Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Hybrid Wildcat?


Jakob

Recommended Posts

Hybrid Wildcat? Well how would that work? Well as you all know we have a big tall quarterback that can run like the wind, by the name of Cam Newton. Imagine if we had another big tall quarterback that could run even faster AND catch the ball? We do, his name is Joe Webb. 

 

 

Imagine the look on the face of the opposing defense if we came out with a two QB wildcat package. Hate it or love it I think it would be hilarious. Put Tolbert out there too and you wouldn't know what's about to happen.

 

the possibilities are endless!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is a terrible idea.

 

edit: To expand, we saw last year that the wildcat for us was a mediocre running play at best, esp. in the 2nd half of the season.  While Webb may find his way onto the field, I am never in favor of taking the ball completely out of Cam's hands and using him as a distraction. He is our biggest playmaker.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You know, It's really a mystery as to why we signed Webb, it would have made sense if we had of let Anderson walk. if we needed a QB for OTA's we could of just signed a practice squad scrub.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mike Shula.

That's whole pie worthy bruh.

I don't see us keeping 3 QBs, but I love that he's so versatile. Just can't see them dressing 3 QBs on game day, but of course he could dress as a WR and be the emergency QB.

At the same time, we had a hybrid before (Armanti Edwards) with a much more creative o-coordinator by the name of Chudzinski, and he was never used at all.

As Mr Red said, two words, one name

Mike Shula

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You know, It's really a mystery as to why we signed Webb, it would have made sense if we had of let Anderson walk. if we needed a QB for OTA's we could of just signed a practice squad scrub.

You need some one with real talent not just a scrub to take some of the reps Cam will miss.

Plus we need to find a backup QB for the future bc we are bound and determine to get Cam hurt

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Why do you say that. What leads you to think that we, as supporters, think his ceiling is 10-12. That's a ridiculous assumption on your part. The Seahawks won the SB with Darnold passing for 25 TD's, 14 Ints with a 99.1 rating for the season.  The Panthers with Young were at 23 TD's, 11 Ints and a 78.8 rating for the season. Not that far off. The problem with all the Young discourse around here is the assumption that the QB is the sole determining factor for a teams success. That just isn't true and it's certainly not how Morgan and Tilis are building the Panthers. 
    • Do we pay based on how many wins or how many games Bryce led us to wins? We've spent quite a bit on defense this year and hopefully they're much improved. If the Panthers do get to 10 wins, but Bryce has another year like last year where he showed up big in a couple, was present in a few, and forgettable in most, do we still pay him 50m per year?  I keep bringing it up because I think it's relevant, but Bryce was outplayed by a 6m per year backup last year. I don't see how it's possible to pay a top tier QB contract to someone who's putting up backup QB production. 
    • I understand tempering expectations, but there are some issues with his points. Walker was a 3 year starter, but Green Bay let him walk and no other team was quick to snatch him up. That says something. Freeling will compete to start. With Hunter, we rotate our linemen and even 5th round pick Cam Jackson played some meaningful snaps last year. Both Brown III and Wharton have underwhelmed since we picked them up. Hunter is a run plugger that we have needed. Hunter will play early, even if he isn't the "starter." Brazzell was described as one of Canales' favorite prospects in the draft and he has a speed element we have been missing. I think Canales is going to have plays drawn up with Brazzell on the field just out of pure excitement. It will be up to Brazzell to prove he can handle it, though. If he can, he will play. As far as our secondary picks, yeah they have to earn their stripes and Evero tends to lean on veterans. So they might take time, but if they can show they can play, they will see the field. Smith-Wade and Ransom did. Sam Hecht simply has to show he can handle the mental side of the NFL game. If he can, he is in a direct competition with Fortner, who's also relatively young, but also on his 3rd NFL team and doesn't have the power profile of Hecht.  I can appreciate that Gantt wants to pour cold water on what was perceived as an impactful draft, but facts are facts.
×
×
  • Create New...