Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Bobcats Trade Deadline Thread


Proudiddy

Recommended Posts

Brian Windhorst of ESPN now "reaffirming" that Bobcats are one of two teams trying to trade for Pau Gasol. The other being the Suns.

*facepalm*

What are we trying to do??? Young? Old? Take on more salary? Create salary cap room?? We just seem all over the place.

 

I really hope Clifford has some input on a trade. 

 

He has been around enough to know who can play and who cant, and how someone fits for him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gasol is 33 and getting hurt on and off now, WTF?

 

Josh Smith I may be ok on, there is no guarantee that if we have a ton of cap space that we could sign someone like Stephenson so I go back and forth on my feelings about that.

 

But the Caron Butler, Gasol stuff I don't know.  I wouldn't trade away assets for guys that age.  Also, we really need a consistent shooting guard.

 

I can see looking to upgrade PF, but all the SF talk I'm not sure that is where the focus should be, SG or PF in my opinion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've said it before that I would love Paul Gasol. Even though, Gasol is a bit older he's still playing at a high level. He still got a good 2-3 years left. A front court of Gasol and Jefferson would be hard for any team to defend in the Playoffs. That's the best shot of us beating the Pacers or Heat.

 

 

Im just confused, probably more pissed by what the Front Office is doing. They're all over the place. We've been linked to like a dozen names already. Make me feel like they're just trying to make a move to sell more tickets (fans) than actually trying to win. I'm sick of this crap.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I pretty much dont want any of the guys we've been linked to. The Butler/Neal thing made sense to me because we wouldn't lose a first rounder and wouldn't need to commit much money.

I just hope Cho walks up in the office and starts bitch slapping some idiots and making some calls.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gasol isn't worth a first round pick like LA is asking. I wouldn't take Gasol from them with out getting their first back. Unprotected first at that.

 

The MOST I would give would be Ben Gordon and Ports 1st. 

 

Still probably wouldn't. 

 

Ben Gordon and Sessions for Gasol and Steve Blake might would work.  

 

Its valuable to them because it frees them up a lot of cap space for the summer. 

 

Still don't want to send any picks. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The MOST I would give would be Ben Gordon and Ports 1st.

Still probably wouldn't.

Ben Gordon and Sessions for Gasol and Steve Blake might would work.

Its valuable to them because it frees them up a lot of cap space for the summer.

Still don't want to send any picks.

I wouldn't send the Portland pick or a second rounder in 2929. The only way I would take Gasol and his contract is he was packaged with their 2014 first round pick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yeah, Darnold is basically a really high level game manager. Put him on a good team where he isn't required to provide lift and he can shine. But when you need him to do the franchise QB thing and put the team in his back here comes the INTs. He just doesn't seem to have any positions on his dial between "super conservative take whatever's there and take care of the ball" and "YOLO!!! There's a receiver down there somewhere in that sea of defenders!"
    • See, it's posts like this that show me how many of you are taking my post as an anti Dowdle post and saying he didn't have a good game, but that's the furthest thing from my intention and what I'm trying to say. Because that's the comparison you're making with Bryce, it's adding or removing a small handful of plays from their stats and saying "this is the game they could have had instead" I'm literally only talking about the play calling from the game, it's literally in the title of the thread, that we still have play calling problems. I'm saying that people are going to get stuck on the 200 yard rushing game by a player and extrapolate that to "well Canales must have called a good game" and I'm trying to say not to fall for that mirage. Because 6 big runs do not make for a well called game when we had over 60 snaps. Even beyond that, if you add in the two 20+ yard catches from T-Mac and the one XL had, and you're looking at 9 of over 60 snaps that accounted for close to 60% of our yards in the game. That's a few big plays covering up for coaching deficiencies, that's NOT a well called 60 minutes of football. Had he had the 200 yards because Canales' play calling was keeping the defense on their heels, not knowing what we were doing next, and Dowdle was ripping of 8-12 yard runs on a consistent basis, then yea, that would be something to be excited about with Canales finally calling a good game for a change. Our offense is predictable and the play design is basic, there is nothing I've seen out of Canales' offense that says he's able to scheme and call plays to outsmart the defense, which is something all the elite offensive coaches are able to do in this day and age.
    • Dante Moore is the top pick in a couple of mock drafts now. 
×
×
  • Create New...