Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Ryan Kalil Interview w/ Rich Eisen


fieryprophet

Recommended Posts

http://richeisen.nfl.com/2013/12/03/rich-eisen-podcast-rainn-wilson-and-ryan-kalil/

 

Starts at 2/5th of the way into the podcast

 

- Addresses slow start, that he had a feeling that the team would turn it around due to hard work

 

- Talks about Cam Newton, the unfair media scrutiny, his standing in the locker room

 

- Says New Orleans game deserves the hype, volume is up there

 

- Loves Riverboat moniker because Ron hates it, says Ron's always been a great coach

 

- Touches on USC hiring Sarkasian

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Who is Ryan Kalil? Is that him standing beside Rich Eisen the picture on the posted link? He looks like a farmer, not some media guy or team reporter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

These guys on First Take are a joke. 

 

Instead of them saying, "Thank God Cam's teammates finally stepped up". Instead they say, "now he's learned  that he doesn't have to do it all". 

 

And instead of Stephen A. Smith stating, 'Well the media was wrong blaming their losing on Cam'. Instead he essentially says 'whooptedamdoo'; saying, 'so what he's learned he doesn't have to do it all', like it was no big deal. And he still doesn't mention Rivera becoming a better coach, though he referenced him. 

 

Such biased reporting. They can never just give Cam a straight compliment, or challenge/criticize his teammates or coaches for their lack of production (as if Cam could stop them from producing altogether). SMH

 

And though Herm Edwards briefly mentioned Cam's great situational Football, he still had to use the defense as a crutch to Cam. It just goes to show, when a show wants to have a certain agenda, they will do it. 

 

And they called Cam's 2012 a bad year (unless they're talking about the won/loss record). SMH/LOL

 

Gotta Luv ESPN

Link to comment
Share on other sites

These guys on First Take are a joke. 

 

Instead of them saying, "Thank God Cam's teammates finally stepped up". Instead they say, "now he's learned  that he doesn't have to do it all". 

 

And instead of Stephen A. Smith stating, 'Well the media was wrong blaming their losing on Cam'. Instead he essentially says 'whooptedamdoo'; saying, 'so what he's learned he doesn't have to do it all', like it was no big deal. And he still doesn't mention Rivera becoming a better coach, though he referenced him. 

 

Such biased reporting. They can never just give Cam a straight compliment, or challenge/criticize his teammates or coaches for their lack of production (as if Cam could stop them from producing altogether). SMH

 

And though Herm Edwards briefly mentioned Cam's great situational Football, he still had to use the defense as a crutch to Cam. It just goes to show, when a show wants to have a certain agenda, they will do it. 

 

And they called Cam's 2012 a bad year (unless they're talking about the won/loss record). SMH/LOL

 

Gotta Luv ESPN

 

That's how those guys on first take roll.  They never want to commit to giving players (all sport included) credit where it's due, that way, if need be, they can cover their ass, jump off the bandwagon and say I was skeptical or never really on board with said player(s) getting all this credit and attention.  Unfortunately, It's gonna take winning a SB to get the credit that not only cam and riverboat ron deserve at this point, but the whole team, especially from the first take "crew" and pretty much the majority of ESPN.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Who is Ryan Kalil? Is that him standing beside Rich Eisen the picture on the posted link? He looks like a farmer, not some media guy or team reporter.

 

I shouldn't get sucked into this because I am almost 1000000% sure this is a troll job, Ryan Kalil is the starting center for your Carolina Panthers. 

 

Now for my question to you, are you a teenager?  This is the only good explanation for that comment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Cards weren't really blitzing that much the entire game.  The ones they sent just wrecked Bryce.  My opinion is you are over fixated on what happened as we got close to the goal.   The one possession we had in the 3rd quarter? That was a freebie to get down there.  It was literally just checkdowns to the TE when we weren't running the ball down... 24 taking up the entire quarter.  Next quarter Cards were inviting the exact same behavior.  Which is why they were both clock eating small ball 14 play drives. 
    • I don't think they changed as much as you think between the INT and the final sack (immediate pressure with 4 linemen). They definitely stopped blitzing as much, if a blitz means rushing more than the front 4/5. They definitely did some exotic packages where they sent LBs/DBs and dropped linemen into coverage though. The fumble and INT were both blitzes. And yes they were successful. And yes, I agreed with Bryce not taking care of the ball. Really not many answers on those plays - just take the sack and live another play (unless you're Lamar). Which he didn't do. And no, you can't run prevent on the goal line. What's prevent defense to you? Alignment, personnel, cushion, etc.? Just curious. My reply was to the post that they sat back in some soft zone the whole game - until the end, when it mattered. That's not true. They blitzed, they disguised coverages and blitzers, they pressed, they bailed, they covered the flats, all of that. Not trying to argue. Just trying to inform. Actually they only blitzed once on the final drive, and the DB got away with a bad hold on Tremayne. Otherwise looked like it would have been a completion for a first down. The Cardinals' final drive defense looked a lot like the rest of the game.  I know it's easy to get upset after a lose (I'm guilty), but Mondays are when cooler heads prevail. Right? Emotions can make us seem like we don't know what we're talking about. The Huddle isn't supposed to be that. I always saw it as a place to go discuss the Carolina Panthers with more than the casual fan, and their emotionally charged opinions. I can get that at the local grocery store, where they don't know anything about NC/SC, let alone the Panthers. 
    • Poor guy went from the Ravens to this disaster
×
×
  • Create New...