Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Dee Ford - Possible Hardy Replacement (If We Lose Hardy)?


Proudiddy

Recommended Posts

I can't claim to be a college football expert by any stretch of the imagination...  I just generally don't care until the season gets down to the homestretch, so, some of you will be much more informed on some of these guys than I am. 

 

What is the general perception of Ford?

 

I know he killed it at the Senior Bowl, which is where I first noticed him.  So, I looked up his draft projections, stats, etc., and he is 6'2", 243 lbs., and listed as a DE.  I find it highly unlikely that he plays DE as a rookie if he is coming in at 243 lbs.  It's possible, but not likely. 

 

So, does anyone think he remains a DE coming into the league?  Furthermore, any sources out there that thinks he can bulk up anymore? 

 

One thing is for sure, he is explosive, and I don't see that changing.  But, I just don't see him playing on the line being that light.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Like some has mentioned, we should trade Hardy to Oakland for a 2nd round pick.  

 

There are 5 solid DE's in this draft (Clowney, Murphy, Ford, Jeffcoat, & Crichton).  There is no doubt we need to take a WR & OT with our first two picks, but with our late 2nd round pick, it would be wise to take a DE ( best available).  CB's are deep this year.  We can take one with our 3rd rd pick.  Most likely available (Victor Hampton, Chris Davis, Pierre Desir,  Jaylen Watkins, EJ Gaines, etc....plenty of talent.)  Also, don't forget that Aaron Colvin who is a solid CB tore is ACL and now is a late 6th or 7th round pick.  Another guy we jump on later.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think I saw Josh Norris say that Ford's first couple seasons will be in the role sort of like how we have Addison right now, pure pass rusher from the edge since he lacks the bulk and strength to play the run, and I'm not sure how much more weight he can add without taking away from his speed.  He has good bend and hand use to get around Tackles, but needs to add more moves other than a speed rush to continue to excel as a rusher.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think that he can play DE but Im not going to take a chance with him. Dont want him being the next Everette Brown.

For the guys that want a DE, Im telling you guys, go check out "MARCUS SMITH" (14.5 sacks). The former QB turned DE is a stud who could be have in the 2nd.

What school did he attend?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can't claim to be a college football expert by any stretch of the imagination...  I just generally don't care until the season gets down to the homestretch, so, some of you will be much more informed on some of these guys than I am. 

 

What is the general perception of Ford?

 

I know he killed it at the Senior Bowl, which is where I first noticed him.  So, I looked up his draft projections, stats, etc., and he is 6'2", 243 lbs., and listed as a DE.  I find it highly unlikely that he plays DE as a rookie if he is coming in at 243 lbs.  It's possible, but not likely. 

 

So, does anyone think he remains a DE coming into the league?  Furthermore, any sources out there that thinks he can bulk up anymore? 

 

One thing is for sure, he is explosive, and I don't see that changing.  But, I just don't see him playing on the line being that light.

 

 

 

The answer is already on the roster ............Horton, Addission would probably be the starter knowing the system and having experience & size to play DE.   I rather spend the pick on a needed position.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think that he can play DE but Im not going to take a chance with him. Dont want him being the next Everette Brown.

For the guys that want a DE, Im telling you guys, go check out "MARCUS SMITH" (14.5 sacks). The former QB turned DE is a stud who could be have in the 2nd.

Are you sure about that?  I looked him up and all I could find was him having 9.5 career sacks., not 14.5. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I do think the rating is fair given how this unit hasn’t proven it with production. I understand you have to rank off production, not potential. However, our unit is also in a position to make this rating look foolish a year from now. We have 4 guys in the WR/TE room who all could legitimately take the next step this year, and catapult our rank. A guy under a lot of people’s radar after we took Tet, Jalen Coker. Mark my words, he will become the star of this room, and be the heir to Thielen.
    • Exactly. You’d think 2-7 wins a year (in a 17 game season no less) since 2017 is going to keep us bottom tier. Every year we say the same poo like we haven’t been a bad team the past 7 years. Until we prove we aren’t a bottom dweller, that’s where we’ll stay ranked. God forbid we have OL injuries like 2016.
    • What I love and hate about this team is it’s more filled with potential breakout players than ever before. JT, XL, Coker, Smith-Wade, Ikem, Trevin… and even Bryce are all guys I could legitimately see taking the next step. But the problem with having so many of those guys is that team success somewhat relies on them taking that step, and some are bound not to. That being said, I’m cautiously optimistic given our softer schedule, the way the offense clicked late last year, and the direction we finally have at GM, coach, and QB. Could see us as a sneaky playoff team.
×
×
  • Create New...