Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers Interested In Eric Decker and Hakeem Nicks


carolina-chuck

Recommended Posts

What does me having a 9 yo son have to do with posting on here?

And, maybe if you look in that sandy vag of yours, you will find that fug that has been missing.

Carry on.

you do realize that you've been sitting here having a full on convo w/ someone you claim not to be able to understand right? How baffling...if you or anyone else on here thinks I'm gonna got out of my way to try & impress w/ my grammar in a forum of all places then you have sadly mistaken. I'm just saying you'd be better off focusing on something more important like your kids because you're jus not gonna get anywhere w/ me. Period. & at this point im convinced that f*ck just doesn't exist. Sorry *shrugs*
Link to comment
Share on other sites

you do realize that you've been sitting here having a full on convo w/ someone you claim not to be able to understand right? How baffling...if you or anyone else on here thinks I'm gonna got out of my way to try & impress w/ my grammar in a forum of all places then you have sadly mistaken. I'm just saying you'd be better off focusing on something more important like your kids because you're jus not gonna get anywhere w/ me. Period. & at this point im convinced that f*ck just doesn't exist. Sorry *shrugs*

 

Illiterat AND stubborn....such an attractive combination.

 

Did you check that sandy vag of yours for the fug...I am betting that it has been lost in there (undisturbed) for years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

no need to compare any stats from 2012 when the article claesrly stated his stats in general were down from the 1st two yrs lol. It also stated why & IMO u can try to argue against it all day but u can pretty much conclude that if Chud had still been our coordinator last season & Cam had been as a bit more consistent EVERYBODIES #s would have looked better on offense. If he's still here this season (which he will be), idt anyone will be expecting nor wanting him to still be our #1 & thats not my point. my point is that cutting him would be an even bigger mistaken trying that out again even when we bring in someone new. Now is not the time to be making those types of changes. I'm not sure it would make Cam or the person that would have to come in & have the pressure on them to replace him, happy to not have him there to play alongside showing them the ropes for at least one more yr. Ecsp since financially the benefit is almost non existent @ the the new guy wouldn't necessarily be sure to have an immediate impact

 

Ok, so you don't want us to cut Smith. That's great. I want him here, too. You just don't want him to be our #1. Guess what? Neither do I! What is it that we disagree on? Whether or not Smitty's skills have declined? He's old in football years. Age will eventually take its toll on everyone. That's in no way an indictment of Smitty; it's just a fact of life.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Illiterat AND stubborn....such an attractive combination.

Did you check that sandy vag of yours for the fug...I am betting that it has been lost in there (undisturbed) for years.

has your son even eaten breakfast yet? I doubt it...& yet here you are. Continue to enjoy arguing w/ yourself you hopeless old lady.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ok, so you don't want us to cut Smith. That's great. I want him here, too. You just don't want him to be our #1. Guess what? Neither do I! What is it that we disagree on? Whether or not Smitty's skills have declined? He's old in football years. Age will eventually take its toll on everyone. That's in no way an indictment of Smitty; it's just a fact of life.

well there you have it...
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not so simple, you can't expect him to take a pay cut and still be the teams #1 wr. If he's taking a paycut it needs to be because he's moving to the slot.

Not necessarily, calvin johnsin and nate washington don't get paid the same thing for being starters. Production has more to do with it than position. That said, Smitty may feel that he's already earned that money and refuse to leave it on the table.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

has your son even eaten breakfast yet? I doubt it...& yet here you are. Continue to enjoy arguing w/ yourself you hopeless old lady.

It doesn't take long to fix a kid breakfast.

He's 9, it's Monday, so his kid is probably at school.

At the time of that post it was 11:30, closer o lunch than breakfast.

His kid is completely irrelevant to anything in this thread outside of your poor attempt to deflect attention from your 9 year old English skills and stunning combo or laziness and apathy.

Like most, you'll be gone soon enough anyway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

has your son even eaten breakfast yet? I doubt it...& yet here you are. Continue to enjoy arguing w/ yourself you hopeless old lady.

 

Fixed my son a great breakfast of pancakes and bacon before he left for school....as I did for my other two kids.  I am up bright and early to ensure that their day starts off right....maybe that is why all of my kids are straight A students.

 

If you are going to try and throw out humor and insults, at least give it some effort.

 

Try again you little twit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not so simple, you can't expect him to take a pay cut and still be the teams #1 wr. If he's taking a paycut it needs to be because he's moving to the slot.

 

There isn't a correlation between which receiving position you play and whether you are considered the #1 or highest paid receiver.  

 

You will find that the best and highest paid receivers on a given team can be at any of the positions...z, x, or y. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I don't think it was fear of the unknown because he tried to hide the extent of the injuries that made him drop. After the drop, the reports I heard were that teams knew what was wrong with his knee and it was something similar to another athlete from a few years ago (honestly don't remember if it was even a football player).  That it was basically one of those things where he should be fine for a while, there isn't a huge concern of immediate injury risk.   But what he has going on with his knee is something that is degenerative and there's little chance he'll be able to play more than 5 or so years on it before he won't be able to play anymore. So basically it was teams knowing if they draft him, he's probably going to be only a rookie contract player and even if he's great, you might not be able to get use out of him on a second contract.  Which in turn makes the drop make sense, but I'm kinda surprised some contending team didn't take him late in the 1st, hoping he'd put them over the top on a SB run but then not even have to worry about giving him a big contract in 4 years too.
    • Depends if they see the writing on the wall with their roster and contracts and decide to bite the bullet and begin a complete rebuild and roster overhaul.  I have no clue why some franchises (IE us) refuse to do this and keep half assing trying to win 8 games or so.  Do it correctly, take your lumps and build a contender.  We shall see what loomis decides.
    • Each team plays 17 games.  I do not see why they don't just have each team play one international game per year.  Neutral site game, 8 home, 8 away.    
×
×
  • Create New...