shaqattaq

My cousin married a hog farmer, and that's his favorite line.

OK, according to the link, Miami traded #6 to Dallas for #10, then traded #10 to us for #8, which we traded to philly for #12. Clear as mud! I've thought about the idea of trading for miami's # 18, & 36, so that was my first thought here, It's a bit convoluted. And also, why the fug do we see Slater as a guard when everyone else in the world sees him as the #2 LT available? That's even harder to understand.

ACDC Night Prowler

Darrisaw is my #3 LT, and my target IF we decide to trade back a few picks. I have absolutely no qualms about double dipping at tackle, but for rd 2, I'd go for one of the top right tackles, Jenkins or Mayfield, if they're available. That way, we can let Moton walk if he continues to play hardball with his long-term deal. I love Moton's play BTW, but business is business. My preference is still CB at #39 though.

I really don't think so. Would he have made bad decisions? Sure, his tendency to look panicked and force the ball into some questionable situations is well documented; even coming out of college. Also documented is the fact that he has the physical talent to succeed IF he can settle down and make better decisions. The only question I have is whether Rhule/Brady/Ryan can coach his natural tendencies and 3 years of terrible coaching out of him. Who the fug knows? If we put an O-line in front of him, I do think that he is in a perfect place to succeed.

I would NOT be opposed to trading back into the teens before we get our LT. Plenty of talent in the later 1st to early second. plus an extra round 2 pick will help out a lot with our other needs.

I agree 150%

@MHS831, #'s 35, 37, and 38 really hurt my feelings, Mills, Freirmuth, & Leatherwood I want all 3 at 39. Love Sewell though.

This is my prediction as well, especially since Burrow requested him by name. I've been saying that we likely draft a LT at #39, so no reason they can't at #38.

I definitely want 1, if not 2, in the mid-to-late rounds, especially if one of them has a shot at center. IMO, we get CB and LT in rds 1 & 2, then start looking to IOL, LB, FS, TE, WR. We should be able to find a starter/significant upgrade for 1 of those positions at 73, and a solid contributor at 113. Man, I hope we draft as well this year as it appears we did last. I'm all giddy with anticipation!

Either way, Lance to ATL makes sense, assuming they go QB.

He does have 2 more years on his rookie contract, so he's cheap AF. He actually might have trade value, if not much.

Foucault!

Unless SF have their heads so far up their owns asses they can't see (a very probable situation), Fields WILL go at #3. 1 person says that SF is in love with Jones, and every other talking head regurgitates it for clicks. FWIW, I'm all in on LT or CB even if fields is available.

whew boy, Pittsburgh is waaaaay back at 24. They'd have to bring a hellova offer. I'm still waiting for Miami to get cute with that #18 pick. They have 2 in the 1st and 2 in the 2nd. They could surround Tua with 2 top 10 weapons, and still have another top 50 pick. We could have #18, #36, and #39.

Kristen left porn hub open in the background.

Also, Shaq is still out there busting his hump. He didn't sign the big contract, then get lazy; looking at you KK.

20-0 baby!!!

I'd looked at brown during the Senior bowl after that video emerged. He'd be a guy I'd consider in case we don't work out a long term with Moton. A long, athletic RT that has only played that a year and a half, so is likely just starting to scratch the surface of his potential. A year on the bench, with good coaching and training, and he could get really, really good. Edit: Moore could be a starter immediately as a rd 4 pick, that'd be nice to have

This was my thought, you can't double team them both. Don't worry, we added Reddick, Fox, and Perryman to YGM, Brown and Chinn...We'll get our sacks anyway.

Nothing worse than a broken down hooker!

All 3 of these, or Freiermuth would be good at 39, IMO. Obviously, depending on what we do in the 1st rd.