Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Telvin Smith visited today


Kuech the Sneak

Recommended Posts

TD really didn't play like a true safety tho, he played around the LOS a lot.

 

The NFL is changing. Smiths skills suit the direction the NFL is heading, I don't think he needs to hit the prototypical weight of 10 years ago to succeed at OLB. He's the type of LB you could keep on the field 3 downs with TD and Keek when teams try to no huddle and not be worse for it. Telvin is lean but I wouldn't call him small. I'm not worried about 10 lbs, he has speed and great instincts IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

TD really didn't play like a true safety tho, he played around the LOS a lot.

 

The NFL is changing. Smiths skills suit the direction the NFL is heading, I don't think he needs to hit the prototypical weight of 10 years ago to succeed at OLB. He's the type of LB you could keep on the field 3 downs with TD and Keek when teams try to no huddle and not be worse for it. Telvin is lean but I wouldn't call him small. I'm not worried about 10 lbs, he has speed and great instincts IMO.

I was at the game that Davis started at strong safety against the Patriots as a rookie. He wasn't playing the line of scrimmage. He looked to be in Cover 2 most of the first half and got TORCHED in coverage. He then was moved to the "joker" role and thrived. Telvin is a coverage linebacker though and I think he would do well as a WLB in our scheme. 10 lbs wouldn't be much to put on in an NFL training regimen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I

I was at the game that Davis started at strong safety against the Patriots as a rookie. He wasn't playing the line of scrimmage. He looked to be in Cover 2 most of the first half and got TORCHED in coverage. He then was moved to the "joker" role and thrived. Telvin is a coverage linebacker though and I think he would do well as a WLB in our scheme. 10 lbs wouldn't be much to put on in an NFL training regimen.

 

I was referring to his Georgia days. Completely forgot he played some safety here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He was talking about at UGA.  TD did play a lot in the box at UGA.

 

But, seriously, TD and Smith have very different body types.  TD looked like a guy who could put on more weight.  Smith looks like a hard gainer.  If a guy is still that lean after spending 4 years in a major program at LB, then I doubt he gains weight easily.  I'm sure the FSU S&C guys were trying to get weight on him.  According to his recruit rankings, he was 205 coming into FSU. 

 

Now I don't know this for sure, but I'd be willing to bet that Smith would be the lightest LB on an NFL roster at 218.  Again, this isn't a kid who is 20 years old and a RS sophomore.  This is a 23 year old young man.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They are built differently for sure. And you might be right about it being hard for him to put a lot of weight on. I'm just not too concerned about 10 lbs. I see a role he can fill for us and maybe they are looking at him more at safety. I just like the player and his skill set. Lavonte David isn't the biggest LB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

231, 233, 235 depending on your source, the point is he's not the biggest out there and he gets the job done.

 

You're the one saying he's maxed out at 218. Most players put on some weight when they enter a pro strength and conditioning program. I see a changing league where the rules are getting redefined for players on an almost yearly bases. I don't see a player that shy's away from contact in Telvin. I see a player that can help combat rules that favor passing teams. There aren't many power backs left in the league, can he shed blocks, does he have good instincts, these are things I'm more concerned about than his weight.

 

Shazier wasn't a particularly big LB at OSU either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wonder if we are going to use more three safety looks. Seems like alot of teams are goin to this year.

Don't want to toot my own horn, but, I have been saying all along Rivera wants those S/CB hybrids. Keek, and TD surrounded by 5 Ss. With our front 4, and the pressure they can generate. Zone coverage, with more eyes on the QB, the ability to see errant throws, and keep the play in front of you designs. Fits what the bigger S type guys can do. Along with better tackling, and run support, they make a good case for having their own formation.

Ah hellz. As soon as you think you have it figured out. Someone like Cam comes along and throws a big ol' King Kong wrench into the works.

Tackling. It is an integral detail to playing DB for Rivera. To a point. But S type Zone Coverage CBs could be the wave of the future. LBers are trending smaller to cover better. S are trending bigger to make up for it.

 

 

David weighs 235. At what point does 10 pounds become not important? 208 is only 10 pounds lighter than Smith. Would that still be alright? All I'm saying is at some point the weight does become an issue and 218 is awfully light for an NFL LB.

Adding 7 LBs puts him at 225. That sound good for todays NFL. If you want cover LBers, he fits your bill. If you want your LBers to stop the run first, he would fall a little short. Not fair to compare two different schemes.

Most teams don't have LBers that can both stop the run, and cover. So you have to substitute. Sometimes that can bite you on the azz. We are lucky to have both Keek and TD. Playing this well. Playing together. With this front 4. Dude.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The bottom line is we saw long stretches this season where T-Mac wasn't even targeted.  He had games where he went an entire half without seeing a pass thrown his way, and it lead to a bunch of games with 5 or less targets.  If he's healthy and we're not up a stupid amount and only running the ball, I can't see him having more than a game or two next year with 5 or less targets. We were also only 22nd this year in pass attempts, and that was with a rookie #1 and no legitimate 2nd option for half the season.  And even then, we were only 46 pass attempts above 31st place. If we go into next season with T-Mac improved in his 2nd season and a healthy Coker for 17 games, there is absolutely no reason for us to not throw it more.  That right away increases both of their target totals without sacrificing any targets from each other or other players, add in them taking targets from the TEs and RBs on top of that, and your argument just doesn't hold water anymore. You can't look at targets/yards in a vacuum and think next year Coker just takes some from T-Mac.  You have to look at the team as a whole and our situations this year and then project what will happen next year. If he's healthy for 17 games, I'd bet my life savings that T-Mac sees increases across the board, targets/catches/yards/TDs.   Just as Coker will also see career highs in all categories, it's not one vs the other, it's shifting offensive strategy given our personnel, which next year will be much better for our passing game (QB issues aside).
    • C'mon now.... First, you can't switch up your argument once someone points out a major flaw in your point. You're saying we shouldn't expect a big increase in targets/yards for T-Mac, but then shift to talking about averages with Chase when I point out the significant leap he took there once you factor in his missing games.  He saw an increase in targets in 5 less games, averages aside, he saw a significant increase in targets in his 2nd season, what he then did with those targets is actually irrelevant in this discussion. Puka seeing no increase is pointless, as he saw such an absurd amount of targets for a rookie, it's near impossible to see an increase. But the real issue in this post is that you think I'm proving your point by showing how Waddle had to share targets with Hill. Tyreek Hill was a 1st team All Pro who was 2nd in the NFL in yards that season. If you think Jaylen Waddle sharing targets with a 1st team All Pro and a future HOFer is even remotely in the same category as T-Mac needing to share targets with Coker... then you are certifiably insane, lol. If anything, you could make the argument that Coker is to Waddle as T-Mac is to Hill in that discussion (which would then lead to a serious increase in targets/yards for T-Mac).  But even that is insane, as neither T-Mac or Coker will be as good as Hill and Waddle respectively that season.  I love both of their potential, but c'mon now, T-Mac isn't getting 119 catches for 1,700 yards and Coker isn't getting 117 for 1,350 next season.
×
×
  • Create New...