Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Dee Ford - Possible Hardy Replacement (If We Lose Hardy)?


Proudiddy

Recommended Posts

I can't claim to be a college football expert by any stretch of the imagination...  I just generally don't care until the season gets down to the homestretch, so, some of you will be much more informed on some of these guys than I am. 

 

What is the general perception of Ford?

 

I know he killed it at the Senior Bowl, which is where I first noticed him.  So, I looked up his draft projections, stats, etc., and he is 6'2", 243 lbs., and listed as a DE.  I find it highly unlikely that he plays DE as a rookie if he is coming in at 243 lbs.  It's possible, but not likely. 

 

So, does anyone think he remains a DE coming into the league?  Furthermore, any sources out there that thinks he can bulk up anymore? 

 

One thing is for sure, he is explosive, and I don't see that changing.  But, I just don't see him playing on the line being that light.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Like some has mentioned, we should trade Hardy to Oakland for a 2nd round pick.  

 

There are 5 solid DE's in this draft (Clowney, Murphy, Ford, Jeffcoat, & Crichton).  There is no doubt we need to take a WR & OT with our first two picks, but with our late 2nd round pick, it would be wise to take a DE ( best available).  CB's are deep this year.  We can take one with our 3rd rd pick.  Most likely available (Victor Hampton, Chris Davis, Pierre Desir,  Jaylen Watkins, EJ Gaines, etc....plenty of talent.)  Also, don't forget that Aaron Colvin who is a solid CB tore is ACL and now is a late 6th or 7th round pick.  Another guy we jump on later.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think I saw Josh Norris say that Ford's first couple seasons will be in the role sort of like how we have Addison right now, pure pass rusher from the edge since he lacks the bulk and strength to play the run, and I'm not sure how much more weight he can add without taking away from his speed.  He has good bend and hand use to get around Tackles, but needs to add more moves other than a speed rush to continue to excel as a rusher.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think that he can play DE but Im not going to take a chance with him. Dont want him being the next Everette Brown.

For the guys that want a DE, Im telling you guys, go check out "MARCUS SMITH" (14.5 sacks). The former QB turned DE is a stud who could be have in the 2nd.

What school did he attend?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can't claim to be a college football expert by any stretch of the imagination...  I just generally don't care until the season gets down to the homestretch, so, some of you will be much more informed on some of these guys than I am. 

 

What is the general perception of Ford?

 

I know he killed it at the Senior Bowl, which is where I first noticed him.  So, I looked up his draft projections, stats, etc., and he is 6'2", 243 lbs., and listed as a DE.  I find it highly unlikely that he plays DE as a rookie if he is coming in at 243 lbs.  It's possible, but not likely. 

 

So, does anyone think he remains a DE coming into the league?  Furthermore, any sources out there that thinks he can bulk up anymore? 

 

One thing is for sure, he is explosive, and I don't see that changing.  But, I just don't see him playing on the line being that light.

 

 

 

The answer is already on the roster ............Horton, Addission would probably be the starter knowing the system and having experience & size to play DE.   I rather spend the pick on a needed position.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think that he can play DE but Im not going to take a chance with him. Dont want him being the next Everette Brown.

For the guys that want a DE, Im telling you guys, go check out "MARCUS SMITH" (14.5 sacks). The former QB turned DE is a stud who could be have in the 2nd.

Are you sure about that?  I looked him up and all I could find was him having 9.5 career sacks., not 14.5. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I mean, but there is ample evidence that exists currently in the NFL and historically that if you have a talented or moderately talented team then one of the biggest upgrades you can make is at QB. It yields the biggest returns. I don't think even Prime Greg Olsen is going to make Bryce suddenly look like a stud QB. We have invested immense amounts of money on the OL and tremendous amounts of draft resources on WR's. And have added an additional extremely capable RB. At some point, the main problem is Bryce. We are at that point.  That being said, we don't need to go "Full Bryce" again and sell the farm to upgrade at QB. Be intelligent and patient. Try to get better by whatever means become available WHILE continuing to make the roster better. At the bare minimum, you slowly build an upper half of the NFL talented roster that is at least a potential draw for some free agent QB's. IMO, Bryce is clearly not the answer. I don't think anyone in our organization thinks that way but if they do, it's not the end of the world. Throw as many reasonable darts as you can through free agency and the draft until either you get a bullseye or a top 10-15 option becomes available in free agency.
    • I think the best way to make Bryce better is to make everyone around him better.  This is why I advocate for a stud (top 5, eventually) TE.  I mean, when we have been a good franchise, we have had a stud TE (Walls, Olsen) and ILB (Beason, Mills, Morgan, Luke, etc) so it is in our DNA.  Expect us to address these areas this year.  (An Olsen or Walls would help Bryce a lot).  In terms of productivity, I think we are going to work with XL for one more season and ride the TMac / Coker momentum.  Where else could we find a position to improve productivity?  TE.  A position that caters to Bryce's style and shortcomings, a stud TE gives him another weapon he has not had. The Panthers run a lot of 2-TE sets (I have seen 3) and they have a blocker (Tremble) who is great in the run game, a balanced TE (Evans), and Sanders is supposed to be the pass-catching TE. He had 340 yards last season and he has about 170 this year.  If we are going to play around with XL for another season, it only makes up to add to Bryce's weapons in a way that does not put XL on the bench, basically ending his development. It makes sense to bring in a pass-catching dawg.  The way the offense is designed, I see carrying 4, but its not ideal. Having said that, I mentioned Oregon's Sadiq in another thread, but I am starting to warm up to Vanderbilt's Stowers and, in the Olsen/Walls mold, I kinda like Endries from Texas.  Of course, Stowers is probably going in round 2 and Endries in 3 or later. I still say, 5 months before the draft, that I would not be surprised if we take a TE very early.
×
×
  • Create New...