Jump to content

All Activity

This stream auto-updates

  1. Past hour
  2. I genuinely am sick of this high SOG crap. Doesn’t matter much when you allow 3 goals in on 15 shots for the other team.
  3. We love our team! Fire these fuging clowns
  4. The Cane’s will absolutely lose in the first round in the playoffs. These guys are fuging dog water.
  5. Add Montreal to the list of teams Carolina won't beat in the playoffs.
  6. Wish duke had to play Michigan and Arizona both. They lucked out getting that Illinois draw
  7. What a disaster of a Sunday for CBS. Two absolute blowouts.
  8. There are a handful of similarly rated players bunched around our pick. We need someone to fall to us that would stand out from that crowd to get some trade interest. I can’t think of a player tha might reasonably fall to us that I feel like we have to have. I am just out on picking a TE or WR in the 1st round over a trade back that gets us one of those bunched together players a few picks later and also allows us to move up for the seemingly inevitable run on ILBs in the top 1/3of the 2nd.
  9. Today
  10. Mays is also interested but I think he's the third choice based on what I've seen.
  11. Roy's long time assistant Robinson is there at Arizona with him as well.
  12. Its against my rules to draft a FS in round one, but Thien makes its super hard to not break that rule. He does look like he'd change a defense for the better. Value value value, you just never see Cs or true FS in the 1st. Im thinking more about a trade in the works. I do not like the group * of teams around 19. I like the player pool below and into the late 20s..
  13. Its Lloyd, he just said AZ will have a great coach after him... Billy is plan B if LLyod changes his mind, but by all counts he is the guy. Now I got to learn about him, zero clue on him.
  14. You know more about this than I do, so correct my logic.....II have a hunch that our pick is going to be Thieneman. In round 2, the LB. (Hill, Rodriguez, or Golday). Then I see a DT. Those are the positions we could use starters. Everywhere else, we have starters (OT, C, CB, WR or TE, arguably --our primary depth needs), will be day 3 picks
  15. interesting. Nice fit--and I am not confident he was at the combine--ran about a 4.7 during his pro day. UDFA interest?
  16. If it's between Lloyd and Donovan, I take Lloyd 100 out of 100 times. And it seems like it must be between them since they haven't made a hire yet
  17. Can confirm that Lloyd is interested in the UNC job and isn't using it as a crutch for a pay raise and that Arizona already has a contingency plan in place if he leaves. I'm beginning to think based on rumblings that's he already decided to leave and informed UNC and Arizona of this. "Both schools knowing explains the information coming out of Arizona."
  18. With the DBs, I see more role definition than positional these days, so tend to view value a bit differently there...Basically, there's better defined roles to focus on rather than what position is listed next to their profile. Those roles: 1-The Outside Corner Group - obviously the highest valued DB 2-The Safety/Slot group - Higher-end safeties that can play slot/NB( I.E. It's the modern guy people want-- Hamilton, Branch, Pitre, Emman, the list goes on) 3-The smaller Nickel-only group. Most of the time undersized guys that can't play outside -- the good ones end up out their 70% of the time these days with how much teams use 5/6DB sets. 4-The safety-only group Regarding group 2: If you have a guy that runs in 2SH next to TM but then in a dime package be pulled into the slot so you can play Ransom/Scott back there, that's good value. They really just play either spot at any given moment dependent on the matchup. They allow for defenses to better disguise and make QBs think sideways. Thieneman, McNeil-Warren, & Haulcy all fall into this group for me this year.
  1. Load more activity
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      46,056
    • Most Online
      7,562

    Newest Member
    PanthersUSN
    Joined
×
×
  • Create New...