Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Mike Pereira's take on the no-call


JawnyBlaze

Recommended Posts

It was a bad call and I don't give a fugg. NE fans complaining about bad calls.......bwahahahahahahahahaha......wait.....hahahahahahahaha. That franchise has no credibility complaining about bad calls. Karma is a bitch. Patriots can lick my left nut

That no call didn't decide the game

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'll take the win but let's not act as if that was a clear cut call, Luke needs to cut that bs out before it cost us. Every since that V Jax catch last year he's been mugging the poo out of receivers,just play coverage and don't give the refs anything to throw a flag about.

 

With That being Said Fug the Pats and Scrum Brady

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'll take the win but let's not act as if that was a clear cut call, Luke needs to cut that bs out before it cost us. Every since that V Jax catch last year he's been mugging the poo out of receivers,just play coverage and don't give the refs anything to throw a flag about.

With That being Said Fug the Pats and Scrum Brady

I agree. This poo will catch up with us. We still gotta face Jimmy graham twice. I'd like to see a more disciplined coverage with those types of TEs. As far as the call, refs make bad calls all the time and they pick up flags all the time. If the ref just properly explained the no call as per the NFL rule book instead of "there is no foul, game is over, i'm outta here" this wouldn't be news

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[qt] You could make a case that the pass might have been uncatachable, but the flag was thrown and you should stay with it. My thoughts [/qt]

[qt] My thoughts..Since the flag was thrown they should have stayed with the call. There was clear contact before the ball was intercepted. More. [/qt]

Sounds to me that he just doesn't want to say the Patriots should have lost the game.

In regards to "they threw the flag the should have stuck with it", it looked to me he one reference threw the flag so they could discuss it. Easier to pick up the flag than to not throw it then decide later it should have been a penalty. My main evidence to this fact is that the guy that threw the flag is the one that called the other official over to discuss it.

 

 

His logic that "because the flag was thrown, they should have stayed with it" is complete and utter bullshit.  Whether they stayed with the call or not, the discussion by the refs was EXACTLY what they should have done.  The ref that threw the flag was watchign Gronk and Keek.....and there was some contact.  He was not focused on the ball.

 

The other ref focused on the ball and the catch clearly made the right call that the ball was completely uncatchable.  It was nearly 10 yards away from Gronk.

 

The refs made the right call that you don't let contact with a player who has zero shot at catching the ball be a call that decides the game.

 

And if the whiney fuging chowder heads and medio don't like it....they can kiss my white hairy ass.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why is no one on ESPN/NFLN still not bring up the fact that even if Keek wasnt "hugging" Gronk, he still would have been standing there. So Gronk would still have to get around Keek, then somehow prevent Lester from jumping the route.

All that while gronk has to stop his momentum, plant his foot and jump BACK through 2 of our guys to catch that ball, all in a matter of 1/3 of a second. Not happening

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The fact that the interception was probably 5 yards from Gronk while his momentum was taking him to back of endzone...I can see where they pull the flag and I'm thankful for that.

 

This play looked identical to a play that they did NOT pick up the flag for and Keuchly got called for PI in one of those games we lost in the final drive.  Buffalo maybe?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • After seeing hits in the last two UDFA pools, I do not in this group sorta of a let down after I gassed myself up.  Not like I know of their games, but just expected more. The duke DT only has to beat out hunte (2025 UDFA) or Ray (DL coach's kid) or even Cam Jackson mid 2025 5th.  I thought they would bring in more edges, IOL, TEs, etc...
    • My 2 favorite picks, since you didn't ask? 3. Brazzell II.  A 1000 yard WR with 4.37 speed and checks all the boxes for a Z Wide Receiver.  IN THE THIRD ROUND!!! 5.  Sam Hecht.  I think he will take over as the starter at some point this season and never look back.  IN THE FIFTH ROUND. Runner Up:  2. Hunter:  We were targeting a DT early in this draft because we did very little to replace Robinson in free agency.  Hunter was our guy and he will start. In addition to that, you got a starting tackle that should man one side of the new OL we will build for Bryce's second contract. A starting WR, offensive lineman, defensive lineman and possible Offensive tackle (at some point during this year from this draft will start.  UNREAL. In addition, I don't doubt that Wheatley (5th round) takes the FS job by next year and Lee III is Jackson's replacement in 2027.   Finally, even Kuwatch should be a special teams demon and LB depth.   Last year's draft was so good it was ugly.  This one will turn out to be uglier.  No offense Basbear--this ain't about you.
×
×
  • Create New...