Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

So... we beat the Warriors 115-111 tonight.


TylerDurden

Recommended Posts

This is starting to become a a usual thing. Every time I criticize Kemba, he goes on and have huge games. Wondering if he reads my posts on here.

Then, the sec I praise the team, they play like poo.

U need to start doing this more often. Add in some things like"Kemba can't dish out 12 assists and score 30" :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Kemba keep playing like this he may just be the damn long term answer. ;) see what I did there.

But all joking aside, I want the best for Kemba. He just have to do it on a consistent basis.

Lol

Yeah he's gotta be consistent. I think he can be even better if we get scorers around him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This team is up and down. Can't ever tell who they are. But they are playing well so far this season. Wrong time to do so tho.

But back to Kemba, I hope he can keep on playing like this. I want him to be the answer. We need stability and guys who can contribute at a Hugh level for a long time. Guys who you drafted. That's how winning teams are built.

Off topic, but whatever. I never have gotten the hype on Kyrie Irving whatsoever tho. Good college player and deserved to be the no1 pick. However, I'm confused with the hype in the pro. Talented kid with potential but has not shown it yet coming from a no1pick in his 3rd season. I have Westbrook, Wall, Holiday, Lillard, Rubio, and even at this point I would take Carter-Williams over Irving with just the little games I've seen out of him. Kemba have done more to help this Charlotte team than what Iriving have done for the Cavs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lol

Yeah he's gotta be consistent. I think he can be even better if we get scorers around him.

Imagine a Parker or especially a Julius Randle to pass the ball to.

I still love me some Marcus Smart.

Aaron Harrison is playing really well for UK too. Has a deep range 3. Would love to have that kid with the Detriot or Portland's pick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Imagine a Parker or especially a Julius Randle to pass the ball to.

I still love me some Marcus Smart.

Aaron Harrison is playing really well for UK too. Has a deep range 3. Would love to have that kid with the Detriot or Portland's pick.

Honestly I haven't followed or watched smart any while at OK state. How good is he. Is he a taller Kemba that just scores? Does he pass good and make the team better? What NBA pg would u compare him to? Just curious

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I would say that he's pulling things out of his ass to get people to visit his site.
    • Yep. I was hoping for and calling for a day three guy. But I didn’t research the position to say if we should or should‘t have jumped at a particular guy at a particular spot.    And everything I read said it was a poor draft for RBs depth wise. I guess when Seattle takes a backup RB in the 1st, that kind of backs that up.    I definitely think we should keep 4 running backs and if King can play well enough then keep him too.    I believe I heard Canales say we are a running team (talking about drafting a WR he will be needing to block as well as catch). Well if we are gonna be a running team by identity we don’t need to stock the WR room to overflowing. If one room has to sacrifice, it should not be the RB room given our circumstances. 
    • If there's a pattern I'm definitely picking up from Dan and company is a philosophy of making trades where we try not to sacrifice the number of draft picks we have by day's end. In other words, we're not giving up three picks for one, or giving up a future pick to make a pick today. And even if we give up something at the start, we make trades later to make up for that initial loss. Here's how it stacked up for 2026: How we started: 19, 51, 83, 119, 158, 159, 200 How we ended: 19, 49, 83, 129, 144, 151, 227 (no future picks sacrificed) Ultimately, we moved up two spots in the second to ensure we got someone we coveted, gave up a few spots for our fourth round pick, but then had better picks in the 5th (and got really good value out of them), and had a worse 7th rounder which isn't that big of a loss anyways.  At this point, we can question who they draft, but they're pretty good maneuvering across the draft board.
×
×
  • Create New...