Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

DRAFT SPECULATION/NEWS THREAD


MichaelNewtonII

Recommended Posts

My source who have been pretty legit in the past is giving me words that Lavine will be the pick at no9. And, yes we will keep the pick. Lavine supposedly blew the hat off MJ's head. Will be drafted as a PG.

 

I echo above Chuck haha.  I wouldn't be mad though..as Bill Simmons would call him, he could be our Zero Guard.  

 

I think him or Smart could be the pick.  Our Stauskas..or Young.  One of those 4 imo. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My source who have been pretty legit in the past is giving me words that Lavine will be the pick at no9. And, yes we will keep the pick. Lavine supposedly blew the hat off MJ's head. Will be drafted as a PG.

 

 

This kid could be a beast.  I only watched one of their NCAA tourney games and he looked freakish for an 18 year old. 

 

 

would not be mad

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dammit I still want Marcus Smart.  Dude is gonna be a steal if he drops out of the top 5, I just dont see any way he falls all the way to 9

 

On a side note, why is everyone so high on Exum?  I've only seen him on youtube vids (and hadnt even watched many of those before today), but man that guy looks raw.  His competition in Australia is straight up awful, it looks like hes been playing high school JV teams for the last year

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dammit I still want Marcus Smart. Dude is gonna be a steal if he drops out of the top 5, I just dont see any way he falls all the way to 9

On a side note, why is everyone so high on Exum? I've only seen him on youtube vids (and hadnt even watched many of those before today), but man that guy looks raw. His competition in Australia is straight up awful, it looks like hes been playing high school JV teams for the last year

Look what he did to Payton at 1:23.

Struggled vs. the more physical Smart.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dammit I still want Marcus Smart. Dude is gonna be a steal if he drops out of the top 5, I just dont see any way he falls all the way to 9

On a side note, why is everyone so high on Exum? I've only seen him on youtube vids (and hadnt even watched many of those before today), but man that guy looks raw. His competition in Australia is straight up awful, it looks like hes been playing high school JV teams for the last year

A fan of Smart too. But, looked bad during Lakers workout (previous page: workout with Lavine and Vonleh). Not going to take that into consideration tho, but was pretty bad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yeah, Darnold is basically a really high level game manager. Put him on a good team where he isn't required to provide lift and he can shine. But when you need him to do the franchise QB thing and put the team in his back here comes the INTs. He just doesn't seem to have any positions on his dial between "super conservative take whatever's there and take care of the ball" and "YOLO!!! There's a receiver down there somewhere in that sea of defenders!"
    • See, it's posts like this that show me how many of you are taking my post as an anti Dowdle post and saying he didn't have a good game, but that's the furthest thing from my intention and what I'm trying to say. Because that's the comparison you're making with Bryce, it's adding or removing a small handful of plays from their stats and saying "this is the game they could have had instead" I'm literally only talking about the play calling from the game, it's literally in the title of the thread, that we still have play calling problems. I'm saying that people are going to get stuck on the 200 yard rushing game by a player and extrapolate that to "well Canales must have called a good game" and I'm trying to say not to fall for that mirage. Because 6 big runs do not make for a well called game when we had over 60 snaps. Even beyond that, if you add in the two 20+ yard catches from T-Mac and the one XL had, and you're looking at 9 of over 60 snaps that accounted for close to 60% of our yards in the game. That's a few big plays covering up for coaching deficiencies, that's NOT a well called 60 minutes of football. Had he had the 200 yards because Canales' play calling was keeping the defense on their heels, not knowing what we were doing next, and Dowdle was ripping of 8-12 yard runs on a consistent basis, then yea, that would be something to be excited about with Canales finally calling a good game for a change. Our offense is predictable and the play design is basic, there is nothing I've seen out of Canales' offense that says he's able to scheme and call plays to outsmart the defense, which is something all the elite offensive coaches are able to do in this day and age.
    • Dante Moore is the top pick in a couple of mock drafts now. 
×
×
  • Create New...