Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

D-Will in shock over loss of receiving corp


nctarheel0619

Recommended Posts

That's not his point, his point is that Dwill couldn't break a tackle if his life depended on it so it wouldn't be smart to give him the ball at the goal line..meanwhile, Marshawn lynch....

He's not a power runner but neither is Lesean Mccoy. Thats where scheme comes in. Its not his fault we are trying to run a power run scheme with a guy who needs space. That makes him overpaid on our team, that doesn't mean he sucks. We aren't using him effectively. Thats on the team not him. If you watch AP by the way he is the king of negative yards before he breaks one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

tiquan underwood yards per reception: 18.3

calvin johnson yards per reception: 17.8

 

sorry lions fans but i think the numbers clearly show who is better

WR's must get open to get more catches, major difference dumb ass. You don't simply hand the ball off to them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

but i thought you said numbers never lie?

They don't if you say that Tiquan averages more yards per catch than Calvin Johnson-FACT, does that make him better? Nope. You would have to be a dumb ass to actually believe that you can compare a wrs ypc, and a rbs avg ypc. Lots of different factors that determine how many catches a wr get. So you can't take a wr ypc and project it to yardage.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You must have missed the "clutch" part...

 

Dwill has great hands until the game is on the line and we really need him to hold on to it...

 

We should totally judge DeAngelo by one game instead of his whole career. Sounds fair to me! Let's judge Cam by his four-pick Arizona game, or judge Luke Kuechly by the Buffalo game, or judge Graham Gano by that extra point he missed once, or judge Mike Tolbert by failing to get across the goal line in the SF game, or judge...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They don't if you say that Tiquan averages more yards per catch than Calvin Johnson-FACT, does that make him better? Nope. You would have to be a dumb ass to actually believe that you can compare a wrs ypc, and a rbs avg ypc. Lots of different factors that determine how many catches a wr get. So you can't take a wr ypc and project it to yardage.

 

so numbers do lie then?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

WR's must get open to get more catches, major difference dumb ass. You don't simply hand the ball off to them.

 

it's to illustrate the folly of your argument ya silly goose

 

i'll humor you though.  i just googled the first marginal flash in the pan running back i could think of (jerious norwood) and his career ypc is almost a yard higher than that of either lynch or williams. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

wow this is turning out to be more fun than i expected

 

mike goodson: 4.7 ypc/career

 

e: that stat was a bit out of context and i'd like to apologize as it's on the wrong scale for what was posted about lynch/williams.  goodson's 2013 ypc was actually 8.7 which makes him twice as good as lynch or williams.  sorry for the confusion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They don't if you say that Tiquan averages more yards per catch than Calvin Johnson-FACT, does that make him better? Nope. You would have to be a dumb ass to actually believe that you can compare a wrs ypc, and a rbs avg ypc. Lots of different factors that determine how many catches a wr get. So you can't take a wr ypc and project it to yardage.

You want Running back ypc?

Donald brown 5.3 ypc

LeGarette Blount 5.0 ypc

Andre Elllington 5.5 ypc

Are all better than....

Frank gore 4.1 ypc

Matt Forte 4.6 ypc

Adrian Peterson 4.5

Because numbers never lie...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you can't understand that statement, there's no help for you. No amount of Rum will ever change that.

 

 

please SPELL IT OUT FOR ME CAUSE I THOUGHT NUMBERS NEVER LIE LIKE WHEN YOU SAID THAT STUFF ABOUT HOPKINS AND KEENAN ALLEN AND NUMBERS NEVER LIE HE HAD BETTER ROOKIE NUMBERS THAN MEGATRON NUMBERS NEVER LIE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Me, I'm sick of WWE channel hopping their PLEs and shows. Netflix now with Raw. USA still has Smackdown but you can't get it with Roku if you don't also have cable. Then they went from all the PLEs on Peacock to ESPN+ which required upgrading your Disney+ package. Then they frikkin' move Saturday Night Main Event with John Cena's retirement match back over to frikkin' Peacock, which we'd just cancelled two months prior because no PLEs there anymore. And there are fewer, but longer matches and its the same danged stories again and again. Rematch after rematch after rematch between PLEs. Fewer matches, fewer wrestlers, more promos (of lesser quality) and less action.  It just seems like it's all fillers and re-runs. I'm tired of Cody Rhodes. I'm tired of Jey Uso. I'm tired of the two Brons. Shuffle the deck a bit guys, this game's getting stale.
    • Chuba was 3 yards behind the 3 gap. He was lined up weak offset I. It was a 33 dive. Chuba needed to power through off of Ekwonu's block and slip off into the 5 gap where the Tremble had the lane sealed and Rick pulled the LB out of the 5 gap. Here's a visual if you need proof. Chuba did a jump cut laterally to the 2 gap on the right side with unblocked defenders crashing down and went airborne.   This is a 33 dive that should have been slipped off the block into the 5 gap. Chuba lacked vision, but you can see Rico and Bryce staring at the intended running lane sealed off by Tremble and Ekwonu. He should have read Ekwonu's block. The blocking and misdirection is NOT set up for the right side. The play worked. Chuba failed to execute on this play. Trust who you want to, but I wouldn't suggest you argue with the video. Anyone telling you this was drawn up to go right with the blocking did not analyze it. They are correct it should have been a called dive, and it was a called dive.  This was a weak offset I bringing Tremble in motion from the right to the left.
×
×
  • Create New...