Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Why are dumb sport analysts worshiped?


hdevonxz

Recommended Posts

What ever happened to the good ol' days when just the facts were dicsussed, or at least an opinion was presented in a clear and non ignorant way. Now it seems like the only thing that matters is how loud, personal, and annoying you present yourself on the air.

Guys like Skip Bayless, that prick on sports nation, and Jim Rome make it seem like ESPN is more concerned with winning over the people that watch Jerry Springer.

Something is wrong when "TV personalities" can actually get hired over actual analysts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rough estimate: 90% of the so-called NFL analysts have no idea what they are talking about and can't even be bothered to look up facts (which, rumor has it, are widely available on something called teh internets) to make sure if they are true or not before they go off on rants.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What ever happened to the good ol' days when just the facts were dicsussed, or at least an opinion was presented in a clear and non ignorant way. Now it seems like the only thing that matters is how loud, personal, and annoying you present yourself on the air.

Guys like Skip Bayless, that prick on sports nation, and Jim Rome make it seem like ESPN is more concerned with winning over the people that watch Jerry Springer.

Something is wrong when "TV personalities" can actually get hired over actual analysts.

i think the point of sportsnation is be for a young crowd..and people hate skip but they keep coming back..lol

i like NFL network and FOX sports myself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

it's just ridiculous that then can get away with sometimes MAKING UP STUFF, like right on the spot.

They're supposed to be professionals but you can still turn on the tv and hear them saying a player has had problems with their teammates, when no such event has ever been reported. If I was said player I would be angered.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's fitting. Most sports "fans" are also completely ignorant about most things concerning their sport. People who hang out and post on fansites like this are typically far more knowledgeable than your average "fan" who you see wearing a hat or a jersey.

I know plenty of people who claim to be big football fans, but can't name a single offensive lineman on their team. These people also don't go on the internet looking for more info, so all of their knowledge comes from what they're told by ESPN.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ESPN and Sportscenter got away from where they came from: Reporting sports news.

They got too big for their pants when they began bringing in network #s because they got more average idiots to watch them. Now they are afraid to lose those same idiots by reporting controversial news.

They sold out for the number of views they can pull in and they have no competition.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's fitting. Most sports "fans" are also completely ignorant about most things concerning their sport. People who hang out and post on fansites like this are typically far more knowledgeable than your average "fan" who you see wearing a hat or a jersey.

I know plenty of people who claim to be big football fans, but can't name a single offensive lineman on their team. These people also don't go on the internet looking for more info, so all of their knowledge comes from what they're told by ESPN.

EXACTLY

And I don't know if I'm the weird one or are they? I could honestly go up to the common sports fan at a bar or something and I could probably tell them more about football or their own team than they know.

I mean honestly how many people can name their entire teams roster?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What ever happened to the good ol' days when just the facts were dicsussed, or at least an opinion was presented in a clear and non ignorant way. Now it seems like the only thing that matters is how loud, personal, and annoying you present yourself on the air.

Guys like Skip Bayless, that prick on sports nation, and Jim Rome make it seem like ESPN is more concerned with winning over the people that watch Jerry Springer.

Something is wrong when "TV personalities" can actually get hired over actual analysts.

Reason is that ESPN is all about ratings, viewership, etc....

Just like sensational headlines, they are trying to do the same thing.

Problem is they are alienating true sports fans in the process.

I used to work for ESPN in Charlotte about 14 years ago....back when they were all about reporting sports related news.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Colin Cowherd is the guy from sportsnation and I do not have a problem with him mainly because I have heard him talk up Jake Delhomme before.

You might have heard his Delhomme comment on Sportsnation, or on the Herd, he has a 4 hour show on ESPN radio 5 days every week. He's pretty practical and commonsense, a trend different from most commentators, though very egotistical on everything. But he does have a high view on Jake, whether Panther fans do or not...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Since Walter Cronkite died. A lot of people have been talking about how he told you the news. No speculation, no rumor, no celebrity. Just the news. He didn't think 24 news was a good thing and he is being proved right. They don't talk about important things anymore. And it's the same with sport news. Too much fluff, opinion and speculation. And at the end of the day you don't know anything about the world or the world of sports. But you know Romo broke up with Jessica and Favre tweeted something about his tractor.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Since Walter Cronkite died. A lot of people have been talking about how he told you the news. No speculation, no rumor, no celebrity. Just the news. He didn't think 24 news was a good thing and he is being proved right. They don't talk about important things anymore. And it's the same with sport news. Too much fluff, opinion and speculation. And at the end of the day you don't know anything about the world or the world of sports. But you know Romo broke up with Jessica and Favre tweeted something about his tractor.

rep, spread it must be.

:yoda:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Let's be completely honest about this... Our WR room is AT and a bunch of question marks. Thielen is the only guy we know who knows the route tree completely, understands play calls and can regularly get open/beat close coverage when necessary. He's long in the tooth, isn't the speediest guy on the field but he plays like a pro, starting level wide receiver. Xavier, last season looked great at first, but man he kind of petered out down the stretch and would disappear in a number of games. He wasn't reliable on routes or getting open and where he was supposed to be a king at contested catches, he often looked a bit intimidated. I'm not saying he's a washout by any means. Anyone with his size, speed and catch radius could make it big in the NFL, but can he do it? He'll need to show more than he did in the preseason before we can really rely on him as a WR1 or WR2.  Coker was a revelation last season, he really played way above his (non)draft status and flashed multiple times in games and was a steady performer. What we need to find out, though, is whether he was benefiting from being an unknown that wasn't getting maximum effort from opposing DBs or if he was just outworking and outhustling everyone on the field. We should find out this season. We sure as hell didn't find out much in the pre-season (from him or any receiver or QB for that matter). He's still a question mark, but I think he has the look of the real deal. He might be this generation's next Thielen. Now, let's talk about Tet. High first round draft pick, first true WR off the board this year. Stellar career out west in college. Has the swagger of the WR1. And man, y'all are going to get mad about this but... he comes across as a mook. And in the pre-season he performed, well, not so great against poor opposition of second and third stringers. Yeah, he caught that one moonshot ball in the first game but really, nothing else lighting the place up. Rookie endzone drop in that game, too. He's still young and adjusting, I'm sure, but I was hoping to see something of a breakthrough kind of guy. I'm still looking. Hunter Renfro? Gosh, I hope he can make the team and make a comeback to his old form. It would be such a great story. But maybe neither one of those happens. We won't know until Tuesday and then, if he makes it past there it could be weeks. So, TL;DR: AT is all we can bank on right now. We couldn't afford to let him go considering the number of unknowns we'd be throwing out there for our QB, who himself is still an unknown. One thing to add: Our receivers coaching group has their work cut out for them. I hope they are up to the task, but the pre-season gave me little reason to believe in them. And I really need something to believe in here in Carolina.  
    • Same I think Randsom is a baller..... hopefully we don't have to suffer through 4-8 games of Scott blowing azz to get him on the feild.
    • Linebacker is the biggest need - I hope we figure out a way to address it. Krys Barnes is the only one who even moderately flashed.  Super nervous about Trevin/Rozeboom as a duo (Still like Trevin) I'd be excited if we had a better vet to mentor Trevin.  Or a better younger guy to support Rozeboom.  They just don't fit well and it may be a big problem against the run, even with our DL much improved. 
×
×
  • Create New...