Jump to content

ForJimmy

HUDDLER
  • Posts

    20,333
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by ForJimmy

  1. Our OL is doing a good job at keeping him upright. I will say his arm looks fine, but it’s only been 2 games. Hopefully he can keep it up for the next 13 games
  2. Manning looked good but he had some turnovers against lesser competition. Quinn has kept him at bay for over a year now.
  3. Anyone know if 240 to 26 is currently operational? I know 40 to 26 isn’t. We are trying to head south and I don’t fully trust Google Maps saying this is the best route…
  4. The Panthers haven’t existed for 25 years. How much did you take???
  5. No one is trading a 1st for him. We can take the offer or let him walk for free this offseason.
  6. If the Chiefs give us the best offer then I’m for trading with them. I could care less how much better it makes them. This isn’t our window right now anyway.
  7. It’s how you properly rebuild. Acquire assets for expiring contracts then turn those assets into young players to build your roster with. AT will probably return a 4th or so but he has not many years left, hopefully we can get a 2nd for DJ. Keep developing XL, Mingo, JT, Brooks (when healthy), Wallace, and let’s see what Coker can do. If half of these guys start looking the part it’s a good start plus our 2 extra picks in the draft.
  8. Yeah that’s what I’m saying. Johnson was good at Pittsburgh too with shitty QB play. He is a high end WR2 IMO and if a contract reflects that then I’m ok with it. I’d prefer sending him to the highest bidder if the price is good (2nd rounder would be nice!).
  9. In their defense Johnson is a much more talented WR than Robbie was… Robbie was a one trick pony. Johnson is good at the whole route tree. However I do understand the point you are making. Any WR that looks halfway decent we want to throw money at.
  10. He has been, but I'd like to see it against some decent CBs.
  11. Yeah and Burns wasn't worth 30 million a year but some dumb team paid him it. These contracts get larger and larger each yeah and if he thinks he is a WR1 (which he does) he will want his money. If we can sign him for $20 million or less, I'd be all for it. I just don't see him agreeing to that...
  12. So you want to pay him #1 WR money knowing he isn't one because he is getting open in an offense that is known to get WRs open? You are willing to lock in $30 million a year on him?
  13. I'm leaning towards sending DJ and AT to the highest bidder if (when) we only have a couple wins at the trade deadline. Get Coker some more playing time and David Moore can be our vet. The name of the game this year is to develop our young pieces (XL, Mingo, JT, Brooks, Wallace etc).
  14. He broke 1000 yards once in his career. Sure he looks good in comparison to Mingo and our rookie XL. I do think that DC's offense is pretty WR friendly. I just know he is going to want to be paid a lot. I'm not against it but we have a lot of holes to fill....
  15. The only problem is some will just opt to play another year and get NIL money if they aren't going to be a top pick. For example I find Allar intriguing, but he is only a junior and will just play another year if he isn't projected as a 1st rounder IMO...
  16. I'm ok with this as long as we bring on some legit competition. A younger player with some upside to get behind a bridge QB plus Bryce. We need a Plan B and C because the odds are stacked against him right now.
  17. Howell reminds me a lot of Baker. I feel like Canales' offense would work well with him. Too bad Seattle just traded for him or I'd be tempted to throw a lower pick to acquire him.
×
×
  • Create New...