good as they can do, we're very hard to defeat

Excellent analysis! Don't let these fools discourage you from doing things like this in the future either. Those are all interesting facts that I didn't know. I will have this in mind during every single game now. Very cool, your research has made a difference in this fans perspective and knowledge base.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • As far as elite/elevate talent QB’s It’s Allen Mahomes Jackson and Burrow that’s it.  Then we have tiers and those can be debated all day Dak is a good QB but I know this board would want him out of Charlotte if he was the QB here. 2 playoff wins in 10 years. Justin Herbert no playoff wins. Threw 4 interceptions in last years playoff game. 23 TD passes last year. 20 the year below and 25 the year before that. This board loves stats without context and these stats aren’t saying they’re much above complimentary  Kyler Murray isn’t good. I’m not sure how he made this list.  Caleb Williams, Trevor Lawrence both benefiting from some real good offensive coaches right now. They’re both complimentary pieces until proven otherwise  I like Jordan Love. Always have. I wanted to draft him but he isn’t a superstar.  CJ Stroud hasn’t been much better than Bryce after his rookie season. After that Bears game year 2 his numbers very similar to Bryce I will say I think Drake Maye is well on his way to becoming the next top tier QB if I had to pick one from this entire list. I’d also say Baker Mayfield is a damn good QB and I’d take him over most of those guys not in the elite category  Now if you want to debate tools and which QB’s possess tools to put them in higher tiers that’s a completely different discussion. Most QB’s on your main list all have those physical tools that will keep you thinking he’ll become the next top tier QB. They’ll sprinkle in a “wow” play or two a game. Bryce will never look that way. Young’s game at its peak will physically always look different and I think that’s where most people struggle when it comes to seeing how Young’s can be successful in the league  All QB’s need a team around them. I think the Bills are failing Josh Allen much like the Panthers did Cam. Beane and McDermott using same blueprint with Bills team. Josh Allen hasn’t had much in terms of WR’s and it’s ultimately costing them when it matters the most     
×
×
  • Create New...