Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Newton tied with Brees


stirs

Recommended Posts

I don't agree with that at all. ESPN is a complete joke. Newton's a top 10 QB, but not quite top 5. He'll get there, especially when he gets some weapons, but he's just not there yet.

 

Bears GM was the one who made the list.

ESPN guy reporting it

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All these quarterback rankings are just opinions anyway, everyone has a different view. I don't care where he's ranked, I just want to win.

 

The comments are entertaining as usual though.

 

20qf82a.gif

 

that is possibly the most accurate, non fan evaluation of cam I have ever read... I mean I love me some Cam but I completely agree with this dude. 

 

*Edit* I skipped the first line of this dude's comment when I wrote what I said above. I'm not going to be a douchenozzle and delete what I wrote, but I backtrack on this comment on Page 2. I don't hate cam, he reads defenses like a third year QB should, I was talking about the rest of what he said.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

that is possibly the most accurate, non fan evaluation of cam I have ever read... I mean I love me some Cam but I completely agree with this dude. 

 

He's not good at reading defenses? How is this accurate? I would like you to explain unless you are just an idiot. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Then you clearly missed this past season where Cam was one of the most efficient QBs on third down.

Can't read a defense? Yeah, sorry. He's not Kaeperdick.

Cracka McNasty was pretty vocal here against drafting Newton anyway, I'm totally shocked he shares that guys opinion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • He’s kind of overrated to be honest. Never really felt like a true #1 or elevated his play to become a guy the defense really has to worry about. 
    • I'm going to be real, the reason that vote ended up so lop-sided by the end was directly due to my programming. So there's nothing tongue in cheek about it. Also I left PFF after the Collinsworth acquisition (didn't want to move to Cincy) but have stayed involved in analytics via backdoor channels, but I can absolutely say that the experience was eye-opening, not because those guys are unquestionable football savants and that I became one by proxy, but because the amount of information that becomes available outside of what the typical fan has access to is revelatory and also really drives home how much context is still being missed even with all of that information. You don't discover that you know everything, you discover how much you still can't know no matter how hard you try, hence my point about the NFL not being able to figure out what makes a QB good. There's a lot of AI work going into that now and even that only seems to further confuse things vs. actually enlighten the problem. In the professional realm teams don't really talk about quarterbacks as A strictly being better than B, but how A can potentially perform better than B given a specific context of C. Of course those contexts may be wider for A than B, but there's also contexts where B can outshine A, even with lesser talent surrounding them. So what good teams strive to do is ultimately define a process of how they want their entire team to operate under schematically, find players that fit that scheme, and hopefully find a guy whose skillset will be maximized running that scheme with those players. Where bad teams fall of the wagon is constantly shifting those schemes and chasing bad fits or fads vs. sticking with a core identity and developing it.
    • there is a 100 mile long list of NFL players and coaches going to bat and defending horrible play from teammates.   
×
×
  • Create New...