All Activity
- Past hour
-
Consider it from the lens that the NFL is an entertainment product, whose goal is to keep users engaged for a long as possible. Also take into account sports betting spreads for a reason managing games towards desired outcomes. Blowout results are not good for user engagement or for any of the NFL's partners. The league appears to "nudge" games, not necessarily to decide a winner, but to maximize engagement, revenue, and narrative intrigue. The primary lever the NFL uses to "nudge" games towards a desired outcome is crew assignment. A "rigged" game doesn't require a backroom bribe, it simply requires assigning a referee crew whose known statistical biases align with the league's desired outcome. By analyzing data from the 2023-2025 seasons, we can categorize specific officials into "profiles" that sophisticated bettors, and likely the league itself, use to predict game flow. When the league needs a game to be an exciting shootout, they can assign crews that historically "swallow the whistle," allowing offenses to operate without rhythm-killing flags. Conversely, if the league needs to slow down a runaway offense or keep a game close to the spread, they can assign "flag-happy" crews that disrupt game flow. Certain referees show a statistical deviation that heavily favors the home team, often attributed to being influenced by crowd noise, or perhaps a tendency to support the "house" advantage. Lastly, the league might want to introduce chaos into a matchup that looks like a guaranteed blowout on paper. The league would assign a referee with high-variance penalties. A high volume of highly varied penalties is ideal for "trap games" where referees have an outsized impact on the result.
-
Svech
-
Is the OP trolling?
-
Lol no poop. They know what the viewership numbers are and they are going to do what's best for them if they can. Always has and always will in the current structure. Small market, boring games even when winning and little interest from other fanbases to tune in would be my guess is enough for them to justify it. Zero reasons to tune in to watch a wildly inconsistent team with little entertainment value beyond their or their opponent's fanbases.
-
NFL admits the TMac catch should not have been overturned
Manna replied to PanthersATL's topic in Carolina Panthers
Will they ever admit that Cotchery caught it? -
Why Panthers’ Dave Canales won’t run a QB sneak with Bryce Young
CRA replied to raleigh-panther's topic in Carolina Panthers
We went from the most dominate short yardage player in NFL history to a guy that can't run a sneak. Wild 180. -
NFL admits the TMac catch should not have been overturned
CRA replied to PanthersATL's topic in Carolina Panthers
NFL more than anything, just needs better and clearer rule on what is and isn't a catch. They almost have created a scenario where the refs can't do a good job. - Today
-
NFL admits the TMac catch should not have been overturned
csx replied to PanthersATL's topic in Carolina Panthers
That one was tough with the stupid catch rules. Historically that wouldn't be a catch. Thats not one I'd be the most concerned about -
2025-26 First Goal Thread
organicrusty1201 replied to Panthers Fan 69's topic in Carolina Hurricanes
Stank -
NFL admits the TMac catch should not have been overturned
Growl replied to PanthersATL's topic in Carolina Panthers
the league apparently confided this to the team in secret and was hoping it wouldn’t get out ”sorry we messed up your season-don’t tell anyone though” -
Going Ehlers
-
Member Statistics
