Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Pat Kirwin says we don't need to change that much to win this week


panthers55

Recommended Posts

Sirius is about the best place to listen to coach interview, players interviews and discussions about football typically by people who played the game and in Kirwin's case was a general manager for the Jets.  If you miss him you miss a gem.

 

 Funny that you would criticize him for giving a shallow analysis by making an even shallower analysis given you haven't even listened to him enough to have an informed opinion.

You forget, it's just cool to hate everything these days.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Check out Sirius radio Channel 88 and judge for yourself.

 

"Moving the chains" is on from 3-7pm daily and Riveria gets interviewed at 4pm every tuesday.

 

It is the most informative radio football show going.

You are right, Kirwin and Miller are a great pair and really know their football.  I miss Tim Ryan who could really speak to line play but MIller is surely a good analyst regarding the quarterback position.

 

Sometimes around here you have to consider the source and ignore their comments. Some folks come here to contribute and enrich, others come here to tear down and belittle. It takes all kinds. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's not "belittling" of you're pointing out the fact that what he said that you're relaying sounds exactly the same as the 10,000 posts people make about what the panthers need to do to win any game this season

Sack up and take a different opinion on something for once. You have a hard time avoiding going off on tangents because you can't indoctrinate everybody on this forum

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also you pretty much deserve to be belittled when you're not offering anything else to the discussion besides spamming the same word in response.

You like Pat Kirwan, I think it's not worth subscribing to when you can find better insider content on the internet on demand, but because you've got an axe to grind with me you can't even let me disagree with you without getting pissy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cam needs to read his passes and make a run commitment with the determination and speed that he did in the Pats game here.....

 

They took Cam's running option to move the chains out of the game in the dome because he spent way too much time trying to read the passing lanes and then was a step or two behind from getting a chain moving run.............

 

Play action passing and some runs by Cam will set their defense into over drive about what to do..............then a lane opens up and the big pass play will be available.

 

Its best we move the chains and keep Brees off the field................however I have no problem with Cam and the offense using anything past the Saints 20 as 4 down territory rather than field goals............I'd rather have that extra down and give the ball over to them deep in their territory than to kick a field goal............we can't play catch up to them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I personally find the MTC show not only informative, but the best radio show about football.

 

I can't stand listening to any 610 show for more than 30 minutes, and my personal best for "the drive" is 5 minutes.

ESPN Radio is also nearly unlistenable, I can stand Commercials in the Morning (also known as Mike & Mike) for about 15 minutes, but since I can hear the same rehash of ESPN "contributors" on the TV during ANY of their NFL shows, I don't consider it a "must listen". Also the Me,ME,ME!! show (Colin Cowturd) is good for 5 minutes, until he becomes self obsessed about some ignorant 1st world issues plaguing his life.

 

It's really amazing how poor sports reporting is in general, and how little it takes to stand out in the field.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also you pretty much deserve to be belittled when you're not offering anything else to the discussion besides spamming the same word in response.

You like Pat Kirwan, I think it's not worth subscribing to when you can find better insider content on the internet on demand, but because you've got an axe to grind with me you can't even let me disagree with you without getting pissy.

If you only belittled a poster once in a while you might have some rationale for doing what you do.  But the overwhelming majority of your posts are snarky belittling comments and personal attacks that you share as if you have a valid point of view and anyone cares what you think.

 

If you haven't listened to Kirwin for any length of time then you have no idea whether he has something to offer or not but like usual just tear things down and make uninformed negative comments.

 

Secondly this is something you do with many posters not just me.  I am just one of the folks who point out your juvenile behavior.  That is not an axe to grind simply stating what I suspect many others believe as well.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's not "belittling" of you're pointing out the fact that what he said that you're relaying sounds exactly the same as the 10,000 posts people make about what the panthers need to do to win any game this season

Sack up and take a different opinion on something for once. You have a hard time avoiding going off on tangents because you can't indoctrinate everybody on this forum

I pointed out his comments in general to generate a discussion.  I don't remember asking you for an opinion about my need to sack up or going off on tangents. Why do you need to comment on what I said by making personal attacks.  You can disagree on the content of the article without making personal attacks.  Or may be you can't which is sad really for anyone who has to put up with you for any amount of time.  I can't imagine anyone doing it voluntarily.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you can point one personal attack out against you "instead of assuming there's one in there!", then let's hash it out. But you won't, because all I was doing was disaggreeing that the show is good enough to pay for.

Also how would you have responded if it was me who was just going "you're wrong" "oh wrong" "wrongity wrong wrong" in response to your posts? Yeah I'm sure you wouldn't write up some angry response.

Also lol nice cosign there madhatter. Brown nose just a little bit more and maybe he'll never find out about the dumb racist comments you make about welfare queens and xboxes in the tinderbox.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I personally find the MTC show not only informative, but the best radio show about football.

I can't stand listening to any 610 show for more than 30 minutes, and my personal best for "the drive" is 5 minutes.

ESPN Radio is also nearly unlistenable, I can stand Commercials in the Morning (also known as Mike & Mike) for about 15 minutes, but since I can hear the same rehash of ESPN "contributors" on the TV during ANY of their NFL shows, I don't consider it a "must listen". Also the Me,ME,ME!! show (Colin Cowturd) is good for 5 minutes, until he becomes self obsessed about some ignorant 1st world issues plaguing his life.

It's really amazing how poor sports reporting is in general, and how little it takes to stand out in the field.

Honestly I don't like any sports radio. Whether it's Mike Francesa yelling at fan callers or Stephen A. Smith talking to air. To me it's just a poor format to get really good information on anything. I know there's a difference between terrestrial radio guys, most of which need to act like sideshows to generate listeners, and pat kirwan, but I've never felt like I got enough information that can't be found anywhere else listening to this show.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Was watching NFLN during a workout today and they were discussing the 'Achilles heel' for New Orleans being the O-line.  Said they are not the same team on the road when playing in loud, hostile environments because the O-line cannot anticipate the snap count as much and the slight hesitation gives the D-line an advantage.  Also said that Brees is not the same when they can't establish their rhythm.

 

This game will be a prime topic of conversation for most sports-talk shows next week.  Great time to introduce the country to BOA and our homefield advantage.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...