Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Kiper believes we'll draft the next Steve Smith: Cooks


top dawg

Recommended Posts

If you think watching Mel kipper keeps me interested in who my favorite team should or should not draft...dude.

Has any NFL team wee paid Kiper to scout for them? Kiper is obsessed with his job, but you are asking that I be grateful to him or give him credit for the televising of a draft and scouting that would surely go on with or without his insight and mouth...give me a break.

ESPN is there because of the sport, not the other way around...and they didn't even bring revenue to the sport until they started televising games. I hate it when people try to shovel bs down my throat and tell me it's brownie mix...don't fall for it..please...just...stop

 

Whatever attitude you want to have about Mel Kiper is your right.  I don't honestly care.  He's definitely not my favorite draft analyst (best ever was Joel Buchsbaum, but he died back in the 80s).  So no, I'd not say you should watch because of him.

 

But back when I started watching the Draft, Kiper was the only guy doing what he was doing on TV.  So yes, that makes him a legitimate pioneer in draft analysis and coverage. 

 

Whether you choose to have any feelings about that is entirely up to you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In all due fairness, I do hear what you are saying...not to discredit you or the job he does.

Do I think he should be in the HoF, definitely not for being a pioneer. He's a product of the televisation (new word that I won't get credit in Webster's for coming up with just now,) and popularity of the players who actually play the game.

If he did it without pay or decided not to spend half of that paycheck on his hair, I'd give him more credence.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In all due fairness, I do hear what you are saying...not to discredit you or the job he does.

Do I think he should be in the HoF, definitely not for being a pioneer. He's a product of the televisation (new word that I won't get credit in Webster's for coming up with just now,) and popularity of the players who actually play the game.

If he did it without pay or decided not to spend half of that paycheck on his hair, I'd give him more credence.

 

I actually said above that I think a Hall of Fame induction would be a bit much.  I could see him being part of a display in the Hall of Fame that talks about the history of draft analysis.  That'd be fair.

 

Heck, they may already have something like that.  My only visit to the Hall of Fame was in 1995 (when the Panthers played the Jags).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My biggest beef with Kiper, McShay, and the other "draft experts" is how they speak in certainties.  So and so is a perennial Pro Bowler, and if you draft so and so you have your entrenched starter at *insert position* for the next decade, etc.

 

I highly doubt actual scouts and front office personnel speak in those terms.  I think they understand that everyone in the draft is a prospect.  Some prospects are better than others and every draft will have busts and steals.  They just have to put in their work to try to make sure they avoid the busts and try to find the steals.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm pretty sure one of the criteria of the NFL is that you have to have once been employed as an NFL employee.

Otherwise, things could get out of hand.

There should be a subsection for the "Super Fans,"...and maybe Mel would satisfy that criteria.

Imagine,..mini-busts for the Panther-Gnome, The Redskin's Indian... "Whooooom-whoooom, the diesel's coming." The 'aints crossdresser, the raider's road warriors. That would be...awesome!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My biggest beef with Kiper, McShay, and the other "draft experts" is how they speak in certainties.  So and so is a perennial Pro Bowler, and if you draft so and so you have your entrenched starter at *insert position* for the next decade, etc.

 

I highly doubt actual scouts and front office personnel speak in those terms.  I think they understand that everyone in the draft is a prospect.  Some prospects are better than others and every draft will have busts and steals.  They just have to put in their work to try to make sure they avoid the busts and try to find the steals.

 

To be fair, isn't that most of (what passes for) sports journalism these days?

 

Actual reasoned analysis takes a back seat to big bombastic predictions from nimrods like Jim Rome.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm pretty sure one of the criteria of the NFL is that you have to have once been employed as an NFL employee.

Otherwise, things could get out of hand.

There should be a subsection for the "Super Fans,"...and maybe Mel would satisfy that criteria.

Imagine,..mini-busts for the Panther-Gnome, The Redskin's Indian... "Whooooom-whoooom, the diesel's coming." The 'aints crossdresser, the raider's road warriors. That would be...awesome!

 

I don't think Alice or Big A or Big Ass or whatever he's calling himself these days should be featured in any exhibit.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Kiper has a great gig, no doubt. I just wish I had a say about who's hype I had to endure during one of my favorite non-sporting "sport" events. The bad thing, is that even if I attended the draft, I'd still have to endure Mel's mouth as he is mic'd over the loudspeakers.

Maybe I'm hating, but he just thrashes the teams and their picks more times than not, for guys they will be paying...right in front of everyone's faces. It's beyond infuriating and against everything that the draft really celebrates, which is the admission of young men into the NFL.

I will never credit Mel kiper for me being able to scout players or for being able to watch the draft on live television. He's simply a product of the process, no a pioneer. How many scouts get no credit at a tiny percentage of his salary? How they must feel about Mel and the doubtless millions of people who put him on a pedestal...I really have to find their opinions of him in print to put this in true perspective.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Kiper has a great gig, no doubt. I just wish I had a say about who's hype I had to endure during one of my favorite non-sporting "sport" events. The bad thing, is that even if I attended the draft, I'd still have to endure Mel's mouth as he is mic'd over the loudspeakers.

Maybe I'm hating, but he just thrashes the teams and their picks more times than not, for guys they will be paying...right in front of everyone's faces. It's beyond infuriating and against everything that the draft really celebrates, which is the admission of young men into the NFL.

I will never credit Mel kiper for me being able to scout players or for being able to watch the draft on live television. He's simply a product of the process, no a pioneer. How many scouts get no credit at a tiny percentage of his salary? How they must feel about Mel and the doubtless millions of people who put him on a pedestal...I really have to find their opinions of him in print to put this in true perspective.

 

Joel Buchsbaum actually did have offers from NFL teams to join their scouting staff, but he turned them down.  And he was a little too private a person to be a TV personality (didn't exactly have a face for TV either).

 

ESPN did some of its best draft analysis in recent years when they had Floyd Reese working for them.  These days it's bill Polian, who I'm not as big a fan of, but I think it's great that they have guys who used to actually do the job talking about it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Polian...the guy who ran the the Panthers into the dirt drafting players like Kerry Collins and Rae Carruth, or the Polian that gets all the credit for no-brainers Peyton Manning and Edgerrin James?

Oh my gosh...smh

 

Polian built his rep with the Bills and the drafting of Peyton Manning (whom he failed to properly build around).  There was also early success in Carolina, but it didn't take long to break down.

 

To me, he'll always be the guy who picked Kerry Collins over Steve McNair and Tshimanga Biakabutuka over Eddie George.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • No. Physical tools alone aren't enough. There are plenty of examples of draft busts to support that. Aost all of them had the physical tools and that wasn't enough. But Bryce is a perfect example of the opposite. Absolutely elite intangibles aren't enough either. If you simply don't have the physical abilities all the football intelligence and work ethic in the world won't be enough to overcome it. Just look to the sidelines every Sunday. We call those people "coaches".
    • As much as I despise Billy B, his philosophy on QBs is how I would approach things if I were a GM. You always keep looking for your next starter.  He has Bledsoe, who got injured and his backup ended up being the GOAT. Even while he had that going, he kept getting his next guy and developing them. When Brady got hurt, Cassel stepped in and went 11-5 and they missed the wild card by dumb luck. Who knows how far they would have gone if they had gotten in. Jimmy Gs career started in NE. There were others, but he always kept looking.  You can't be afraid to keep looking for your next starter, but it looks like we're afraid to look for more than a marginal one. If you're going to offer a $25m contract with incentives, that screams marginal QB. It also screams you're just a transition until we find our guy. After a 10 or 11 win season, he's not accepting that offer. And then you're in a Daniel Jones situation. Do you pay for a year of success and pray it wasn't a one year wonder?  To this point, Bryce has really produced nothing, yet for whatever reason, our FO has not even sniffed at the idea that we need a real QB room with real QBs. Dalton was never starter potential, Plummer was a joke. KP certainly isn't, neither is Grier.  Our approach to the QB room needs to be one of strength not fear. Bring in guys who can compete or who you think can compete. This is THE elite position, in an elite sport, paid premium salary, where production matters. Either you produce or you can lose your job. It's not mean, it's just the reality of the position.  And I'm really just tired of our candy ass approach to it. 
    • If you plug Bryce onto the Pro Bowl roster you might have a chance to compete for a SB. If he's surrounded by top tier talent with a top tier defense on the other side, a field flipping punter, and a kicker good from 60+ you might have a chance. But that means you basically have to recreate Saban's Bama in the NFL and that's impossible... and Bryce couldn't win a championship in that environment either. What the Panthers didn't realize when they got so obsessed with his "PG mentality" was that what they were looking st was a "barely checks the box PG". The basketball equivalent of Bryce would be an undersized PG with marginal athleticism who can make the basic plays but adds nothing to the team in terms of elevating the overall team. Not a great shooter, not a great defender, not a great driver. Just a guy who can basically get you into the offense and be a matador on defense. Basically a placeholder while you look to upgrade the PG position. 
×
×
  • Create New...