Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Why are dumb sport analysts worshiped?


hdevonxz

Recommended Posts

What ever happened to the good ol' days when just the facts were dicsussed, or at least an opinion was presented in a clear and non ignorant way. Now it seems like the only thing that matters is how loud, personal, and annoying you present yourself on the air.

Guys like Skip Bayless, that prick on sports nation, and Jim Rome make it seem like ESPN is more concerned with winning over the people that watch Jerry Springer.

Something is wrong when "TV personalities" can actually get hired over actual analysts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rough estimate: 90% of the so-called NFL analysts have no idea what they are talking about and can't even be bothered to look up facts (which, rumor has it, are widely available on something called teh internets) to make sure if they are true or not before they go off on rants.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What ever happened to the good ol' days when just the facts were dicsussed, or at least an opinion was presented in a clear and non ignorant way. Now it seems like the only thing that matters is how loud, personal, and annoying you present yourself on the air.

Guys like Skip Bayless, that prick on sports nation, and Jim Rome make it seem like ESPN is more concerned with winning over the people that watch Jerry Springer.

Something is wrong when "TV personalities" can actually get hired over actual analysts.

i think the point of sportsnation is be for a young crowd..and people hate skip but they keep coming back..lol

i like NFL network and FOX sports myself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

it's just ridiculous that then can get away with sometimes MAKING UP STUFF, like right on the spot.

They're supposed to be professionals but you can still turn on the tv and hear them saying a player has had problems with their teammates, when no such event has ever been reported. If I was said player I would be angered.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's fitting. Most sports "fans" are also completely ignorant about most things concerning their sport. People who hang out and post on fansites like this are typically far more knowledgeable than your average "fan" who you see wearing a hat or a jersey.

I know plenty of people who claim to be big football fans, but can't name a single offensive lineman on their team. These people also don't go on the internet looking for more info, so all of their knowledge comes from what they're told by ESPN.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ESPN and Sportscenter got away from where they came from: Reporting sports news.

They got too big for their pants when they began bringing in network #s because they got more average idiots to watch them. Now they are afraid to lose those same idiots by reporting controversial news.

They sold out for the number of views they can pull in and they have no competition.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's fitting. Most sports "fans" are also completely ignorant about most things concerning their sport. People who hang out and post on fansites like this are typically far more knowledgeable than your average "fan" who you see wearing a hat or a jersey.

I know plenty of people who claim to be big football fans, but can't name a single offensive lineman on their team. These people also don't go on the internet looking for more info, so all of their knowledge comes from what they're told by ESPN.

EXACTLY

And I don't know if I'm the weird one or are they? I could honestly go up to the common sports fan at a bar or something and I could probably tell them more about football or their own team than they know.

I mean honestly how many people can name their entire teams roster?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What ever happened to the good ol' days when just the facts were dicsussed, or at least an opinion was presented in a clear and non ignorant way. Now it seems like the only thing that matters is how loud, personal, and annoying you present yourself on the air.

Guys like Skip Bayless, that prick on sports nation, and Jim Rome make it seem like ESPN is more concerned with winning over the people that watch Jerry Springer.

Something is wrong when "TV personalities" can actually get hired over actual analysts.

Reason is that ESPN is all about ratings, viewership, etc....

Just like sensational headlines, they are trying to do the same thing.

Problem is they are alienating true sports fans in the process.

I used to work for ESPN in Charlotte about 14 years ago....back when they were all about reporting sports related news.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Colin Cowherd is the guy from sportsnation and I do not have a problem with him mainly because I have heard him talk up Jake Delhomme before.

You might have heard his Delhomme comment on Sportsnation, or on the Herd, he has a 4 hour show on ESPN radio 5 days every week. He's pretty practical and commonsense, a trend different from most commentators, though very egotistical on everything. But he does have a high view on Jake, whether Panther fans do or not...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Since Walter Cronkite died. A lot of people have been talking about how he told you the news. No speculation, no rumor, no celebrity. Just the news. He didn't think 24 news was a good thing and he is being proved right. They don't talk about important things anymore. And it's the same with sport news. Too much fluff, opinion and speculation. And at the end of the day you don't know anything about the world or the world of sports. But you know Romo broke up with Jessica and Favre tweeted something about his tractor.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Since Walter Cronkite died. A lot of people have been talking about how he told you the news. No speculation, no rumor, no celebrity. Just the news. He didn't think 24 news was a good thing and he is being proved right. They don't talk about important things anymore. And it's the same with sport news. Too much fluff, opinion and speculation. And at the end of the day you don't know anything about the world or the world of sports. But you know Romo broke up with Jessica and Favre tweeted something about his tractor.

rep, spread it must be.

:yoda:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • That was a good segment. Watched every minute of it and would highly recommend it to all fans.
    • "So much of what the Panthers are going to do next week isn't dictated by their preference, but by what happens above them. That's another benefit of not getting locked into need. For instance, if you're thinking you want a receiver, seeing five or six of them go off the board and reacting by taking the sixth or seventh off your list instead of the first (or second or third) something else isn't necessarily wise." https://www.panthers.com/news/ask-the-old-guy-back-into-the-weeds-of-the-nfl-draft-bryce-young-charlotte-hornets-mock-draft This is what some don't seem to get, I don't care how many times it is said: You're NOT going to draft an inferior person at one position, just because that position is perceived as, or is in fact, a bigger need. That would basically nullify, or at least lessen, the reason why you set yourself up via free agency to be able to take the BPA/BAP on the board in the first place.  Yes, the process is complex, very much involved and ongoing, but the overall philosophy is not rocket science. You set yourself up in order not to be pigeonholed into taking a lower graded player at the expense of a higher graded one. This is why Morgan, Gantt and countless of others say the same thing. This is why it's just nonsensical to set yourself in a position where you don't have to, but then act like you have to come hell or high water: "Oh, we have to draft [whatever position], and we can't draft [this position]."  I'm good with whatever they do, until proven otherwise, but even then, you have to be mature enough to know that drafting is an imperfect exercise, filled with hits and misses. And, you generally don't know if you've hit, and especially missed, right away. Moreover, like I've said before, sometimes two players--different positions or not--can both be hits on their respective teams, so in that sense, it's not purely about a right or wrong pick as much as it's about putting puzzle pieces together at the time the best way that you know how.  At the end of the day, people are going to believe what they want to believe, but one thing that's true is that what the Panthers do regarding the draft is dependent upon what others do, and what others do can and does change things. That being the case, it's just another reason why you can't go in with tunnel vision. The thought of doing that is preposterous.
    • He is a talented player with a lot of potential but ultimately he is a legend in his own mind and the minds of those who attack on his behalf when people pinpoint inconvenient truths. I could see people being so hostile over him if he actually had that kind of juice but he doesn't. Even in the Heat win LaMelo took 31 shots and was 40%. If not for Coby White's late heroics we would have lost in regulation. The reality is we do have pieces in place to compete in the playoffs but in year 6 and with a supermax and a salary that is only going to increase over the next few years LaMelo Ball simply does not look like a franchise centerpiece that you can go on multiple playoff runs with. Look at someone like Trae Young. His team moved on. And he actually took them to the conference finals. The Hornets are at a crossroads. Very tough conversations need to be had in the offseason.
×
×
  • Create New...